| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Eric N. Andersen | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid to him in accordance with the terms of his contract.
3. The applicant states that he signed a valid contract with the Army and the Army has to honor its portion of that contract.
4. The applicant's military records were not provided to the Board. The following information was derived from documents provided by the applicant himself.
5. On 26 June 2000 he immediately reenlisted for 3 years for SRB 0.5. At that time he had 2 years, 1 month and 4 days of active service.
6. Army Regulation 601-280 establishes the policies and provision for the Army retention program. In pertinent part it states that the SRB program is a retention incentive paid to soldiers in certain selected Military Occupational Specialties (MOS's) who reenlist for a minimum of 3 years. The objective of the SRB program is to increase the number of reenlistments in critical MOSs that do not have adequate retention levels to man the career force. Three zones have been established under the SRB program. They are zone A, which applies to soldiers between 21 months and 6 years of active service, zone B for those soldiers between 6 and 10 years, and zone C, which applies to soldiers between 10 and 14 years of active service. Within each zone a multiplier between .5 and 6 is established based on the eligible MOS. The amount of the bonus is determined by multiplying the soldiers monthly basic pay times the period of reenlistment (excluding any service obligation remaining from a previous enlistment/reenlistment) times the SRB zone multiplier, or $20,000, which ever is the lesser amount. A soldier may be paid an SRB only once within each zone of eligibility.
7. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM). The PERSCOM stated that in order for a soldier to be eligible for an SRB he or she must have a total of at least 6 years of service at the newly established Expiration of Term of Service (ETS). In the applicant’s case, his reenlistment will give him 5 years, 1 month and 4 days of active service at his new ETS. The PERSCOM stated that the applicant could request to change his term of reenlistment to 4 years which would give him the required 6 years of active service at his ETS (thereby making him eligible for his SRB), or he can request separation for an unfulfilled reenlistment commitment. The applicant was provided this advisory opinion and responded that since he
must comply with the terms of his enlistment contract, the Army must also comply with the contract.
8. The Comptroller General of the United States has ruled in similar cases that although a service member may have been misinformed about his entitlements, the Government is not liable for erroneous actions of its officers, agents, or employees in the performance of their official duties.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 7 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for defective enlistments, reenlistments and extensions. However, the soldier must request separation within 30 days of discovering the defective nature of the enlistment (paragraph 7-16e). This chapter also provides the authority for the affected soldier to waive the defective enlistment and serve his or her enlistment without the promised incentive.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was erroneously allowed to execute an SRB addendum because he did not reenlist for the required years of service.
2. Army Regulations provide for the discharge of a soldier who is promised an enlistment incentive which the Army cannot fulfill. However, there is no evidence that the applicant had been advised of that option.
3. The PERSCOM has offered the applicant an opportunity to renegotiate his reenlistment contract so he would have sufficient years of service at his ETS to qualify for his SRB. The applicant has declined this option.
4. The Board corrects errors or injustice which are not amenable to administrative correction. In this case the applicant was offered a method to qualify for the SRB he was promised. The Board will not use its authority to circumvent the requirement for a soldier to earn the benefits provided by the Army. However, since there is no evidence that the applicant was informed that he had the option of requesting discharge, and the time to do so has expired, the Board will recommend that he now be provided that option.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by providing the individual concerned 60 days from the date of this document to request discharge as a result of his defective enlistment in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 7-16.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
___rvo __ ___teo __ ____ena GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
________Raymond V. O'Connor____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001058736 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010927 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.05 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080230C070215
In so doing, they stated that the applicant’s MOS (98C) did not qualify for a BSSRB and offered that he could request separation based on an unfulfilled enlistment contract. PERSCOM again stated that the applicant could request separation based on an unfulfilled enlistment contract. The applicant met his enlistment obligations in full and the Army should honor the promise made to the applicant in his enlistment contract by awarding him the BSSRB as an exception to policy.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076592C070215
The Member of Congress was further informed that the applicant could get out of the Army "based on an unfulfilled enlistment contract or he can choose to accept his enlistment without the BSSRB." In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) Retention Management Division, which opined that the applicant had been improperly informed that he would receive a BSSRB because he was not eligible and did not meet the criteria...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209
The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicants reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006745C070205
The evidence of record includes the applicant's reenlistment contract of 23 June 2005, which contains a Statement of Understanding that confirms he was guaranteed the Enlistment Program/Option 9C/470, which was a broken service prior service SRB. Both these enlistment contract documents were authenticated by the guidance counselor on 23 June 2005, the date the applicant reenlisted and reentered active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061372C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be paid a 1.5A bonus under the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) program in conjunction with his reenlistment on 25 July 2001. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009222C070206
Qawly A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant, an Army Reserve Staff Sergeant completed a 1 year, 11 months, and 29 day tour of active duty on 25 January 2005. The applicant's reenlistment documents, but especially the "AGR Reenlistment Control Number", the "AGR Bonus Control Number", and the wording of the DA Form 4789 clearly show that he contracted to receive the SRB and that this action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013472
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides an Eligibility Bonus Work Sheet for AGR Bonus for Indefinite, undated, wherein it shows his adjusted basic active service date (BASD) was 30 August 2000, his ETS date had been 23 August 2006, he would reach 18 years of service on 30 August 2018, and the total time he would be paid the SRB was for 12 years and 7 days of service (date of 18 years of service minus reenlistment date, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008516
The advisory opinion states that the applicant received a Zone A bonus for his reenlistment on 21 December 2005 which disqualifies him for a Zone A bonus on his 29 April 2008 reenlistment. The evidence clearly shows the applicant reenlisted in good faith with the understanding he was eligible for the AGR SRB based on the authorized effective date of his reenlistment, 21 December 2008. In view of the foregoing, and in the interest of justice, it would be appropriate to correct the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075456C070403
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be reenlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) and that he be provided his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments. He enlisted in the Army Reserve on 18 July 1992, for a period of 3 years with an established expiration of term of service (ETS) of 17 July 1995. A VSI recipient must remain eligible for retention or reenlistment in the Ready Reserve by maintaining Army weight standards, completing a military physical examination every five...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091732C070212
He enlisted in the Army Reserve on 16 April 1992, for a period of 3 years with an established ETS of 15 April 1995. On 17 April 2001 the applicant was discharged. The applicant is authorized to receive VSI payments each year until 15 April 2014 if he qualifies and continues to reenlist.