Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090163C070212
Original file (2003090163C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 15 JANUARY 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003090163


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Gale J. Thomas Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Allen L. Raub Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his temporary duty (TDY) status served in Vietnam.

2. The applicant states that he was TDY in Vietnam in 1966, and that he is assembling his awards and decorations for his family members and wishes to reflect his brief presence in Vietnam.

3. The applicant provides a statement of support from a former civilian employee attesting to the applicant’s temporary tour in Vietnam.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on
30 November 1967. The application submitted in this case is dated 16 April 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant on 5 October 1945, in the Army of the United States, and entered active duty on 20 August 1949. He served continuously until his retirement as a lieutenant colonel on 30 November 1967.

4. Item 17 of his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) states that the applicant’s last tours of duty for the period in question was Fort Shafter, Hawaii, and Sandia Base, New Mexico. There is no indication of service in Vietnam.

5. The applicant’s 13 February 1966, Officer Efficiency Report contains a statement that because of his expertise in target intelligence, a request was made for him to be sent TDY to Vietnam to assist in the organization of a targets section. However, there is no confirmation that those orders were ever executed.

6. The only TDY orders in the applicant’s available records are those issued on 2 June 1966, with a report date of 12 June 1966 to Johnston Island, Hawaii. There are no TDY orders in the applicant’s records for Vietnam.


7. A statement provided by the applicant from one of his former employees states “that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the applicant was unexpectedly issued travel orders to Vietnam, sometime during the first quarter of 1966.”

8. Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, established the policies and provisions for the preparation of separation documents. It states that information in item 24c (Foreign Service) will be extracted from item 17 of the officer’s
DA Form 66. There is no information in item 17, of his DA Form 66 concerning service in Vietnam.

9. The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to individuals who serve on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days in Vietnam.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. There is no evidence in the applicant’s available records nor did he provide documentation to substantiate his claim that he was TDY to Vietnam. The statement provided by the applicant from one of his former employees is insufficient to verify his service in Vietnam.

2. Although the applicant is assembling his awards and decorations and wishes to reflect his brief time in Vietnam, his service in Vietnam can not be confirmed, and even if he would have served briefly in Vietnam he would not be entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 30 November 1967; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 29 November 1970. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP__ __ALR __ __WDP__ DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.




                  __Margaret K. Patterson__
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003090163
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016980

    Original file (20120016980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record contains no permanent change of station orders, TDY orders, or any other official documents that shows he was ordered to or served in Vietnam from September to December 1966. Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that item 18f shows the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024003

    Original file (20100024003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 November 2009, the Board granted him partial relief in that the evidence did not confirm his exact dates or length of service in Vietnam but there was sufficient evidence to conclude he served in Vietnam which entitled him to the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to USASA - Pacific. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001298

    Original file (20090001298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 17 (Foreign Service) shows he served in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) in the Republic of Korea from 19 April 1967 through 23 February 1968; in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 27 January through 3 April 1969; and in Hawaii from 4 April through 22 June 1969. c. Item 18 (Record of Assignments), in pertinent part, shows the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th Battalion, 1st Infantry, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, and served in MOS 8510 (Combat Artist) while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018138

    Original file (20140018138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 May 1966 to 24 April 1968. Aside from the entry on his DD Form 214 pertaining to him being an overseas returnee from USARPAC, there is no evidence in his service records and he did not provide any substantiating evidence that shows he served in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01188

    Original file (BC-2004-01188.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01188 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). On 27 April 2004, HQ AFPC/DPAPP1 requested the applicant provide any documents to verify he was TDY in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00170

    Original file (BC 2013 00170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00170 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Southeast Asian, Japan and Samoa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00170

    Original file (BC-2013-00170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00170 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Southeast Asian, Japan and Samoa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090175C070212

    Original file (2003090175C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was assigned to the Eighth US Army Band in Korea and arrived there on 24 July 1966. The applicant served overseas in Korea, Germany, and Italy. There is no evidence, and the applicant provided none, to show that he served in Vietnam on either a TDY or any other basis during his tenure on active duty in the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016737C070206

    Original file (20050016737C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 12 October 1970, the date of the FSM's discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) covering the period 1 September 1966 through 12 October 1970 shows: a. the FSM was ordered to ACDUTRA on 9 January 1967 with a reporting date of 26 January 1967; b. the FSM completed basic combat training (BCT) and advanced individual training (AIT), in MOS 71H...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247

    Original file (BC-2011-01247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...