Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025136
Original file (20100025136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025136 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was on a combat operation in mid-April 1969 with the 2nd Platoon, Company C, 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division, in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) when his unit came under attack from the Viet Cong.

	a.  They were pinned down in an open rice paddy.  A bullet from the enemy struck the rifle of the Soldier next to him, which caused a piece of metal to ricochet into his left jaw.

	b.  The medic treated him, but he did not put the applicant in for award of the Purple Heart.

	c.  He adds he still has a small amount of metal in his left jaw that causes him pain.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and two letters.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for a period of 24 months on 22 May 1968.  Upon completion of training he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) that he served in the RVN from 7 November 1968 through 30 July 1969;

	b.  item 40 (Wounds) is blank; and

	c.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list the Purple Heart.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 17 May 1970 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation.

	a.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 26 days of net active service.

	b.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show the Purple Heart.

5.  A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart.

6.  A review of the Vietnam casualty roster revealed the applicant's name is not on the roster.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam-era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders pertaining to award of the Purple Heart to the applicant.

8.  In support of his application, the applicant provides:

	a.  a letter from Mr. H. D. S____, dated 27 August 2010.  He states he was the applicant's platoon sergeant in mid-April 1969 when the platoon came under attack and was pinned down in an open rice paddy.  A bullet fired by the enemy struck the rifle of the Soldier next to the applicant causing a piece of metal to ricochet into the applicant's left jaw.  He states the applicant was treated for his wound by "Doc S____" and should have been awarded the Purple Heart; and

	b.  a letter under the signature of M. D. R____, M.D., Gainesville, VA, dated 15 January 2008.  The applicant was seen for pain and x-rays showed his paranasal sinuses were clear.  The letter also contains a handwritten note that indicates, "Films reviewed (4 views).  Addendum:  Multiple shrapnel embedded in left jaw and soft tissue."  The note was signed by N____ A____, M.D., Fellow of the American College of Physicians, on 24 September 2010.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.  The Purple Heart is awarded to any member who was wounded or killed in action.  A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.  In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by medical personnel and the medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart because he was injured while serving in the RVN.

2.  The applicant's claim was carefully considered.

	a.  The statement by the applicant's former platoon sergeant indicates he was aware the applicant was injured and that he received treatment at the time of the incident in question.  However, the former platoon sergeant offers no explanation as to why he did not take action to ensure the applicant (a member of his platoon) was awarded the Purple Heart.

	b.  Both the applicant and his former platoon sergeant state metal from a bullet ricocheted into the applicant's left jaw.  The handwritten note from the applicant's doctor indicates the applicant has "multiple shrapnel embedded in left jaw and soft tissue."

	c.  Neither the applicant nor his former platoon sergeant is certain as to the date of the incident.

3.  The sincerity of the applicant's claim is not in question.  However, in order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made was sustained in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment for the wound or injury must have been made a matter of official record.

4.  There is no record of medical treatment to satisfy the strict requirement for award of the Purple Heart.  In addition, the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster and there is no evidence the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.

5.  In view of all of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's claim to the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025136



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025136



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020444

    Original file (20090020444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for such wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021384

    Original file (20140021384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart for a wound received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). He told the medic about his right knee. The applicant states that at the time he was not sure how he sustained the injury to his right knee, but thought he might have hit his knee on a rock.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016509

    Original file (20130016509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016509 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. h. Another thing that kind of bugs him is that he was told by his lieutenant right before he had lost his eye that the major of his battalion had put him in for the Silver Star for what he saw him do when they were sweeping the village. He does not indicate what, if any, record of such treatment was ever made.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016522

    Original file (20070016522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The case was considered by the Board as AR2003093948. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as the result of hostile action on 19 October 1967 and by showing that is authorized to wear four bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011532

    Original file (20080011532.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division General Orders Number 6435, dated 6 August 1968, show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device for action on 2 July 1968. There are no medical records in the applicant’s military personnel file to show he sustained wounds as a result of hostile action or to show he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017887

    Original file (20090017887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Standard Form 504 (Clinical Record - History) shows the applicant was injured on 2 March 1970 and received initial medical treatment at the 67th Evacuation Hospital. Within 2 days, military medical personnel annotated the applicant's medical chart to show he received his gunshot wound by an accidental shot from an M-16 rifle. Therefore, in the absence of military and medical records showing the applicant's injury resulted from enemy forces, there is insufficient evidence upon which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021176

    Original file (20130021176.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Because he was not evacuated, no record was made of his wound or treatment, and he did not receive the Purple Heart. No record was made of his wound or treatment, and he did not receive a Purple Heart. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart or for correction of his service medical records to show the "source, fact and treatment" of an injury he received in 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084856C070212

    Original file (2003084856C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the Proceedings prepared to reflect the consideration of Docket Number AR2002069749 by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 1 October 2002. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014474

    Original file (20100014474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains no entry, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, and there are no general orders in his records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available medical records show: a. In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not document any combat wounds, his record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, and...