RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 March 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010891
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz
Acting Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Ms. Kathleen Newman
Chairperson
Mr. David K. Haasenritter
Member
Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2006 year criteria.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion packet was omitted from the 2006 promotion board consideration list.
3. The applicant provides copies of his Officer Record Brief and his officer evaluation reports for the periods ending 16 May 2004, 16 November 2004, and 16 November 2005, in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Based on a review of the applicants records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered by the 2006 Reserve Components Selection Board and was eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer five under the 2006 year criteria as an omission.
2. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion consideration/
reconsideration by a SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants records were erroneously not considered for promotion to chief warrant officer five under the 2006 year criteria and should now be submitted for appropriate SSB consideration for this purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicants records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
__DKH__ _LMD___ ___KAN__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted special selection board for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five under the 2006 year criteria.
2. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to chief warrant officer five on his date of eligibility, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials, using the 2006 year criteria, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.
3. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
______K. A. Newman___
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20060010891
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
20070320
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
131.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011393C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five (CW5) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2005 and 2006 year criteria. The evidence of records shows the applicant was serving in his additional MOS 153B at the time of the 2005 promotion board and the MOI for that board did not identify officers serving in MOS 153B for consideration. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012560C071029
Jeffrey Redmann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection boards for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five under the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011524C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three by a special selection board (SSB) (Promotions Advisory Board) under the 2006, year criteria, and if necessary, the 2007 year criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015105C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three (CW3) by special selection boards (SSB). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection boards for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010591C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four (CWO-W4) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2006 year criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection boards for promotion consideration for chief...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013565C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four (CW4) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2005 and 2006 year criteria. Based on a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered by the 2005 and 2006 Reserve Components Selection Boards and was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 under the 2005 and 2006 year...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006144C071029
The G-1 memorandum went on to state that the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components retains authority to grant military education waivers to requesting officers, but waivers must be granted under more restrictive conditions. The G-1 memorandum also stated that, in situations where the officer applying for a military education waiver does not meet the minimum conditions set out in paragraphs 2a through 2d, and the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components deems the case to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008985
The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant states, in effect, that he recently received a memorandum from U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 16 April 2007 informing him that he was not selected for promotion to major by the Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) that convened on 8 January 2007, and that this was his second...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005727C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, a civilian education waiver and promotion consideration to captain by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2004 criteria. On 23 April 2004, he submitted an application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) and requested a waiver of the civilian education and special board consideration for promotion to captain. Therefore, based on the circumstances presented, the officer's deployment and redeployment in support of Operation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015716
An officer selected for promotion under the stipulation who had a promotion eligibility date (PED) prior to the approval date of the board criteria for which he/she was selected was granted the approval date of the board as his/her DOR. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the August 2004 SSB under the 2003 criteria. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he...