Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019236
Original file (20130019236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019236 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was separated in the rank of sergeant (SGT) vice specialist five (SP5). 

2.  The applicant states he was never a specialist.  He was given the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214, ending on 11 May 1965
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* DA Form 8-238 (MSA-Invoice and Receipt)
* Standard Form 1012a (Travel Voucher - Memorandum)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 November 1961 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.00 (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He was honorably discharged in the rank/grade of private/E-2) on 30 May 1962 for the purpose of reenlistment. 

3.  He reenlisted in the Regular Army on 31 May 1962.  He subsequently served in Germany from April 1962 to May 1965.  He was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 34th Infantry Regiment. 

4.  Special Orders (SO) Number 171, issued by Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized) on 29 June 1963 advanced him to the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 (Temporary (T)).

5.  SO Number 94, issued by Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized) on 3 April 1964 advanced him to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 (T).  Item 32 (Classification in Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded primary MOS 941.10 (Cook) on 3 April 1964.

6.  On 3 April 1965, he was appointed to the permanent rank/grade of SP5/E-5 (P) in accordance with Army Regulation 624-200 (Appointment and Reduction of Enlisted Personnel).

7.  Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, and Reductions) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was promoted to SP5/E-5 (T) on 3 April 1964 and SP5/E-5 (P) on 3 April 1965.  

8.  Item 2 (Grade) of his DA Form 20 also shows his grade as SP5/E-5.  Item 33 (Record of Assignments) of this form shows his MOS as 941.10 beginning on     2 January 1964. 

9.  He was honorably released from active duty on 11 May 1965 and he was assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligations.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in:

* Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - SP5/E-5 see item 32 (Remarks)
* Item 3b (Date of Rank) - 3 April 1964
* Item 25a (Specialty Number and Title) - 941.10 Cook
* Item 32 - Date of Appointment: 3 April 1965

10.  On 20 July 1965, Headquarters, Department of the Army published SO Number 140 releasing him from assignment to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  The orders listed his rank/grade as SP5/E-5. 

11.  He provides a DA Form 8-238, dated 29 March 1965, and Standard Form 1012a, dated 19 May 1965, both of which listed his rank/grade as SGT/E-5. 

12.  Army Regulation 624-200, effective 1 July 1962, section III, governed the temporary appointment of enlisted personnel of the active Army to pay grades   E-4 through E-9 made against periodic temporary appointment quota allocations issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army.  Army Regulation 624-200 was superseded by chapter 7 of Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), effective March 1965.  Paragraphs 7-13 and 7-14 of Army Regulation 600-200 provided the same guidance as noted in Army Regulation 624-200.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was advanced to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 (T) on 3 April 1964. It appears he was promoted to fill a vacancy in MOS 941.10, and it appears that MOS 941.10 was not authorized an NCO grade.  He was appointed to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 (P) on 3 April 1965.  He contends that he was never a specialist.  However, all evidence in his records clearly shows his rank was SP5, not SGT. 

2.  The travel vouchers he provides listed his rank as SGT.  However, this listing would have been in response to what he identified himself as, and perhaps he was an acting SGT, but it is not what his records reflected.  

3.  In the absence of a promotion/advancement instrument (order) to SGT, there is insufficient evidence to grant him relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019236





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019236



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009976

    Original file (20120009976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant did not provide any evidence. However, his records contain two DA Forms 24 (Service Record) and a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), as follows: a. DA Form 24 covering the period 10 September 1962 to 2 September 1965 shows in Section 1 - Appointments, Promotions or Reduction the following grades and effective dates: * private (PVT)/E-1, 10 September 1962 * private (PVT)/E-2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011671

    Original file (20080011671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is acknowledged that there is some evidence of record to show the applicant may have performed the duties of an NCO. Unfortunately, there is no evidence of record to show that the applicant was recommended for promotion prior to his being hospitalized. There is no evidence of record to show why the medical facility commander did not promote the applicant; however, again, there is no evidence of record to show that he had been recommended for promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016291

    Original file (20090016291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This form also shows his rank as Specialist 2 (T) [temporary] with a date of rank of 19 December 1955. A copy of a noncommissioned officer (NCO)/specialist program appointment letter, dated 13 March 1957, states the applicant's personnel records indicated he converted to a specialist status on or about 1 July 1955; however, there was no record of his acceptance or declination of the rank designation. The applicant also states that he does not know what rank a SP5 is.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020457

    Original file (20130020457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) instead of specialist five (SP5) * he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010015

    Original file (20120010015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * letter of commendation, dated 1 July 1965 * endorsement to a letter of commendation, dated 12 August 1965 * photograph * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The letter of commendation lists his rank as SP5. Although there are some documents in his records that indicate his rank as SP5 (but his release from active duty orders are ambiguous, showing his rank as (“SP5/E4”), regrettably, without orders there is insufficient evidence to amend his DD Form 214 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004248

    Original file (20110004248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 September 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110004248 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Service members must be bona fide members of a unit participating in or be engaged in the direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive days (or 60 nonconsecutive days), provided this support involves entering the area of operations, or meet one or more of the following criteria: a. Although Army Regulation 600-8-22 designates Thailand as a U.S. Military Operation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017921

    Original file (20120017921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 and DD Form 215 show in: * Item 3 (SSN) the eighth digit is listed as "4" * Item 5a/5b (Grade, Rate, or Rank) specialist five (SP5) (T) temporary * Item 6 (Date of Rank) 17 February 1969 * Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge 4. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015437C071029

    Original file (20060015437C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a DA Form 137 dated on or about 9 August 1964 which shows his rank as SP5, E-5. His rank was listed as SP4 on this form. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014056

    Original file (20140014056.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * DD Form 214 * Unit Orders Number 30, dated 21 March 1964 * Certificate of Achievement (COA) showing his rank as SGT/E-5 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It states that item 3a will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier's promotion/reduction/appointment orders. Based upon this evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his rank as SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029894

    Original file (20100029894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 24 shows he was promoted to specialist four/E-4 (P) with a date of rank of 18 October 1964. The applicant's record contains a copy of DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data) dated 18 February 1965, item 5 (Grade and Pay Grade) which shows he completed the form and indicated his rank was "SGT E5." The applicant's record contains an original DA Form 603 (Army Reserve Change of Address Report), dated 7 September 1965, item 1 (Name, Address, Service No., Grade, Branch)...