| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. Eric N. Andersen | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that while engaged in small arms fire with the enemy in Vietnam, metal from a bullet went into his right eye.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the Proceedings prepared to reflect the consideration of Docket Number AR2002069749 by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 1 October 2002.
The applicant submits a Consultation Report, dated 21 November 2002, from an ophthalmologist which shows the applicant reported a history of a service related injury in May 1969 resulting in bullet fragments embedded in his right cornea. The report also states that the applicant's right cornea contains multiple retained metallic foreign bodies.
The applicant also submits digital photographs of his eyes.
The Consultation Report and photographs are new evidence and will be considered by the Board.
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
The applicant's separation medical examination makes no mention of any injuries or wounds sustained to his right eye as a result of hostile action.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board reviewed the Consultation Report and the digital photographs provided in support of the applicant's claim for award of the Purple Heart. However, there is no evidence that the metallic foreign bodies in the applicant's right cornea are the result of hostile action in Vietnam.
2. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
3. After review of all the evidence in this case and the latest submissions this Board concluded the applicant has presented no argument or evidence which is sufficient to reverse the previous decision rendered by the ABCMR in AR2002069749 on 1 October 2002.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
FNE____ MVT_____ ENA_____ DENY APPLICATION
Carl W. S. Chun
| CASE ID | AR2003084856 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | Yes |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030715 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014952
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070014952 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting reconsideration of his request for the Purple Heart because his medical record did not show that he was treated for a wound during his tour in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant provides a medical record, dated 7 June 1969 in support of this application.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009210
The applicant states, in effect, that he has provided military medical records that show he was wounded as a result of enemy action. The applicant provided a copy of his SF 600 and SF 93 which are considered new evidence and merit consideration by the Board. In the absence of such evidence that clearly states he was injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005920
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments) assignments in the 25th Infantry Division and the 720th Military Police Battalion between 13 September 1970 and 29 August 1971 when he returned to the United States for separation and transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve as a specialist four (pay grade E-4); b. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Bronze Star Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017557
b. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 27 June 1967, shows he sustained a perforating wound to the cornea of his right eye when he was struck in the eye by a piece of bamboo at the 90th Replacement Battalion, Long Binh, Vietnam. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was clearing vegetation around a perimeter in Vietnam when he sustained an eye...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011760
The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) that he be awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's new argument, as stated in his request, is that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in 1967, in Phu Bai, Vietnam, during a mortar attack. However, there is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he sustained a wound in 1967, in Vietnam, during a mortar...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070472C070402
Although there is no direct medical evidence to show that the applicant received medical treatment for the claimed wounds, the physician from his October 1991 flight physical indicated that the applicant had a history of corneal abrasion. This would not be inconsistent with Warrant Officer D___’s description of the applicant’s wounds.The Board concludes that any reasonable doubt concerning the applicant’s eligibility for award of the Purple Heart should be resolved in his favor. That all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006715
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Regrettably, the Standard Forms 513 and VA rating decision are insufficient evidence to support award of the PH in this case. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002046
Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam. A review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain any documents that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017178
Specifically, he requests: * award of the Purple Heart for wounds received during his service in the Republic of Vietnam * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart * correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5, vice specialist four (SP4)/E-4 2. The applicant states: * in March 1970, he was setting up Landing Zone (LZ) Caroline when the unit came...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025136
A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. Both the applicant and his former platoon sergeant state metal from a bullet ricocheted into the applicant's left jaw. In view of all of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's claim to the Purple Heart.