Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016980
Original file (20120016980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  16 April 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120016980 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of records to show he completed two periods of service in Vietnam.  

2.  The applicant states he was sent to Vietnam in a temporary duty (TDY) status from 8 September to 20 December 1966.  He lost or misplaced his TDY orders and he would like to have them replaced.  There were approximately 25 to 30 men on the orders.  He was an IWCS [Integrated Wideband Communications System] Field Inspector.  He received a certificate of achievement from Brigadier General (BG) RDT. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Correspondence from his Member of Congress
* Former application to this Board
* Request for promotion determination
* General Orders (GO) Number 151 (promotion)
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* Special Orders (SO) Number 153 (amendment of reporting date)
* Multiple DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty/Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge/Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States))
* SO Number 71 (promotion to staff sergeant)
* Multiple Transcripts of Military Service
* SO Number 65 (temporary appointment to sergeant first class)
* SO Number 87 (discharge orders)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for 2 years on 3 August 1950 and he held a communications military occupational specialty. He was honorably released from active duty on 17 December 1952.  

3.  After a break in service, he enlisted in the RA on 31 May 1955.  He served through multiple reenlistments in a variety of stateside and overseas assignments which are listed on his DA Form 20 as:

* U.S. Army South (USARSO), Ethiopia, 15 November 1955 to 15 April 1958
* USARSO, Turkey, 11 May 1959 to 16 February 1960
* U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR), Germany, 30 September 1961 to 19 September 1964
* USAREUR, Germany, 10 July 1967 to 17 March 1968
* U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC), Vietnam, 9 May 1968 to 5 May 1969
* USARPAC, Korea, October 1965 to April 1966

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to the following units on:

* 9 January 1965, Headquarters Company, U.S. Army Strategic Communications Command (USASTRATCOM) – Continental United States (CONUS), Suitland, MD
* 4 June 1967, Headquarters STRATCOM - CONUS, Washington, DC
* 11 July 1967, 229th Signal Company, USASTRATCOM, Europe
* 1 December 1967, Company A, 72nd Signal Battalion, STRATCOM Europe
* 17 March 1968, enroute to USARPAC
* 24 May 1968, Company A, 29th Signal Battalion, Vietnam – USARPAC
5.  On 31 March 1974, he retired and he was placed on the Retired List on 1 April 1974.  His retirement DD Form 214, covering the period 4 June 1967 to 31 March 1974 shows in:

* Item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) – "01 08 05"
* Item 19 (Indochina or Korea Service Since August 5, 1964) Korea from October 1965 through April 1966, Vietnam 9 May 1968 through 5 May 1969
* item 27 (Remarks) and service in Germany from 10 July 1967 to 17 March 1968 and Vietnam 9 May 1968 to 5 May 1969

6.  His service records contain a Certificate of Achievement, signed by BG RDT that reads:

[Applicant], 1st Signal Brigade (USSTRATCOM), Army Post Office (APO), San Francisco, in recognition of meritorious service for the period of 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966 while serving in the capacity of IWCS Contractor Field Inspector.  You demonstrated great technical knowledge and devotion to duty.  Your performance of duty reflects great credit upon yourself, IWCS, and the United States Army

7.  His service record contains no permanent change of station orders, TDY orders, or any other official documents that shows he was ordered to or served in Vietnam from September to December 1966.

8.  According to declassified Operational Report – Lessons Learned, 1st Signal Brigade (USSTRATCOM), APO San Francisco, 96307 (Vietnam), for the quarterly period ending on 31 January 1967, the 1st Signal Brigade continued the operations of communications-electronics support of U.S. Forces in Vietnam and Thailand.  The brigade had assets/personnel in multiple locations in Vietnam such as Qui Nhon, An Khe, Pleiku, Long Binh, Cam Ranh Bay, and Da Nang.  It also had assets in Thailand including Korat, Bangkok, and Bangpla.  The 1st Signal Brigade was formed in April 1966 and arrived in Southeast Asia to assume command of all Army communications-electronic resources in Vietnam and Thailand. 

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that item 18f shows the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater service was performed, e.g., USAREUR [U.S. Army Europe].  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no TDY orders in the applicant's service records to support his contention of TDY travel to Vietnam from September to December 1966. Recreating such orders is not a record correction; it is neither viable nor practical. His records contain a certificate of achievement in recognition of his service as an IWCS Contractor Field Inspector from 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966.  However, in the absence of additional evidence, it is unknown if this service was served in Thailand, Vietnam, or Hawaii.  

2.  In the absence of permanent change of station or TDY orders; other official documents such as TDY settlement vouchers or leave and earnings statements showing receipt of hazardous duty pay; or witness statements, regretfully, there is insufficient evidence to support adding a second period of service in Vietnam to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

 _x____  __x______  _____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120016980



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120016980



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019976

    Original file (20130019976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction of records to show he performed temporary duty (TDY) in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show he performed TDY in the RVN during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966 was carefully reconsidered. However, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his records to show this period of foreign service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009856

    Original file (20090009856.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Thailand from 22 August 1968 through 9 August 1969, and in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 1 October 1969 through 18 September 1970; c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned to the: (1) U.S. Army Strategic Communications Command (USASTRATCOM) Facility, Korat [Thailand] from 26 August through 9 September 1968; (2) USASTRATCOM Facility, Korat [Thailand] and attached to the Command Communications Control Center (CCCC) [Thailand] from 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017075

    Original file (20080017075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) based on his service in Thailand. By regulation, the VSM and RVNCM are authorized for members who served in Thailand in units providing direct support to Republic of Vietnam (RVN) operations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is eligible for the VSM and RVNCM with Device (1960) based on his service in Thailand;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007772

    Original file (20080007772.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military service records to show the units he was assigned to while serving in U.S. Army Pacific and all of his awards and decorations. The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the U.S. Army and entered active duty in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 31 January 1966. The evidence of record shows the applicant served overseas in USARPAC (Thailand) from 6 July 1966 through 20 June 1967 and that this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018138

    Original file (20140018138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 May 1966 to 24 April 1968. Aside from the entry on his DD Form 214 pertaining to him being an overseas returnee from USARPAC, there is no evidence in his service records and he did not provide any substantiating evidence that shows he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005907

    Original file (20090005907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Korea from on or about 25 August 1973 to on or about 2 December 1973. Therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528

    Original file (20120006528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000523

    Original file (20130000523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, correction of his records to indicate he is alive and not deceased and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect his service during the Vietnam War. He requests the Army record be corrected to show he is alive and reflect his service during the Vietnam War. There is no evidence in his service records and he did not provide any substantiating evidence, that shows he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003964

    Original file (20070003964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows in Block 22 (Statement of Service) subparagraph c (Foreign And/Or Sea Service) "1 year, 0 months, 0 days" and it does not list the last overseas theater in which he performed his service. The applicant's record shows conclusively that he served for 1 year in Thailand with USASTRACOM in the United States Army, Pacific Command theater of operations. The applicant's record contained Special Orders awarding him the Expert Marksmanship Badge with Rifle on 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003957

    Original file (20090003957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), reviewed on 2 June 1970 and audited 30 October 1973; Headquarters, U.S. Army Support Element, Military Region 1 (Vietnam), General Orders Number 148, dated 4 July 1972; DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 26 October 1969; and DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 17 May 1974. The...