Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002285C070205
Original file (20060002285C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        26 September 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060002285


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Dean L. Turnbull              |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Marla J. N. Troup             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Chester A. Damian             |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Edward E. Montgomery          |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the
Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and to show that he served in El Salvador.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that there is no entry to show that he
served in El Salvador.  He states that he was sent the CIB and the Overseas
Service Ribbon (OSR).  He further stated that he was denied Combat Related
Special Compensation (CRSC) because there were no mention of his tour in El
Salvador and the award of the CIB was not recorded on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

     a.  a copy of his DD Form 214;

     b.  a copy of his temporary duty orders that assigned him to El
Salvador;

     c.  a copy of Message Number 181623Z APR 88 (Deployment Instruction
for predeployment country visit); and

     d.  a copy of DD Form 1610 (Request and Authorization for TDY Travel
of DOD Personnel).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 30 November 1990, the date he retired from active duty.
The application submitted in this case is dated 1 January 2006; however, it
was received on 15 February 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.




3.  DA Form 2166-7 (NCO Evaluation Report) shows that the applicant, a
Regular Army Master Sergeant, served with the U.S. Army Military Group-El
Salvador (USMILGP-El Salvador) as a Operations and Intelligence Advisor
during the period 30 October 1988 to 18 April 1989.  In this document, it
shows that the applicant provided tactical and technical advice to combat
units engaged in intense counterinsurgency operations, and engaged in a
hostile and combat environment which resulted in two enemy attacks being
repelled.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 30
November 1990, and was placed on the retired list 1 December 1990.

4.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows that
he served as an 18Z (Special Operations Senior Sergeant) for a period of 2
years and 3 months, and as a 18B (Special Operations Weapons Sergeant) for
a period of 5 years and 5 months.  He also served as an 11B (Infantryman)
for a period of 10 years and 2 months.

5.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons
Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the applicant
was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal,
Army Good Conduct Medal-6, Army Service Ribbon, Noncommissioned Officer
Professional Development Ribbon-3, Basic Recruiter Badge with three Gold
Achievement Stars, Gold Recruiter Badge, Master Parachutist Badge,
Pathfinder Badge, Special Forces Tab, Driver Badge with Bar, and the
Meritorious Service Medal.  However, it does not show he was awarded the
CIB or the OSR.

6.  There are no orders in the applicant's records to show the CIB or the
OSR.

7.  Item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 do not show that the
he served in with USMILGP-EL Salvador.

8.  MILPER Message Number 98-095 (Award of the Combat Infantryman badge and
Combat Medical badge, El Salvador), provides, in pertinent part, that the
Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to Special Forces Officer (SSI 11 or
18) in the grade of colonel or below, or an Army enlisted and warrant
officer persons who have an infantry or special forces military
occupational specialty (MOS) who, subsequent to 6 December 1941, has
satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached to an infantry,
ranger or special forces  unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size
during any period such unit was engaged in




active ground combat.  Special provision-El Salvador for the period 1
January 1981 to 1 February 1992.  A member of USMILGP-El Salvador assigned
as an advisor to a military region or zone of Armed Forces of El Salvador
(ESAF), or while serving with an infantry unit, or specialized infantry-
type or irregular-type combat unit of brigade or smaller size of ESAF, and
who was personally present and under hostile fire while assigned as
specified.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Overseas
Service Ribbon was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April
1981.  The regulation states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 August
1981, all members of
the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve
status are eligible for the award for successful completion of overseas
tours.  The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were
credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981
provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981 and the
overseas service is not recognized with another U.S. service medal.
Numerals are used to denote the second and subsequent awards of the
Overseas Service Ribbon.  For service in El Salvador, 12 months was
required to be awarded the Overseas Service Ribbon.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), at the time of the
applicant separation, states, in pertinent part, that item 18 of the DD
Form 214 do not require an entry for serving overseas while on active duty.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 in effect today states, in pertinent part,
that Soldiers on active duty deployed to a foreign country with his or her
unit during their continuous period of active service enter in the remarks
section of the DD Form 214 the appropriate entry "Service in (Name of the
country deployed) From (inclusive dates YYYYMMDD  - YYYYMMDD)."

12.  The applicant's record indicates entitlement to additional awards and
decorations not shown on his DD Form 214.

13.  MILPER Message Number 96-104 (Award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary
Medal for El Salvador) designates the country of El Salvador, beginning 1
January 1981 to 1 February 1992, as an area and a period of time in which
members of the U.S. Army Forces participated in operations in significant
numbers and otherwise met the general requirements for award of the Armed
Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).  Qualifications for this award includes
the requirement to be a bona fide member of a unit engaged in the
operation, or to serve in the area of operations for 30 days, or to be
engaged in direct support of


the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this
support involves entering the area of operations, and to be engaged in
actual combat, or duty which is equally as hazardous as combat, during the
operation with armed opposition, regardless of time in the area.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form be corrected to show the award
of the CIB, OSR and to show that he served a tour in El Salvador.

2.  The evidence shows the applicant served as a Operations and
Intelligence Advisor in El Salvador, and was engaged in intense
counterinsurgency operations, engaged in a hostile and combat environment
which resulted in two enemy attacks being repelled.  Based on the
preponderance of evidence presented in this case and MILPER Message Number
98-095, the applicant has met the requirements for the award of the CIB.
Therefore, he is entitled to corrections of his records to show this award.

3.  The applicant's temporary duty in El Salvador was less than 12 months
and does not authorize the award of Overseas Service Ribbon.  Therefore, he
is not entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

4.  Based on MILPER Message Number 96-104, the applicant is authorized the
award of AFEM.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to
show this award.

5.  Although regulations did not provide for showing the country where the
applicant served overseas on the DD Form 214, current regulations direct an
entry be made in the Remarks section of the DD Form 214.  Therefore, as an
exception to policy in this case only, in the interest of justice, it would
be appropriate to include the entry, "Service in El Salvador from 19881030
 
(30 October 1988) to 19890418 (18 April 1989)" in Item 18 of the
applicant's DD Form 214.

6.  Because the applicant was denied CRSC does not justify approval of any
portion of his request.

7.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 30 November 1990; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
29 November 1993.  The applicant did not file within the ABCMR’s statute of
limitations; however, based on available evidence, it would be in the
interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

___mjnt_  ____eem_  ____cad__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

      a.  showing the award Combat Infantryman Badge, and Armed Forces
Expeditionary Medal, and

      b.  add the entry "Service in El Salvador from 19881030 (30 October
1988) to 19890418 (18 April 1989)" in Item 18 of the applicant's DD Form
214 for the period ending 30 November 1990.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
the Overseas Service Ribbon.




                            ______Marla J. N. Troup_____________
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060002285                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060926                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |PARTIAL GRANT                           |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003267

    Original file (20080003267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for service in El Salvador. The applicant's contention that his military records should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for service in El Salvador was carefully considered and determined to be without merit. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS of 11B (Infantryman).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069402C070402

    Original file (2002069402C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the record nor has the applicant provided any evidence to show that he served in El Salvador.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007074

    Original file (20100007074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 215 dated 16 March 1999 added the AFEM (El Salvador). The applicant's request for correction of his record to show two awards of the JMUA is supported by the evidence. The evidence of record shows two DD Forms 215 have been issued correcting his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013959C071029

    Original file (20060013959C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. In addition, the regulation stipulates that eligibility for the CIB for SF personnel in MOSs 18B, 18E, 18F, and 18Z accrues from 20 December 1989, and retroactive award of the CIB to SF personnel is not authorized prior to 20 December 1989. The Board determined that the evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013536

    Original file (20110013536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his overseas service, specifically the overseas service bar and Overseas Service Ribbon. b. letter, dated 19 March 1985, issued by the Ambassador, Embassy of the United States, El Salvador, wherein he recognized the performance of selected personnel of the 1st Aviation Battalion, including the applicant, for their aviation support to the U.S. Embassy from 3 November 1984 to 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008909

    Original file (20090008909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records also do not show that he was awarded the Humanitarian Service Medal. Although the applicant served in El Salvador during the entire period of the El Salvador Earthquake Disaster Relief Operation from 10 to 20 October 1986, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records which shows that he directly participated in that relief operation and the applicant failed to provide any evidence that he directly participated in this relief operation. As only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009580

    Original file (20070009580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was one of several officers from the 470th Military Intelligence (MI) Brigade which was based in Panama who participated in the operation. The applicant indicated by email that he was awarded the first award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his participation in Operation Just Cause, in Panama, from 20 December 1989 to 31 January 1990. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a period of qualifying service for the second award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087321C070212

    Original file (2003087321C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant served in El Salvador. The Board concludes that there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant served in El Salvador during a period of service qualifying for award of the AFEM and it would therefore be inappropriate to add the AFEM to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002525

    Original file (20110002525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant maintains that he was deployed to El Salvador to train El Salvadorans and, as such, he qualifies for award of the AFEM and CIB. There is no evidence in the available records and he has not provided any evidence that shows he served in El Salvador during the qualifying period for award of the AFEM and CIB. In the absence of evidence to substantiate his service in El Salvador, there is an insufficient basis to grant his request.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050005885

    Original file (20050005885.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The designated military operations and dates of eligibility for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal are specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22. The evidence shows that the applicant served in Panama throughout the period of his overseas service. The evidence does not support the applicant's contention that he is entitled to award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal based on his overseas service at a time there was foreign conflict or action.