RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00170 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Southeast Asian, Japan and Samoa. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His temporary duties (TDYs) to Southeast Asia, Japan and Samoa are not listed in his records. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 7 Feb 66, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the Regular Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of the applicant’s military personnel records and documents provided did not substantiate he had foreign service credit in any other location than Hawaii. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID notes the applicant was assigned to the 76th Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Squadron (ARRS), Hickam AFB, Hawaii from 13 Aug 66 to 5 Dec 69. The 76th ARRS was awarded the Navy Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period 1 Jul 67 to 26 Jul 69 and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) for the period 1 Jul 66 to 31 May 68. The applicant’s entitlement to the Navy MUC and AFOUA was verified and his records were administratively corrected to reflect these awards. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He wants his Air Form 7, Airman Military Record, corrected to reflect his foreign service TDYs. A complete copy of the applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record, we found insufficient evidence to conclude that he has been the victim of an error or injustice with respect to his foreign service. While he has provided two supporting statements from former colleagues indicating that his former squadron frequently supported missions in Vietnam, Thailand, and Japan, these statements, in and of themselves, are not sufficient for us to conclude that he served in any of the noted locations. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00170 in Executive Session on 31 Oct 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Dec 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 8 Feb 13. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 26 Mar 13. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Apr 13. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 17 Apr 13. Panel Chair