Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008227
Original file (20090008227.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 July 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008227 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that Permanent Orders Number 268-00023 dated     25 September 1998 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). 

2.  The applicant states that his OMPF contains an invalid order awarding him the fifth award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) for the period of September 1995 to September 1998.  He goes on to state that he enlisted in September 1989 and therefore was not eligible to receive the fifth award of the GCMDL in 1998 because he was only eligible for the third award, which is properly represented in his OMPF in Permanent Orders Number 260-709 dated 17 September 1998.  He further states that he attempted on numerous occasions to have the error corrected and was advised to apply to this Board.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the erroneous order, a copy of the correct order and a copy of an electronic mail message advising him to apply to the Board.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 September 1989 and has remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 1 January 2005.  He is currently serving in Southwest Asia.

2.  The applicant's first award of the GCMDL ended on 20 September 1992.  His second award of the GCMDL ended on 20 September 1995.  His third award of the GCMDL ended on 20 September 1998.  However, a second order was published on 25 September 1998 which awarded the applicant the fifth award of the GCMDL ending on 14 September 1998.  The correct order was issued by the 516th Personnel Services Battalion in Korea and the incorrect order (Permanent Orders 268-00023 dated 25 September 1998) were issued at Fort Gordon, Georgia. 

3.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  The regulation states that, after 27 August 1940, three years of qualifying service was required for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that Permanent Orders Number 268-00023 dated 25 September 1998, which are filed in his OMPF, are erroneous and should be removed from his OMPF has been noted and found to have merit. 

2.  The contested orders not only award him the fifth award instead of the third award, but they also contain the wrong period of service.

3.  The applicant's records contain an order which properly awarded him the GCMDL (third award) for the proper period of service.

4.  Accordingly, it would be appropriate at this time to revoke Permanent Orders 268-00023 dated 25 September 1998, issued by Headquarters, United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon and to remove it from his OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by revoking Permanent Orders Number 268-00023 dated 25 September 1998, issued by Headquarters, United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon and to removing it from his OMPF and ensuring the revocation orders are not filed in his OMPF. 




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008227





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008227



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008006

    Original file (20100008006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding her the third award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding her the GCMDL (3rd Award) were revoked. Therefore, it would be appropriate to revoke the second (duplicate) order that was issued awarding the applicant the GCMDL (3rd Award) for the same period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060003520C070205

    Original file (AR20060003520C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rowland Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of permanent orders 357- 25 dated 23 December 1997 and permanent orders number 205-4 dated 24 July 1998 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states that the two cited orders are duplicate orders of awards of the second and third awards of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and they should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001402

    Original file (20090001402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his official military personnel file (OMPF) on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) be corrected by removing erroneous or duplicate orders concerning his third award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022606

    Original file (20100022606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Paragraph 2-4 contains guidance on changing the OMPF and specifies that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records may direct removal or movement of documents filed in the OMPF in the interest of justice or equity. The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two orders awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023180

    Original file (20100023180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states PO 26-886, dated 26 January 2001, is the appropriate order for the AGCM (2nd Award) that covers the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000. A review of his record shows the following awards are filed in the performance section of his OMPF: a. AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1997 per PO 029-00014 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, on 29 January 1998; b. AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000 per PO...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011955

    Original file (20100011955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was erroneously issued orders awarding a second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and that the orders were revoked. Both orders are filed on his OMPF/iPERMS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from his OMPF/iPERMS Permanent Order 163-5030, dated 12 June 2007, awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) and Orders 268-5002, dated 25 September 2007, revoking...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086698C070212

    Original file (2003086698C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also states that such requests for bars to reenlistment will be forwarded to Commander, U.S. Army Enlistment Eligibility Activity in St. Louis, Missouri and will contain a statement that it is the intent of the commander(s) concerned to deny the soldier the opportunity to attain retirement eligibility. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides in paragraph 4-8(b) that an individual whose retention is not warranted under standards prescribed in Army Regulation 604-10, paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000030

    Original file (20100000030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 11 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100000030 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The publishing of Permanent Orders 263-388 (2nd Award), Permanent Orders 264-393 (3rd Award), and Permanent Orders 101-710 (4th Award) were administrative errors and hold no historical value in documenting the applicant's military career.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011405

    Original file (20080011405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 07 AUGUST 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011405 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) (2nd Award), dated 10 December 2002 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by revoking E Company, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001909

    Original file (20110001909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding him the GCMDL (1st Award) were revoked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. filing in his OMPF Permanent Orders 026-01, 1st...