Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001786
Original file (20090001786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  10 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001786 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, removal of Permanent Order 292-05, dated 19 October 2005, for award of the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that Permanent Order 292-05 shows incorrect dates of service.  From 2001 until 2005, he and his younger brother were both stationed at Fort Irwin, California, and they both were serving as sergeants, pay grade E-5.  When his battalion S-1 saw his name on the roster as being due a Good Conduct Medal, the dates of service were accidentally pulled from the records of his younger brother and used to issue him the award.  The award was returned for correction before it was awarded, but he has been unable to get the corrected award placed in his file because they will not let him submit awards with the same award number on them.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Army Delayed Entry Program on 9 November 1995.  He enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 27 June 1996.  He is currently serving on active duty in the rank of staff sergeant, pay grade E-6.

2.  The applicant's military records located on the Integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System contain Permanent Orders 217-7, dated 5 August 1999, awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period from 27 June 1996 to 26 June 1999.

3.  The applicant's records also contain Permanent Order 292-05, dated 19 October 2005, awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period from 20 June 2000 to 19 June 2003.

4.  The applicant's records further contain General Orders Number 2262, dated 20 May 1967, awarding the Air Medal to several Soldiers for their service during the Vietnam War.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) provides policy and procedures for maintenance of a Soldier's personal information.  Paragraph 2-4a states that once placed in the OMPF, a document becomes a permanent part of that file.  The document will not be removed from an OMPF or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period from 27 June 1996 through 26 June 1999.  His OMPF also contains Permanent Order 292-05, dated 19 October 2005, again awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on an administrative error.

2.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is entitled to have Permanent Order 292-05, dated 19 October 2005, revoked and then removed from his OMPF.

3.  In the processing of this case it was also noted that the applicant's OMPF contained General Orders Number 2262, dated 20 May 1967, for award of the Air Medal.  It appears that these orders were improperly filed in the applicant's OMPF due to an administrative error.  Therefore, at this time he is also entitled to removal of General Orders Number 2262 from his OMPF.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.   revoking Permanent Order 292-05, dated 19 October 2005; and

     b.  removing Permanent Order 292-05, dated 19 October 2005 (and ensuring the order revoking this order is not filed in his OMPF), and General Orders Number 2262, dated 20 May 1967, from the applicant's OMPF.



      __________x_______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014384



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001786



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020926

    Original file (20100020926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the erroneous award order, the revocation order, and the correct order awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award). Corrected orders were issued for the applicant's 3rd award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * removing from his OMPF Permanent Orders Number 292-1, dated 8 November 2004, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010514C070208

    Original file (20040010514C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Order Number 132-00026, United States Army Intelligence Center and Fort Huachuca, dated 12 May 2003 shows the applicant was awarded the AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 19 May 2000 to 20 May 2003. Permanent Orders Number 152-3, dated 1 June 1999 shows applicant was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 25 May 1996 to 23 May 1999. Permanent Orders 132-00026, dated 12 May 2003 awarded the applicant the AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 19 May 2000 to 20 May 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018942

    Original file (20070018942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that an order awarding her the Good Conduct Medal (GCM) and its subsequent revocation order be removed from her Official Personnel Military File (OPMF). The service start date of 1 October 1996 is the date the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and this date does not take into consideration the applicant's computed active duty service date which is 18 May 1996. The two award orders are permanent documents, which by regulatory guidance must be filed in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001597

    Original file (20110001597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the following duplicate documents from his official military personnel file (OMPF): * Permanent Orders 262-320, dated 18 September 1996, awarding him the Parachutist Badge * Permanent Orders 274-061, dated 01 October 1999, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) 2. His records also contains a copy of Permanent Orders 072-20, dated 13 March 1997, issued by the same command, awarding him the Parachutist Badge for successful completion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008304

    Original file (20080008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Permanent Orders Number 84-01 and 84-03 dated 25 March 1999, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the 2nd and 3rd award be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). It is evident that the orders which the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009232C070206

    Original file (20050009232C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s request to have a memorandum, dated 19 November 1996 pertaining to denial of award to the AGCM removed from his records was carefully considered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Department of the Army, 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry, Fort Drum, New York, memorandum dated 19 November 1996 and titled Denial of Good Conduct Medal, be removed from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021439

    Original file (20090021439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal - first and second awards - are incorrect as to the dates or period of service, and she has correct orders in her records for these awards. A Detachment, 516th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 26-226, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 May 1998 to 26 May 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010726C071029

    Original file (20060010726C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal, and which were rescinded, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's request for removal of Permanent Orders 109-18 and Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award and 3rd Award), for an incorrect period of good conduct, from her OMPF, has merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019060

    Original file (20080019060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 September 2008, Permanent Orders 248-022 were issued by Task Force Duke, 3d Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, in Afghanistan which awarded the applicant the CIB effective 1 September 2008. The applicable regulations state that only one award of the CIB is authorized for designated periods and the applicant has been awarded two awards for the same period of authorization. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060001530

    Original file (20060001530.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides his BSM orders and award certificate; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award); his MSM orders and award certificate; and orders revoking the MSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division Permanent Orders #019-01...