| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. Eric N. Andersen | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to add the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and any other awards for serving in El Salvador from around June to November 1984. He also requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
3. The applicant makes no additional statement. He provides his DD Form 214 as supporting evidence.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 October 1983. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 67N (Utility Helicopter Repairer). He was promoted to Specialist Four, E-4 on 1 July 1985.
5. Neither the applicant's DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record Part I) nor his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record Part II) nor his Military Personnel Records Jacket shows that he served overseas.
6. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) indicate the applicant drew foreign duty pay from 21 May through 17 June 1984. It cannot be determined where he was stationed when he drew this pay. DFAS verified that hostile fire pay was authorized for service in El Salvador in 1984 but there was no record that the applicant drew hostile fire pay during that time.
7. On 26 October 1986, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing 3 years of creditable active service with no lost time. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle bar, and the Aircraft Crewman Badge.
8. There is no record of any disciplinary action ever being taken against the applicant. There is no evidence to show he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the AFEM is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have participated in operations or in direct support of operations for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days.
10. U. S. Total Army Personnel Command message 191510Z March 1996 authorized award of the AFEM for service in El Salvador. The period authorized for award of the AFEM was from 1 January 1981 to 1 February 1992. Qualifying service in accordance with this message specified that a soldier must be bona fide members of a unit engaged in the operation or meet one or more of the following criteria: 1) Be engaged in direct support for 30 consecutive days in the area of operations; 2) Be engaged in actual combat, or duty which is equally hazardous as combat, during the operation with armed opposition regardless of time in the area; or 3) Participate as a regularly assigned crew member of an aircraft flying into, out of, or over the area in support of the military operation.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is normally 3 years. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Only one service medal, the AFEM, is authorized for service in El Salvador.
2. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant served in El Salvador. Although DFAS records contain information to show he drew foreign duty pay during a portion of the time he contends he was in El Salvador, those records do not indicate where he was stationed when he drew that pay. DFAS confirmed that hostile fire pay was authorized for service in El Salvador during the period the applicant contends he was there; however, their records do not indicate that he drew hostile fire pay.
3. The Board concludes that there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant served in El Salvador during a period of service qualifying for award of the AFEM and it would therefore be inappropriate to add the AFEM to his DD Form 214.
4. The Board notes that the applicant's 3 years active duty qualified for consideration for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The Board notes that the available records do not indicate that he ever received any disciplinary actions or that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, the Board concludes that he met the eligibility criteria for award of this medal.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the applicant be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 27 October 1983 through 26 October 1986 and that his DD Form 214 be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal.
2. That so much of the application as pertains to award of the AFEM be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__fne__ __mvt__ __ena__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Fred N. Eichorn____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003087321 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030715 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Schneider |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0072 |
| 2. | 107.0056 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002285C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and to show that he served in El Salvador. The applicant requests that his DD Form be corrected to show the award of the CIB, OSR and to show that he served a tour in El Salvador. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010186
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA), and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) * an entry in item 18 (Remarks) documenting his service in Honduras and El Salvador 2. His final DD Form 214 shows no foreign service in item 12f; however, he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069402C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the record nor has the applicant provided any evidence to show that he served in El Salvador.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080064C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013536
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his overseas service, specifically the overseas service bar and Overseas Service Ribbon. b. letter, dated 19 March 1985, issued by the Ambassador, Embassy of the United States, El Salvador, wherein he recognized the performance of selected personnel of the 1st Aviation Battalion, including the applicant, for their aviation support to the U.S. Embassy from 3 November 1984 to 1...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089091C070403
He had served 25 years, 3 months and 16 days of total active service and his awards included the VSM and two awards of the AFEM. A review of the available records shows that the applicant was awarded the VSM for service in Thailand from 8 April 1971 through 17 September 1974. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004262
He states the Record of Proceedings for the previous consideration of his request cites Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), Table 2-2, and states El Salvador is not listed for award of the AFEM. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110012687 on 17 January 2012. The evidence of record shows the Record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025241
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's request to correct his record to show award of the AFEM, HSM, CAB, and OSB has been carefully considered. The evidence of record confirms none of the awards in question were authorized for service in El Salvador during the applicant's period of assignment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002525
The applicant maintains that he was deployed to El Salvador to train El Salvadorans and, as such, he qualifies for award of the AFEM and CIB. There is no evidence in the available records and he has not provided any evidence that shows he served in El Salvador during the qualifying period for award of the AFEM and CIB. In the absence of evidence to substantiate his service in El Salvador, there is an insufficient basis to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059308C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: The Board concludes that the AFEM award certificate, corroborated by evidence from DFAS, is sufficient to show the applicant is entitled to award of the AFEM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the AFEM and the ARCOM.