RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 2 October 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070010591
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano | |Director |
| |Mr. Luis Almodova | |Senior Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Ann Campbell | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. LaVerne Douglas | |Member |
| |Mr. Jeffrey Redmann | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief
warrant officer four (CWO-W4) by a special selection board (SSB) under the
2006 year criteria.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he is a Reservist on active duty.
He was omitted from the board last year because of his EAD (Entry on
Active Duty Date). The Reserve thought he was active duty and the Regular
Army thought he was a Reservist on extended active duty. He was due to pin
on CW4 on 30 March 2007. He now requests a special selection board to
correct this.
3. The applicant adds, in effect, he should have been included in the
April 2006 board for promotion to CW4 in March 2007. Once he found out he
had been omitted, he spoke to the appropriate individuals at the Pentagon,
and at the Human Resources Command, in St. Louis, Missouri, who stated it
was because of his EAD. All indicated that this was a problem that
affected a few and that it could be corrected with a special board.
4. In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of orders
stating he is on active duty.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Based on a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined
the applicant was erroneously not considered by the 2006 Selection Boards
and was eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer
four under the 2006 year criteria as an omission.
2. Army Regulation 135-155, prescribes the policies and procedures for the
promotion of Reserve warrant officers. This regulation specifies that
promotion consideration/reconsideration by a SSB may only be based on
erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at
the time of consideration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records were erroneously not considered for promotion
to chief warrant officer four under the 2006 year criteria and should now
be submitted for appropriate SSB consideration for this purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be
appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
__amc___ __LD____ ___JR___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection
boards for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four under
the 2006 year criteria.
2. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was
promoted to chief warrant officer four on his date of eligibility, as
determined by appropriate Departmental officials, using the criteria
cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other
prerequisites for promotion.
3. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
____Ann M. Campbell___________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20070010591 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20071002 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |131.0000 |
|2. |131.1100 |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013565C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four (CW4) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2005 and 2006 year criteria. Based on a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered by the 2005 and 2006 Reserve Components Selection Boards and was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 under the 2005 and 2006 year...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013271C080407
The applicant states, in effect, that he believes he was not selected for promotion to CW4 because several key documents were missing from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and the record reviewed by the Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) in March 2007. This official further states that based on these omissions, the applicant is eligible for promotion consideration by a DA Promotion Advisory Board (PAB), and it is recommended the applicant be granted PAB consideration under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007903
The applicant states My eligibility for promotion to CW4 was not considered by the April 18-23, 2008 promotion Board. The applicant should have been considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2008 promotion selection board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted Special Selection Board for consideration for Reserve promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Four under the 2008...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011637
The applicant requests, in effect, consideration for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Five (CW5) by a Department of the Army Promotion Advisory Board under the 2006 criteria. The advisory opinion states the applicants file was omitted from the 2006 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board for promotion to CW5 and that he is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW5 by a Department of the Army Promotion Advisory Board. If the applicant is selected for promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009527C070208
The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resource Command (AHRC) – St. Louis reviewed the applicant’s record and determined he was erroneously not considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 and 2002 RCSBs, and that he was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 2001 and 2002 CW4 RCSB selection criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. If selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010891
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2006 year criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted special selection board for promotion consideration for chief warrant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010159C070206
Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted SSB for promotion consideration for CW4 under the 2005 criteria.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060016760C071029
The available records indicate that the applicant's completed his education requirement on 18 April 2006. While it is the applicant's responsibility to complete his promotion educational requirement in a timely manner and to ensure that this records are complete at the time of promotion consideration, the applicant's contention that his Certificate of Training for the successful completion of the AWOAC was not in his file at the time that he was considered for promotion to CW4 is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015705
The applicant requests, in effect, consideration for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Four (CW4) by a Department of the Army (DA) Promotion Advisory Board under the 2009 criteria. The applicant provides a Certificate of Training; memoranda, dated 25 September 2009 and 3 March 2009; a Promotion List for CW3 and CW4, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Component; a letter, dated 13 August 2009, from the Army Review Boards Agency; and his initial application, dated 17 July 2009, in support of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011524C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three by a special selection board (SSB) (Promotions Advisory Board) under the 2006, year criteria, and if necessary, the 2007 year criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted...