Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012336
Original file (20100012336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  4 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012336 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and his date of induction as 25 April 1965.

2.  The applicant states a Field Commissioner along with General Westmoreland flew to his work location in South Vietnam and promoted him to SGT/E-5.  Further, he contends the DD Form 62 (Statement of Acceptability), dated 19 April 1965, which found him "not acceptable" for induction is incorrect because in 1966 he attended basic training at Fort Benning, GA and he was subsequently transferred with Company A, 35th Engineer Battalion to the Republic of Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides the following:

* DD Form 62, dated 19 April 1965
* Basic Training Photograph
* 35th Engineer Battalion History
* International Certificates of Vaccination 
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 


or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A DD Form 62, dated 19 April 1965, as provided by the applicant, indicates he was found unacceptable for induction under the then current standards.

3.  The applicant's records contain the following documents:

	a.  DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) indicates that he had been previously examined and found unacceptable during pre-induction.  He was examined on 
17 September 1968, found acceptable, and inducted the following day; 

	b.  USAREC Form 180 (Acknowledgement of Service Obligation) signed by the applicant shows he acknowledged his induction on 18 September 1968;

	c.  Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station Special Orders Number 185, dated 18 September 1968, immediately assigned him to the U.S. Army Reception Station, Fort Benning, Georgia; and

	d.  DA 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), initiated on 24 September 1968, was last reviewed by him on 18 April 1970.  This form indicates in Item 11 (Enlisted, Inducted, Reenlisted, Extended, and/or Ordered to Active Duty) he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 18 September 1968 for 2 years.

4.  His records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 
13 February 1969 to 21 April 1970 with Company A, 35th Engineer Battalion (Combat).

5.  Company A, 35th Engineer Battalion (Combat), Unit Orders Number 40, and item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20, show he was appointed to the temporary grade of SP4/E-4 effective 20 June 1969.

6.  His records show he was honorably released from active duty on 24 April 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  Items 5a and 5b of the DD Form 214 show the entries "SP4" and "E-4" respectively.
7.  The applicant's available records do not contain any documentary evidence showing he was promoted to SGT/E-5.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It directed entry of the date of induction in Item 10c.

9.  Army Regulation 600-200, as in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures.  It stated commanders may appoint qualified Soldiers as acting sergeants/E-5 to serve in vacant positions in their units at their present or higher grade and acting noncommissioned officers are not entitled to pay and allowances for such higher grades.  In addition, it stated the promotion of enlisted personnel was announced in routine orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was inducted on 24 April 1965 and was a SGT/E-5.

2.  The DD Form 62 provided by the applicant simply shows that in 1965 he was found unacceptable for induction.  The evidence of record clearly shows he was subsequently inducted on 17 September 1968.  

3.  The evidence of record shows at the time of separation on 24 April 1970, he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.  His record is void of any documentation indicating he had been promoted to SGT/E-5 and/or held such rank at the time of his release from active duty.

4.  In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012336



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012336



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010066

    Original file (20100010066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was permanently promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 20 May 1965 in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1. However, his record does contains unit orders, dated 3 December 1966, that appointed him as an acting sergeant (E5).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012970

    Original file (20080012970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He claims he was promoted to SGT and received awards which were never documented in his record or on his DD Form 214. The record is void of any orders showing he was ever promoted to SGT by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 19 February 1968 through 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000510

    Original file (20110000510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000510 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Following his tour in Vietnam, the applicant was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA for duty with Company A, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry. Item 33 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following appointments and reductions: * PVT/E-1 on 5 February 1968 * PV2/E-2 on 12 April 1968 [accelerated promotion] * PFC/E-3 on 20 July 1968 * SP4/E-4 on 12 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002445

    Original file (20120002445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. His record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record does not show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000752

    Original file (20120000752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant provides: * Unit Orders Number 21, issued by Company C, 508th Military Police Battalion, Fort Riley, KS, dated 18 March 1970 * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends his military service records should be corrected to show he was promoted to SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027423

    Original file (20100027423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 February 1969 in the rank/grade of private/E-1 and he held military occupational specialty 94B (Cook). There are no orders in the applicant's record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence shows that at the time of discharge, on 18 February 1971, the applicant held the rank of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010152

    Original file (20100010152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his SSN and grade are incorrect and his service in Vietnam is not listed on his DD Form 214. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct SSN, correct rank/grade, and his service in Vietnam to include his awards. With respect to his Vietnam service, the evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 4 February 1968 to 9 January 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002258

    Original file (20090002258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: VSM with 4 bronze service stars, NDSM, RVNCM, PH, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. Therefore, these awards should also be added to his records at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006383C080213

    Original file (20070006383C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his Vietnam service, the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and his correct rank. This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 93d Engineer Battalion, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 3 August 1967 through 9 February 1970 by Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006383

    Original file (20070006383.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his Vietnam service, the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and his correct rank. This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 93d Engineer Battalion, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 3 August 1967 through 9 February 1970 by Department of the Army...