| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry | Member | |
| Mr. Eric N. Anderson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his debt for recoupment of his Selected Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived.
APPLICANT STATES: After he reenlisted his wife had to return home to Massachusetts. She was being medically discharged for pregnancy. He was unable to find a reserve unit there and was unable to be there with her. He received no support and, as the doctor stated, he was in an emotionally and mentally disabled state of mind.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records are not available. The information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 September 1996. He was honorably discharged on 30 June 1999 for the purpose of reenlisting on 1 July 1999, apparently for 5 years. He received an SRB in the total amount of $17,852.40.
On 14 February 2000, a mental status evaluation diagnosed the applicant with Personality Disorder, not otherwise specified (borderline, anti-social, passive-aggressive traits). The evaluating psychologist noted that although the applicant’s initial distress appeared to be directly related to his separation from his wife, further evaluation found him to have chronic feelings of insecurity and inferiority. He was found to have the mental capacity to understand and participate in proceedings and to be mentally responsible. He was psychiatrically cleared for any action deemed appropriate by his command and to meet the psychiatric criteria for separation in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13.
On 9 March 2000, the applicant’s commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13, Personality Disorder.
On 10 March 2000, the applicant waived consulting counsel and acknowledged notification of the action. He elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 20 March 2000, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant be discharged with an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
On 30 March 2000, the applicant was discharged, with an honorable characterization of service, in pay grade E-4, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13, personality disorder. He had completed 3 years, 6 months, and 8 days of creditable active service with no lost time. He was discharged owing the Government $7,047.00 as a result of unearned SRB payments.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 5-13, sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members with a personality disorder (not amounting to a disability) that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty when so diagnosed by a physician trained in psychiatry and psychiatric diagnosis or a doctoral-level clinical psychologist with the necessary and appropriate professional credentials who is privileged to conduct mental health evaluations for Department of defense components.
Army Regulation 601-280 prescribes criteria for the Total Army Retention Program. In pertinent part it states that the SRB Program is a retention incentive aid to soldiers in certain selected military occupational specialties (MOSs) who reenlist for a minimum of 3 years. The objective of the SRB Program is to increase the number of reenlistments in critical MOSs that do not have adequate retention levels to man the career force. The total amount of the bonus is computed based upon the monthly basic pay times years, or fractions of a year, of additional obligated service times the SRB multiplier. A soldier who voluntarily, or because of misconduct, fails to complete the obligated service for which an SRB was paid will refund a percent of the SRB equal to the percent of obligated service not performed. The servicing finance office will perform the recoupment of the portion of the bonus before the soldier’s discharge. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service will provide a current listing of separation program designator codes that may be recouped to all local finance offices.
The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, paragraph 090403 states that, for the purpose of recouping any unearned portions of an enlistment or reenlistment bonus, the term “who voluntarily or because of misconduct” includes (but is not limited to) soldiers separated for a number of listed reasons such as entry level performance and conduct and unsatisfactory performance. It also includes reasons as directed by the Secretary of the Military Department concerned in individual cases including pregnancy, parenthood, and personality disorder (an administrative discharge).
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant was diagnosed with a personality disorder. He was psychiatrically cleared for any action deemed appropriate by his command and to have met the psychiatric criteria for separation in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13. His administrative separation for personality disorder was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
3. Since the applicant was administratively discharged and not found to have any medical condition that required processing through the physical disability processing system, his SRB was appropriately recouped. Since he did not fulfill the service obligation required to earn the full amount of the SRB, it would not be appropriate to cancel or waive this debt.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rvo___ __hof___ __ena___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056611 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010726 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.05 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01674 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed from “Pregnancy” to “Medically Disqualified not for Cause.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002297
On 1 December 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation), paragraph 5-13 by reason of a personality disorder. Based on the Army G-1 advisory opinion and the memorandum from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, it would be in the interest of justice to correct the record to show that the applicant requested and was granted a waiver of recoupment for the amount of $1,607.94. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008382
The applicant provides: a. On 6 May 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder. Based on the Army G-1 opinion and the in the interest of justice, it would now be appropriate to correct the record to show that applicant requested and was granted a waiver of recoupment of his unearned portion of his bonus incentive prior to his discharge from the Army.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06099-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that the reason for his discharge and reenlistment code be changed. Since the error resulted in recoupment of the unearned portion of his reenlistment bonus, Petitioner’s record should be corrected, where appropriate to show that he is entitled to keep the SRB payments he received before his discharge on 31 December 2003.The Board further concludes that this...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00533
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00533 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reentry code be changed and recoupment of the unserved portion of his enlistment bonus be waived. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to the applicant’s mental health evaluations, extracted from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05958-97
1552' (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, be corrected by changing the reason for discharge or, in the alternative, that the record be corrected to show that the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was not recouped. portion of my...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015880
The advisory opinion further indicates that regarding cases when Soldiers are separated for an unfulfilled contract or in doubtful cases, commanders have the option to request a waiver of recoupment provisions. Memoranda provided by the applicant's chain of command and career counselor both concur that the Department of the Army breached the terms of the applicant's reenlistment contract; therefore, the applicant is not obligated to repay the reenlistment bonus. Considering there is no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054961C070420
Her enlistment physical examination dated 19 June 1998 showed that she was initially not qualified for enlistment due to overweight (63 inches and 186 pounds). Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. In pertinent part it states that the enlistment bonus (EB) is an enlistment incentive offered to those enlisting in the Regular Army for duty in a specific MOS.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00647 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code be changed. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was administratively separated due to an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and traits of a personality disorder. On...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005807C070206
Separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when disability separation processing through the Army’s PDES is warranted. This official further states that the governing regulation is currently being staffed with a revision that would not authorize bonus recoupment in personality disorder cases. The evidence of record, as established in the original Record of Proceedings issued by the Board in October 2004, confirms the applicant’s separation processing was accomplished in...