Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014056
Original file (20140014056.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 May 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014056 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank as sergeant (SGT) vice specialist five (SP5). 

2.  He states his DD Form 214 is incorrect.  It currently shows that he separated as a specialist and his terminal rank was SGT/E-5.  He would like his rank corrected to ensure that his gravestone will be correct.  

3.  He provides:

* DD Form 214
* Unit Orders Number 30, dated 21 March 1964
* Certificate of Achievement (COA) showing his rank as SGT/E-5

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 8 September 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1.  

2.  Item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows he was advanced to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 (permanent) effective 19 September 1963, with a date of rank of 
5 January 1963. 



3.  Headquarters, 143rd Signal Battalion, Unit Orders Number 30, dated 
21 March 1964, show he was appointed to the temporary rank/grade of SGT/E-5 effective the date of the orders.  

4.  On 15 August 1964, he was issued a COA in recognition of outstanding service from 19 September 1963 to 15 August 1964.  The certificate listed his rank as SGT/E-5.  

5.  On 24 August 1964, he was honorably released from active duty.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 17 days of creditable active duty service.  His DD Form 214 shows in item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) "SP5/E-5 (T)."

6.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in orders.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that item 3a will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier's promotion/reduction/appointment orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant contends he held the rank of SGT vice SP5 prior to his release from active duty.  His records contain orders which support this contention.  Additionally, he has provided orders showing he was, in fact, appointed to the temporary rank of SGT on 21 March 1964, a date prior to his release from active duty.  Based upon this evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his rank as SGT.  He held pay grade E-5 at the time of his appointment to the rank of SGT; therefore, his date of rank as shown on his DD Form 214 remains the same as currently shown.







BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his
DD Form 214, item 3a to show "SGT/E-5 (T)."




      _______________X__________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004329



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014056



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019236

    Original file (20130019236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, and Reductions) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was promoted to SP5/E-5 (T) on 3 April 1964 and SP5/E-5 (P) on 3 April 1965. Army Regulation 624-200, effective 1 July 1962, section III, governed the temporary appointment of enlisted personnel of the active Army to pay grades E-4 through E-9 made against periodic temporary appointment quota allocations issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army. However, all evidence in his records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009976

    Original file (20120009976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant did not provide any evidence. However, his records contain two DA Forms 24 (Service Record) and a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), as follows: a. DA Form 24 covering the period 10 September 1962 to 2 September 1965 shows in Section 1 - Appointments, Promotions or Reduction the following grades and effective dates: * private (PVT)/E-1, 10 September 1962 * private (PVT)/E-2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010877

    Original file (20120010877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 3 (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank/pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist five (SP5)/E-5. His DD Form 214 indicates his temporary rank/pay grade as SP5/E-5 with a date of rank of 30 June 1966. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed to the temporary rank of SGT on 30 June 1966 and performed duties as a Shift Supervisor from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003815

    Original file (20120003815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held the permanent rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and he was entitled to pay at the E-5 rate upon separation. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009924

    Original file (20060009924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    X The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests in effect, correction of the rank and pay grade entered in Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his 9 January 1958 separation document (DD Form 214). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self Authored Statement; DD Form 214; Honorable Discharge Certificate; Discharge from United States Army Reserve, Letter Orders, dated 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006496

    Original file (20110006496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006496 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 (P) permanent. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017884

    Original file (20140017884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that his DD Form 214 correctly shows the rank/grade (i.e., SGT/E-5) that he held on the date he was REFRAD. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's discharge orders correctly show the rank/grade (i.e., SSGT/E-6) that he held on the date he was discharged from the USAR. Further, his military personnel records, including his DD Form 214 and USAR discharge orders, correctly show his rank/ grade at the time of his separation from active duty and also at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018089

    Original file (20140018089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * item 3a of his DD Form 214 shows his rank/pay grade as SP4/E-4 (temporary) * his rank/pay grade at the time of his discharge was SP5/E-5 * he was promoted to SP5/E-5 while serving on active duty 3. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge) from the U.S. Army effective 31 October 1969 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows he held the temporary rank of SP4/E-4 at the time he was released from active duty on 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011591

    Original file (20070011591.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record further shows that his grade is correctly reflected in Item 3a of his DD Form 214. Evidence of record further shows that PMOS 72M2P is correctly reflected in Item 25a of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to change the applicant's grade, MOS, and civilian occupation associated with this MOS; listing his certificate of achievement, letter of commendation, Soldier of the Month Award, and the Cold War...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002537C070205

    Original file (20060002537C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge documents should be corrected to show that he held that rank of sergeant/pay grade E-5 at the time of his separation from active duty and discharge from the Army Reserve because he was promoted shortly before he left Germany, but his promotion orders were not forwarded to him or the gaining command. In view of the foregoing and despite the absence of sergeant (E-5) promotion orders in the applicant's military personnel records,...