Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012560C071029
Original file (20070012560C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        2 October 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070012560


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano          |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Luis Almodova                 |     |Senior Analyst       |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Ann Campbell                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. LaVerne Douglas               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Jeffrey Redmann               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief
warrant officer five by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year
criteria.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was not considered for
promotion by the chief warrant officer five board held in April 2007.

3.  In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of his
orders (Permanent Orders 138-002, [publishing headquarters not visible]
dated 18 May 2007).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Based on a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined
the applicant was erroneously not considered by the 2007 Reserve Components
Selection Board and was eligible for consideration for promotion to chief
warrant officer five under the 2007 year criteria as an omission.

2.  Army Regulation 135-155, prescribes the policies and procedures for the
promotion of Reserve warrant officers.  This regulation specifies that
promotion consideration/reconsideration by a SSB may only be based on
erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at
the time of consideration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s records were erroneously not considered for promotion
to chief warrant officer five under the 2007 year criteria and should now
be submitted for appropriate SSB consideration for this purpose.

2.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be
appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:

___AC__  ___LD __  __JR____  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection
boards for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five under
the 2007 year criteria.

2.  That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was
promoted to chief warrant officer five on his date of eligibility, as
determined by appropriate Departmental officials, using the criteria
cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other
prerequisites for promotion.

3.  That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.




                                  _____Ann Campbell________
                                            CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20070012560                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20071002                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |131.0000                                |
|2.                      |131.0010                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010891

    Original file (20060010891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2006 year criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted special selection board for promotion consideration for chief warrant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011393C070205

    Original file (20060011393C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five (CW5) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2005 and 2006 year criteria. The evidence of records shows the applicant was serving in his additional MOS 153B at the time of the 2005 promotion board and the MOI for that board did not identify officers serving in MOS 153B for consideration. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011524C071029

    Original file (20070011524C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three by a special selection board (SSB) (Promotions Advisory Board) under the 2006, year criteria, and if necessary, the 2007 year criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010591C071029

    Original file (20070010591C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four (CWO-W4) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2006 year criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection boards for promotion consideration for chief...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013565C070205

    Original file (20060013565C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four (CW4) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2005 and 2006 year criteria. Based on a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered by the 2005 and 2006 Reserve Components Selection Boards and was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 under the 2005 and 2006 year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006144C071029

    Original file (20070006144C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The G-1 memorandum went on to state that the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components retains authority to grant military education waivers to requesting officers, but waivers must be granted under more restrictive conditions. The G-1 memorandum also stated that, in situations where the officer applying for a military education waiver does not meet the minimum conditions set out in paragraphs 2a through 2d, and the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components deems the case to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018748

    Original file (20070018748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states “I was not considered for selection to CW5 as a 420A Military Personnel Technician, although 420A is my primary MOS and I was in the promotion zone of consideration. On 1 April 2008, the Warrant Officer Branch, USAHRC-STL, confirmed to the Board analyst that the applicant's primary MOS is 420A and his additional MOS is 270A. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows that the applicant was not considered for promotion to CW5 based on the information that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011149

    Original file (20070011149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant's records show that he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) as a second lieutenant, effective 21 February 1988, with prior enlisted service. The AHRC, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, has recommended the applicant be granted a military education waiver and consideration by an SSB under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015105C070205

    Original file (20060015105C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three (CW3) by special selection boards (SSB). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection boards for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008985

    Original file (20070008985.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant states, in effect, that he recently received a memorandum from U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 16 April 2007 informing him that he was not selected for promotion to major by the Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) that convened on 8 January 2007, and that this was his second...