Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005996C070206
Original file (20050005996C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        8 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050005996


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Fowler             |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Stanley Kelley                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Diane J. Armstrong            |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Delia R. Trimble              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his reenlistment date be
changed to October 1999 so that he may be eligible to receive a
reenlistment bonus.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that prior to his reenlistment he was
an 11B3V in Zone B (reenlistments between 6 and 10 years of active
service).  He further states the bonus 2B for Military Occupational
Specialty (MOS) 11B3V was available but he was unaware of his eligibility
or that he could reenlist outside of his window to receive the bonus for
MOS 11B3V.  He concludes if he had known he was eligible he would have
reenlisted for 6 years in October 1999 and received the bonus.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document-
Armed Forces of the United States), dated 25 September 2000.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 August 1991.  He was
promoted to SSG, E-6 on 1 March 1998 in MOS 11B3V.

2.  By memorandum dated 29 October 1999, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command
(PERSCOM) informed the applicant that his request for voluntary
reclassification from 11B to 79S was approved.

3.  DA Forms 2166-7 (Non-commissioned Officer Evaluation Report) for the
periods January 1999 through December 1999, January 2000 through May 2000,
and June 2000 through May 2001 show that the applicant served as a
Battalion Career Counselor during the above rating periods.

4.  A DD Form 4/1 dated 25 September 2000, item B (Agreements) shows that
the applicant agreed to a 5 year regular reenlistment with no bonus
entitlement.

5.  In the processing of the case, an advisory opinion was obtained from
the Army Human Resources Command (AHRC).  AHRC stated in accordance with
Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) to receive a bonus the
Soldier must: reenlist for continued active duty in the primary MOS held at
discharge or in an MOS within the normal line of progression for the
primary MOS held at discharge.  The advisory opinion stated that MOS 79S
shows on his NCOERs from January 1999 through May 2001.

6.  The advisory opinion further stated that MOS 79S is not the normal line
of progression for MOS 11B and he was not eligible for an 11B3V B Zone
bonus in October 1999 or in September 2000.

7.  Paragraph 5-12 of Army Regulation 601-280 states that the purposes of
the Enlisted Bonus (EB), Broken Service Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(BSSRB), and Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) programs are to induce
Soldiers to enlist or reenlist in critical MOSs and serve in those MOSs for
the entire time of the enlistment or reenlistment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant served in MOS 79S prior to
October 1999.  The advisory opinion states that MOS 79S is not the normal
progression for MOS 11B.  He voluntarily reclassified into MOS 79S on
29 October 1999.  Presumably, he initiated his request prior to October
1999.  The purpose of the reenlistment bonus is to induce Soldiers to
enlist or reenlist in critical MOSs and serve in those MOSs for the entire
time of the enlistment or reenlistment.

2.  There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence which
shows the September 2000 reenlistment is inaccurate or that he met the
regulatory criteria for reenlistment in October 1999 for an enlistment
bonus in MOS 11B.  Based on the applicable regulation, the reenlistment is
correct as constituted and the applicant has failed to meet the burden of
proof to change his reenlistment.  Therefore, there is no basis for change
of the contested reenlistment.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__SK  ___  __ DJA  _  __ DRT _  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____ Stanley Kelley ____
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050005996                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |8 November 2005                         |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.0200.0000                           |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061372C070421

    Original file (2001061372C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be paid a 1.5A bonus under the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) program in conjunction with his reenlistment on 25 July 2001. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000126C070205

    Original file (20060000126C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E which shows, in pertinent part, the applicant's eligibility for a reenlistment bonus, that the terms of the applicant's reenlistment were acknowledged, and that he would receive a total bonus of $2,000. This document shows, in pertinent, that the applicant was qualified to serve in the duty position, that he remained entitled to his SRIP reenlistment bonus, and that the authority for the transfer was NGR 600-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005895C070206

    Original file (20050005895C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that he be authorized payment of an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) reenlistment bonus. The applicant provides two letters of support, a copy of his reenlistment contract, and a copy of the message authorizing a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for AGR personnel effective 1 January 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056611C070420

    Original file (2001056611C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 20 March 2000, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant be discharged with an Honorable Discharge Certificate. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079741C070215

    Original file (2002079741C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of her remaining Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitled to her in accordance with regulation. The applicant's DA Form 3340 (Request for Regular Army Reenlistment or Extension), dated 13 March 1991, shows that she reenlisted for the second time for a period of 6 years to satisfy her service remaining requirement for the AMEDD College Program. The applicant provided a copy of memorandum from the OTSG, dated 3 December 1991, Subject: Release from the AMEDD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063226C070421

    Original file (2001063226C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be paid a 1.5B Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in conjunction with his reenlistment on 31 July 2001. The applicant’s military records show that he initially served in the Regular Army from October 1985 to July 1988. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was eligible for and was authorized a 1.5B SRB at the time of his reenlistment on 31 July 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007515C070205

    Original file (20060007515C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Karmin S. Jenkins | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This official stated that a request for grade determination for the purpose of enlistment in the RA was approved in the grade of E-5, provided the applicant was otherwise qualified and enlists for retraining in MOS 88M under Option 3 (U. S. Army Training of Choice Enlistment Option only – No First Assignment could be guaranteed). The applicant's military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058736C070421

    Original file (2001058736C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records were not provided to the Board. However, since there is no evidence that the applicant was informed that he had the option of requesting discharge, and the time to do so has expired, the Board will recommend that he now be provided that option. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by providing the individual concerned 60 days from the date of this document to request discharge as a result of his defective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009386C070206

    Original file (20050009386C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that he be allowed to retake the Armed Forces Qualifying Test (AFQT) so that he can qualify for an enlistment bonus and the loan repayment program. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) does not authorize AFQT retesting for the sole purpose of qualifying an applicant for an enlistment incentive.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017978

    Original file (20140017978.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Annex E shows he acknowledged: * he was enlisting for MOS 11B which had been identified as eligible for a $20,000.00 critical MOS and for unit identification code (UIC) WQNMB0, Troop B, 1st Battalion, 150th Armored Reconnaissance Squadron, paragraph number 102, line number 004 * he would receive 50 percent of the bonus, less taxes, upon completion of initial active duty for training and he was awarded the MOS for which he enlisted * he would receive the final bonus payment, less taxes,...