IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 August 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011228
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 24 July 2008, that shows he achieved course standards be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
2. The applicant states that there are two DD Forms 1059, dated 24 July 2008, in his OMPF. One shows he completed Drill Sergeant School (DSS) and the other shows he did not complete the course. He states that the DA Form 1059 that shows he did not complete DSS is correct and the DA Form 1059 that shows he completed the course needs to be removed from his OMPF.
3. The applicant states that he was medically released from the course. He states that he pre-signed the two DA Forms 1059 and that the school made a mistake by submitting both documents to be added in his OMPF.
4. The applicant provides two DA Forms 1059 with the date 24 July 2008.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The performance portion of the applicant's OMPF has two DA Forms 1059 dated 27 July 2008, one shows he "ACHIEVED COURSE STANDARDS" and one shows that he "FAILED TO ACHIEVE COURSE STANDARDS" for Drill Sergeant Course
12-08.
2. On 4 August 2009, the operations noncommissioned officer (NCO) at the U.S. Army DSS at Fort Jackson, South Carolina verified to the Board analyst that the applicant was dropped from the DSS course on graduation day, due to being issued a physical profile for a stress fracture.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
Evidence of record shows that a DA Form 1059, dated 24 July 2008, showing the applicant had achieved course standards for Drill Sergeant Course 12-08 was incorrectly placed in the applicant's OMPF for no apparent reason. The school operations NCO verified that the applicant was dropped from the course and the DA Form 1059 was erroneously placed in the applicant's OMPF. Therefore, the DA Form 1059, dated 24 July 2008, that shows the applicant achieved course standards should be removed from the performance portion of his OMPF.
BOARD VOTE:
____X__ ____X___ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the achieved course standards DA Form 1059, dated 24 July 2008, from the performance portion of his OMPF.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090011228
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090011228
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008272
Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation shows that the DA Form 1059 is filed on the performance section of the OMPF. The evidence of record shows that the applicant failed to achieve course standards for Phase II of 19D BNCOC from 22 May 2008 to 2 July 2008. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021765
The applicant provides a copy of the NCOER in question; discharge Orders 03-262-00005, dated 19 September 2003; and DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report) in support of this application. Army Regulation 623-205 states that the primary purpose of a commander's inquiry (CI) is to provide a greater degree of command involvement in preventing obvious injustices to the rated Soldier and correcting errors before they become a matter of permanent record. The evidence of record further shows...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002968
Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies governing the OMPF, the military personnel records jacket, the career management individual file, and Army personnel qualification records. Army Regulation 600-8-104, Table 2-1 states that DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF. The evidence of record supports his contention he tore the meniscus ligament in his left...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017183
The applicant requests his DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report) for the Drill Sergeant Course be moved to the restricted portion of his official military personnel file (OMPF). In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF. The applicant requests his DA Form 1059 for the Drill Sergeant Course be transferred to the restricted portion of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073081C070403
The applicant requests that his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), or be transferred to his Restricted (R) fiche, of his OMPF. The applicant's DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, was properly filed on the Performance (P) fiche of his OMPF in accordance with applicable regulations. __mp___ ___ho__ __cp___ GRANT AS STATED IN...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011140
The applicant requests correction of his military record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his completion of Drill Sergeant School (DSS), award of the Drill Sergeant Hat and insignia, and promotion to sergeant (SGT/E-5). b. Paragraph 8-17 (removal from the drill sergeant program) states installation, U.S. Army Training Center, separate brigade and/or appropriate equivalent commanders may remove active duty Soldiers from the Drill...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006515
The applicant provides two DA Forms 1059, dated 8 September 2007. Therefore, it would be appropriate to remove the DA Form 1059, dated 8 September 2007, which shows an X in item 11b from his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Form 1059, dated 8 September 2007, which shows an X in item 11b from his OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071753C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS : Removal of a Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The commandant of the drill sergeant school recommended that he return to the course at the earliest possible date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010969
The applicant requests; * dismissal of the action that removed him from the drill sergeant program * retention of his Drill Sergeant Identification Badge * retention of his "X" special qualification identifier (SQI) * removal of the change of rater DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)), covering the rating period 1 November 2010 through 1 June 2011 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) from his records 2. The applicant provides: * Letter, dated 10 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007483
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 January 2007, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Accordingly, as required by the applicable regulation at the time, she was issued a DA Form 1059 that shows she marginally achieved course standards in that she met the academic requirements but failed to meet body fat standards IAW AR 600-9 during this course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...