Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011246
Original file (20100011246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011246 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his honorable discharge to a medical retirement.

2.  The applicant states his medical condition was not given any consideration at the termination of his service.  He adds prior to his discharge from the Army, he was treated for dysthymic disorder (depressive neurosis) on several occasions and prescribed medication.  He opines that dysthymic disorder is just another name for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  The applicant states upon his discharge he immediately went to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) where he was evaluated and received a 50 percent disability rating for PTSD.  

3.  The applicant provides the following:

* Self-authored statement
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Permanent Orders 314-116, dated 10 November 2005
* Health Records extract
* VA Decision Document

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s record shows he originally enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 2 July 1991.  He served 6 years and on 1 July 1997, he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  On 3 April 2003, the applicant again enlisted in the RA and served 4 years.  

3.  Permanent Orders 314-116, dated 10 November 2005, show the applicant was awarded the Combat Action Badge (CAB) as a result of being engaged by the enemy via indirect fire on 8 June 2005. 

4.  The applicant provided copies of documents extracted from his health records that show he was seen at the servicing medical clinic on the following dates for the following conditions:

	a.  20 February 2006, Post deployment screening exam.  Psychological symptoms, he had a long history of depression (since teen) and was treated with tricyclic antidepressant as a teenager, but had no medication in several years.  The applicant reported an overall feeling of malaise/generalized anhedonia.  He desired evaluation/counseling and wished to avoid medication.  

	b.  6 December 2006, Redeployment follow-up.  Problems listed were Dysthymic Disorder, (depressive neurosis), non-neoplastic nevus, warts, Tuberculin induration positive interpretation and nonspecific reaction without active tuberculosis.  Medications for Dysthymic Disorder included Amitriptyline and Bupropion.

   c.  19 December 2006,  Follow-up appointment.  Problems listed were Dysthymic Disorder, (depressive neurosis), non-neoplastic nevus, warts, Tuberculin induration positive interpretation and nonspecific reaction without active tuberculosis.  Deployment related visit.  Depression and anhedonia in the past two weeks.

5.  The applicant's official military personnel file contains a DA Form 4991-R (Declination of Continued Service) that shows on 5 June 2006, he signed this form declining to reenlist and/or extend to meet his service obligation.  He elected to be discharged at his expiration term of service (ETS), 2 April 2007.

6.  The applicant's medical records and his separation medical examination are not available for review.  However, the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty on 2 April 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service.

7.  The applicant's VA Rating Decision document, dated 4 February 2008, shows he received a 50 percent disability rating for PTSD.  The decision document stated the applicant's award of the CAB confirmed his exposure to an in-service stressor.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40, (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.  When a Soldier is being processed for separation for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until Soldier is scheduled for separation, is an indication that the individual is fit.  

9.  This same regulation states the commander will refer a Soldier to the servicing medical treatment facility for medical evaluation when the Soldier is believed to be unable to perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.  The medical treatment facility commander having primary medical care responsibility will conduct an examination of a Soldier referred for evaluation.  The commander will advise the Soldier's commanding officer of the results of the evaluation and the proposed disposition.  If it appears the Soldier is not medically qualified to perform duty, the medical treatment facility commander will refer the soldier to a MEB. 

10.  Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his diagnosis of dysthymic disorder (depressive neurosis) is the same as PTSD.  He provides selected medical records that show he was diagnosed with recurrent major depression which was noted to be mild and in partial remission.  Evidence shows the applicant had a long history of depression (since teen) as noted in his post deployment screening exam, and was previously treated with tricyclic antidepressant.

2.  There is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any to show that he was physically unfit to perform his duties at the time of his separation.  Further, the evidence of record shows the applicant signed a declination of continued service and elected to be separated at his ETS.

3.  The applicant implies that since he received a 50 percent disability rating percentage from VA for PTSD he should receive a similar rating and a subsequent medical retirement.  The VA is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned. Consequently, the applicant's medical condition of depression, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement may be sufficient to qualify him for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

4.  Furthermore, an award of a VA disability rating subsequent to separation from the service does not establish entitlement an individual to medical retirement or separation.  Operating under its own policies and regulations, the VA awards ratings because a medical condition is related to service, i.e., service-connected. The VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his/her lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.  On the contrary, the Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated.  Consequently, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

5.  No medical evidence has been presented by the applicant to demonstrate an injustice in the medical treatment he received in service or any evidence to show that he was denied due process.  Consequently, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to correct his records to show that he was medically retired.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011246





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011246



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00650

    Original file (PD2009-00650.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The service treatment record (STR) included a pre-deployment health assessment that noted the CI was non-deployable pending a dental exam and evaluation by cardiology and mental health for symptoms of chest pain, hyperventilation, and dizziness to rule out cardiac disease and/or anxiety disorder. As described above, the CI was referred to Mental Health for further evaluation of his chronic pain, where he was diagnosed with Chronic Anxiety Disorder with Agoraphobia. While the CI did have a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02797

    Original file (BC-2002-02797.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel responded and states that he concurs the recommendation of the Medical Consultant. The Board considered the applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect that he was medically retired; however, the Board majority does not believe that his condition at the time of his discharge was severe enough to warrant a disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007120

    Original file (20140007120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 February 2009, a PEB was convened and considered the applicant's condition of ITB. The board also found he was physically unfit and recommended a disability rating of 20% for degenerative disc disease and 10% for ITB for a combined disability rating of 30% with permanent disability retirement. Army Regulation 635-40 sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03859

    Original file (PD-2014-03859.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the case file was reviewed regarding unfavorable diagnosis change, fitness determination, applicability of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.129, and rating of the MH condition adjudicated as not unfitting. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements; a disability rating IAW the VASRD and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended.The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00291

    Original file (PD2011-00291.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mental Health Condition . The Board noted the CI honorably separated in 2003 and was rated 10% by the VA for panic disorder and reenlisted one month later without disclosing his mental health condition. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01281

    Original file (PD2010-01281.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the matter of the dysthymic/anxiety disorder, the Board by a 2:1 vote recommends an initial TDRL rating of 50% in retroactive compliance with VASRD §4.129 as DOD directed, and a 30% permanent rating (with a change in diagnosis to posttraumatic stress disorder, code 9411) IAW VASRD §4.130. After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00090

    Original file (PD2011-00090.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was also found unfit for dysthymic disorder and ulcerative colitis. PTSD Condition . The Board discussed at length whether ulcerative colitis was permanently service aggravated and subject to rating or existed prior to service as a condition that is known to have exacerbations that are not related to service and thus not eligible for rating.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020087

    Original file (20090020087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was discharged medically and rated at 10 percent for his knees and while he was still on active duty he was rated at 60-percent disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The PEB determined the remainder of his conditions noted by the MEB were not unfitting and recommended that the applicant be separated with severance pay with a 10-percent disability rating. The VA Rating decision provided by the applicant shows that on 3 September 1997, the VA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020834

    Original file (20090020834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. As such, there is no evidence he has a service-connected disability rating from the VA for PTSD. His military records show he was given medical and mental health evaluations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510421C070209

    Original file (9510421C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 14 July 1993 PEB determined that the applicant had a major depression requiring medication and psychotherapy with mild impairment of social and industrial adaptability (recommended disability percentage of 10 percent), and PTSD manifested by flashbacks, anxiety including hyperventilation syndrome, and phobic reaction rated as mild (recommended disability percentage of 10 percent). Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who...