IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 June 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080006515
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course (BNCOC), dated 8 September 2007, which shows an X in item 11b (Performance Summary/Achieved Course Standards) be removed from his military records.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that upon completion of BNCOC he received two DA Forms 1059, dated 8 September 2007. He contends that the DA Form 1059 which shows an X in item 11b is the incorrect form.
3. The applicant provides two DA Forms 1059, dated 8 September 2007.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant entered active duty on 18 April 2001. He is currently serving on active duty in the rank of staff sergeant.
2. The applicant provided two DA Forms 1059, dated 8 September 2007, which show he attended BNCOC at the United States Training Center (USATC) Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Academy at Fort Eustis, Virginia during the period 22 June 2007 to 8 September 2007 and passed the course. One DA Form 1059 shows an X in item 11b and one DA Form 1059 shows an X in item 11a (Performance Summary/Exceeded Course Standards).
3. Officials at the USATC NCO Academy at Fort Eustis, Virginia confirmed that the DA Form 1059 which shows the applicant exceeded course standards is the correct form.
4. A review of the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) on the Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed a copy of both of the DA Forms 1059, dated 8 September 2007.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
Officials at the USATC NCO Academy at Fort Eustis, Virginia confirmed that the DA Form 1059 which shows the applicant exceeded course standards is the correct form. Therefore, it would be appropriate to remove the DA Form 1059, dated 8 September 2007, which shows an X in item 11b from his OMPF.
BOARD VOTE:
___xx___ ___xx___ _____xx_ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Form 1059, dated 8 September 2007, which shows an X in item 11b from his OMPF.
_ __xxxxx ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006515
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006515
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002368
He provides: * his Enlisted Record Brief * a DA Form 1059 showing he "achieved course standards" * a DA Form 1059 showing he "exceeded course standards" * a self-authored memorandum to the Board * an Army Medical Department (AMEDD) NCO Academy memorandum, subject: Commandant's List * a recognition ceremony announcement containing a Commandant's List for BNCOC Class 001-06 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009267
The applicant states that: a. she has two DA forms 1059 showing she completed Phase I of BNCOC; b. she has completed the Warrior Leadership Course in 2006 and would like to have the DA Form 1059 for PLDC removed; c. she was awarded a certificate of achievement that is showing the wrong year; and d. she only needs one DD Form 214 in her OMPF. The applicant's records also show that she was released from active duty on 23 October 1999 in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082864C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: The removal of an Academic Evaluation Report (DA Form 1059) dated 24 January 2001 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008272
Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation shows that the DA Form 1059 is filed on the performance section of the OMPF. The evidence of record shows that the applicant failed to achieve course standards for Phase II of 19D BNCOC from 22 May 2008 to 2 July 2008. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067073C070402
DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: The Board notes the applicant’s request to have the AER he received, dated 3 May 1994, along with all other information and/or documents related to his release from his first BNCOC class removed from his OMPF. The evidence of record confirms that the AER in question, along with all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000910
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that the DA Form 1059, dated 13 February 2007, should be removed from his OMPF. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007483
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 January 2007, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Accordingly, as required by the applicable regulation at the time, she was issued a DA Form 1059 that shows she marginally achieved course standards in that she met the academic requirements but failed to meet body fat standards IAW AR 600-9 during this course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091491C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 9 June 2003, the applicant submitted an application to the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records (ABCMR) requesting amendment to DA Form 1059 to reflect that he satisfactorily completed BNCOC 98-05. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted driving record transcripts from the State of Virginia showing no history of DUI as additional evidence and a copy of Periodic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070881C070402
The applicant requests that the Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER) (DA Form 1059) covering the period 20 April 1994 through 11 May 1994 [herein identified as the "contested AER"] be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or transferred to the restricted fiche of his OMPF. On 11 May 1994, the applicant was notified by the Commandant of the NCO Academy that he had been released from the BNCOC Class Number 2-94 for academic reasons. Records show the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605941C070209
A 20 November 1990 AER from the software analyst, MOS 74F, BNCOC at Fort Gordon, Georgia, shows that she was administratively released from the course because she failed written and hands-on portion [of the course], with a recommendation that she be allowed to work in her MOS before attending the course again. She stated, in effect, that because of overstrength in MOS 74F at Fort Gordon, she did not have the opportunity to work in that MOS, and coupled with the fact that she was recently...