Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018138
Original file (20140018138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 11 June 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018138 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states his service in Vietnam with the 320th Artillery, 82nd Airborne Division, is not listed on his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides: 

* DD Form 47 (Induction Record)
* 3AA Form (Acknowledgement of Service Obligation)
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* DD Form 214 
* Discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)
* Immunization Record 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 May 1966 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 13A (Field Artillery Basic).  

3.  His DA Form 20 shows following completion of MOS training at Fort Sill, OK. He was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA, where he completed the Basic Airborne Course in early October 1966.   Following completion of airborne school, he was assigned to B Battery, 1st Battalion, 319th Artillery, Fort Bragg, NC, on or around 14 October 1966.

4.  Special Orders Number 239, issued by Headquarters, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg on 28 September 1967, advanced him to specialist four/E-4. 

5.  Special Orders Number 85, issued by Headquarters, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg on 22 April 1968, ordered his separation from active duty effective 24 April 1968.  The orders listed Fort Bragg as his last permanent duty station. 

6.  On 24 April 1968, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligations.  His DD Form 214 shows in: 

* Item 11c (Reason and Authority), in part "Overseas Returnee"
* Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command), 82nd Replacement Company
* Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), the entry "U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)" and 2 months of foreign service
* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) no Vietnam-specific awards 

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It stated that item 22f shows the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater service was performed, e.g., USAREUR (U.S. Army Europe).  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 May 1966 to 24 April 1968.  Following completion of MOS training and airborne training, he was assigned to Fort Bragg, NC where he remained until his separation in April 1968.  

2.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 months of foreign service in USARPAC and he was separated as an overseas returnee.  However, it is unclear whether he served in Thailand, Korea, Vietnam, or Hawaii for those 2 months.  Nothing in his service record places him in Vietnam 

3.  Aside from the entry on his DD Form 214 pertaining to him being an overseas returnee from USARPAC, there is no evidence in his service records and he did not provide any substantiating evidence that shows he served in Vietnam.  In the absence of permanent change of station or temporary duty (TDY) orders or other official documents, such as TDY settlement vouchers or leave and earnings statements showing receipt of hazardous duty pay, confirming his service in Vietnam and the exact dates of such service, regretfully, there is insufficient evidence upon which to grant the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018138



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018138



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024362

    Original file (20110024362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he has documents to substantiate/support the fact he was stationed in the Dominican Republic. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 505th Infantry Regiment, Fort Bragg, NC, from 25 May 1964 through 27 December 1965. The evidence of record confirms the 1st Battalion, 505th Infantry Regiment, served in the Dominican Republic from on or about 30 April 1965 through on or about 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003016

    Original file (20110003016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) he served in USARPAC for 2 months and 20 days * item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Parachute Badge * item 30 (Remarks) no entry documenting his service in Vietnam 8. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027114

    Original file (20100027114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. The article said this was his second tour of duty in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows he was on TCS orders to deploy with his unit on 14 February 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020186

    Original file (20100020186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his service in Vietnam with the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, the unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, for service from 6 to 23 November 1967 based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 5, dated 1979; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019245

    Original file (20110019245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. c. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) at the time of the applicant's separation processing, based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal at this time. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004899

    Original file (20140004899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his service in Zaire is not recorded on his DD Form 214. His DD Form 214 lists in: * Item 1 (Last Name - First Name – Middle Name) - his middle name as "Daniel" * Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) – a credit of 7 months and the entry, "USARPAC (U.S. Army Pacific Command)" 6. By regulation, there is no provision for listing TDY status on the DD Form 214. c. The evidence shows he served in Vietnam from 28 February 1968 through 16 September 1968, a period of 7 months,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013217

    Original file (20060013217.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Fields Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests his record be corrected to show he served in Vietnam. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows: a. he entered the Army and took BCT at Fort Bliss, TX; b. he took Advanced Individual Training (AIT) at Fort Sill, OK, but did not graduate; c. he was transferred to Fort Bragg as a duty Soldier and was assigned to Headquarters...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023996

    Original file (20100023996.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008732C071029

    Original file (20060008732C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also includes orders confirming he was awarded the BSM and ARCOM for meritorious service while serving on active duty. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged errors now under consideration on 31 December 1968; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 30 December 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010152

    Original file (20100010152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his SSN and grade are incorrect and his service in Vietnam is not listed on his DD Form 214. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct SSN, correct rank/grade, and his service in Vietnam to include his awards. With respect to his Vietnam service, the evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 4 February 1968 to 9 January 1969.