Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018855
Original file (20070018855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  20 MAY 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070018855 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was a SGT/E-5 when he was discharged from military service.  His military identification card shows his rank as  
SGT/E-5 on 21 July 1965.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his identification card dated 21 July 1965.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant's military personnel record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 18 July 1961.  He completed the necessary training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.10 (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  His personnel record shows he served continuously on active duty until he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve on 6 July 1963.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 19 days of Net Service This Period.

4.  Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 3b (Date of Rank) of his DD Form  
214 show the entries "SP4 (E4) (T)" and "1 Dec 62."

5.  Item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "Item 3a:  PFC  
(E3) (P) Aptd:  1 Jul 62 DOR:  23 Mar 62."

6.  An available DA Form 24 (Service Record) confirms the above information.

7.  The applicant’s personnel record shows he was permanently appointed to the rank of SGT/E-5 on 16 March 1965, after he had separated from active duty on 
6 July 1963.

8.  The identification card the applicant submitted shows that his rank was "Sgt" after he was separated from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve to complete his Reserve obligation.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation states, in pertinent part, that you enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.   Enter the date of rank shown and if the date of rank is different from the date of appointment, enter the date of appointment in the remarks section of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that Item 3a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show SGT/E-5.

2.  There is no evidence that the applicant was promoted beyond pay grade  
E-4 before separating from active duty.  His records show that he was permanently appointed in pay grade E-3 on 1 July 1962 and he was serving as a SP4 (T) before separation.  Therefore, he is not entitled to corrections of his records to show in item 3a of his DD Form 214 SGT/E-5.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data/information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.

4.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, those records should not be changed.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




       _   ___X____   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070018855



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070018855



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003815

    Original file (20120003815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held the permanent rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and he was entitled to pay at the E-5 rate upon separation. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012880

    Original file (20110012880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not promoted to SGT during the period covered by this DD Form 214. c. He did not serve through 1965 during the period covered by his DD Form 214. d. He arrived in Germany on 18 April 1960 and remained in Germany through his release from active duty date on 5 November 1961, a period of 1 year, 6 months, and 27 days. With respect to his first DD Form 214 that covered his active duty from 6 November 1961 to 22 March 1963, the applicant will be provided with a copy of this form: a. He...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009976

    Original file (20120009976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant did not provide any evidence. However, his records contain two DA Forms 24 (Service Record) and a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), as follows: a. DA Form 24 covering the period 10 September 1962 to 2 September 1965 shows in Section 1 - Appointments, Promotions or Reduction the following grades and effective dates: * private (PVT)/E-1, 10 September 1962 * private (PVT)/E-2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006094

    Original file (20120006094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states effective 18 April 1961, at the request of his company commander, he served as a SGT/E-5, training SGT until his release from active duty on 6 July 1961. The evidence of record shows at the time the applicant was separated, on 6 July 1961, he held the rank of SP4/E-4 (T). The evidence of record does not show and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was promoted to SGT/E-5 prior to his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014056

    Original file (20140014056.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * DD Form 214 * Unit Orders Number 30, dated 21 March 1964 * Certificate of Achievement (COA) showing his rank as SGT/E-5 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It states that item 3a will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier's promotion/reduction/appointment orders. Based upon this evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his rank as SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019236

    Original file (20130019236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, and Reductions) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was promoted to SP5/E-5 (T) on 3 April 1964 and SP5/E-5 (P) on 3 April 1965. Army Regulation 624-200, effective 1 July 1962, section III, governed the temporary appointment of enlisted personnel of the active Army to pay grades E-4 through E-9 made against periodic temporary appointment quota allocations issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army. However, all evidence in his records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018089

    Original file (20140018089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * item 3a of his DD Form 214 shows his rank/pay grade as SP4/E-4 (temporary) * his rank/pay grade at the time of his discharge was SP5/E-5 * he was promoted to SP5/E-5 while serving on active duty 3. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge) from the U.S. Army effective 31 October 1969 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows he held the temporary rank of SP4/E-4 at the time he was released from active duty on 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012336

    Original file (20100012336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and his date of induction as 25 April 1965. This form indicates in Item 11 (Enlisted, Inducted, Reenlisted, Extended, and/or Ordered to Active Duty) he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 18 September 1968 for 2 years. The applicant's available records do not contain any documentary evidence showing he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006496

    Original file (20110006496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006496 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 (P) permanent. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012896

    Original file (20140012896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of active service and he had 4 days of lost time from 27 July to 30 July 1964. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...