IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 28 August 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002046
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he was wounded in combat and was never awarded a Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides:
* Self-authored statement, dated 1 July 2011
* Friend's statement, dated 26 April 2011
* Clark County Veterans' Service Officer Transmittal Form, dated 15 January 2014
* Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 11 July 1966
* Doctor's Progress notes, dated 15 July 1966 and 10 October 1966
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame
provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted,
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 October 1964. He completed training as an infantry direct fire crewman. He arrived in Vietnam on 4 January 1966.
3. On 14 August 1966, the applicant departed Vietnam en-route to the United States. He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 13 October 1967. He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).
4. The Purple Heart is not listed on the applicant's DD Form 214.
5. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam.
6. A review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain any documents that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces.
7. Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.
8. The applicant provides a self-authored statement contending that he was in Vietnam unloading supply choppers when the unit to which he was assigned began receiving incoming fire. During one of his trips to the chopper a mortar round or rocket hit very close to the unit and he suddenly felt pain in his eye. He was evacuated to the field hospital at Pleiku and the doctor attempted to get a piece of metal out of his eye with different instruments, but he could not. After about a week the metal came out on its own. Nothing was ever said about the Purple Heart and he never asked about it.
9. The applicant also provides a statement from his friend contending that the applicant received an eye injury as he states. He provides a Chronological Record of Medical Care and Doctor's Progress Notes showing that he had a foreign body in his eye which finally disappeared.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
11. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), chapter 9, in effective at the time, provided for the preparation and submission of the DA Form 20. Paragraph 9-53 states that item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 shows the wounds and reflects a brief description of wounds or injuries requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization and the date wounded or injured.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions have been noted. His supporting evidence has been considered. However, the statements and medical documents provided by the applicant are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. There is no evidence contained in his OMPF showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam. There is no entry made on his DA Form 20, and his name is not shows on The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ___x____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________x______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002046
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002046
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005886
He thinks his captain made an error in not awarding him the Purple Heart [while he was serving in Vietnam]. Although the applicant may have received stitches to his head while he was serving in Vietnam, the evidence of record does not show and he has not provided any evidence that shows these stitches were the result of a wound that was incurred as a result of enemy action. In the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017557
b. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 27 June 1967, shows he sustained a perforating wound to the cornea of his right eye when he was struck in the eye by a piece of bamboo at the 90th Replacement Battalion, Long Binh, Vietnam. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was clearing vegetation around a perimeter in Vietnam when he sustained an eye...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014187
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007484
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military records contain no medical records showing he was wounded in action or treated for a wound received as a result of enemy action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014356
His complete service medical record is not available to the Board for review. the SF 88 shows the entry "Fragment in eye, mortar explosion, S. Vietnam, 1968." The available documentation shows the applicant had a fragment in his eye.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018986
He is blind in his left eye from an injury he received in 1967 while serving in Vietnam with Battery C, 77th Artillery, 4th Infantry Division. There is no evidence in the applicants records and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for such wounds by medical personnel, and that his treatment was made a matter of official record. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of official orders or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015994
There is no documentary evidence that shows the applicant was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His medical records, which would have listed any injuries and treatment, are not available for review with this case. The applicant's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of combat.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000432
He states the applicant received a combat-related wound to his right armpit while responding to an enemy attempt to penetrate the perimeter of LZ Two Bits during the hours of darkness. The applicant and his former commanding officer describe the applicant's injury as having occurred when he was taking cover during a firefight. In the absence of official documentation showing he was injured as a result of hostile action (other than by accident), that the injury required treatment by medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029997
The applicant states he was wounded in April 1966 in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant's service medical records are not available for review. The applicant requests to be awarded the Purple Heart because he was wounded in combat in the RVN in April 1966.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017187
The applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam Casualty Roster and his records do not contain general orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. However, there is no indication in the submitted statement that the author witnessed the injury at the time it happened or was present at the time the applicant was treated for his injury. Therefore, without the source document, the endorsement itself is insufficient evidence upon which to award the applicant the Purple Heart.