Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Ms. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | ||
Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that his injuries were taken care of at the field aid station. He was returned to duty after the glass was removed from his eyes and mouth. He provides his Report of Separation from Active Duty, DD Form 214, for the period ending 25 March 1974, General Orders 1668 awarding him the Air Medal for heroism, and a letter from his co-pilot as supporting evidence.
4. The applicant’s military records show that, after having had prior service, he entered active duty as an aviator warrant officer on 7 September 1971. He served in Vietnam from on or about October 1971 to on or about October 1972.
5. The applicant and Warrant Officer D___ were awarded the Air Medal with “V” device on General Orders 1668, Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade dated 7 June 1972 for action on 28 April 1972. The citation states that their aircraft came under heavy hostile ground to air fire. The engine was shot out but they were able to autorotate to the ground.
6. Warrant Officer D___ (now Chief Warrant Officer Four, retired) provided an expanded description of the 28 April 1972 incident. He states that the applicant was wounded by shrapnel and glass in the face and eyes when enemy bullets struck their helicopter from underneath and destroyed their instrument panel and windscreen. After they were rescued, the medical officer removed the glass slivers and small metal splinters from the applicant’s eyes.
7. The applicant was released from active duty on 25 March 1974. On 2 November 1975, he re-entered active duty as an aviator warrant officer. On his Report of Medical History, SF 93, dated 17 October 1991 for a flight physical, the applicant noted that he received glass fragments in both eyes in 1972. Item 25, the physician’s summary, indicated the applicant had a history of corneal abrasion with no sequalae. He retired on 1 August 1992.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The statements of individuals are normally inadequate as the sole basis for an award of the Purple Heart because they do not fulfill the regulatory requirement that there be a record of medical treatment. However, in this case, the supporting statement from the applicant’s co-pilot is to some extent supported by evidence of record to substantiate that the applicant did in fact receive the wounds claimed and was treated by competent medical personnel. The award citation itself indicates the helicopter’s engine was shot out, making further damage to the helicopter, such as a destroyed instrument panel and windscreen, reasonably presumptuous. Such damage leads to the reasonable presumption that an occupant of the helicopter, in this case the applicant, would have received wounds from flying glass from the shattered windscreen and metal splinters from the destroyed instrument panel.
2. Although there is no direct medical evidence to show that the applicant received medical treatment for the claimed wounds, the physician from his October 1991 flight physical indicated that the applicant had a history of corneal abrasion. This would not be inconsistent with Warrant Officer D___’s description of the applicant’s wounds. The Board concludes that any reasonable doubt concerning the applicant’s eligibility for award of the Purple Heart should be resolved in his favor.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received on 28 April 1972.
2. That the Purple Heart be added to the applicant’s DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 25 March 1974 and 31 July 1992.
BOARD VOTE:
__RVO__ __RWA__ __JTM__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Raymond V. O’Connor___
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2002070472 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/20 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010025
The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show that she was wounded in action and awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that her records should be corrected to show she was wounded in action and awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 17 November 2004.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013923
There is no evidence in the available records and he has not provided evidence that shows his injuries were the result of hostile action. Regrettably, in the absence of military records which show he was injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019081
The applicant's record contains numerous documents that show he was involved in an aviation accident on 10 February 1969, in which the CH-47 Chinook helicopter he co-piloted crashed while he and fellow crewmembers were conducting resupply operations at Firebase Erskine. Documentation and witnesses indicate enemy ground fire caused the crash of the CH-47 Chinook helicopter on 10 February 1969, which wounded the entire crew and killed 3 Marines. The evidence of record does not support the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100623C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a photograph showing a man with a patch over his left eye, statements from several individuals, a 1997 “Compensation and Pension Examination Request Worksheet,” and his 2003 Department of Veterans Affairs rating decision. Three of the four statements, submitted by the applicant in support of his request, were authored in 1995 and the fourth statement was authored in 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04104585C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 04 JANUARY 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004104585 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. His record should be corrected accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001131
A review of his personnel service records failed to show evidence and he did not provide any evidence showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's records contain orders awarding him the Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star Medal, and Air Medal (2nd through 26th Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Deleting the Air Medal and Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016118
She also indicates that search and rescue did not indicate weather as being a factor in the search effort started within 2 hours of the crash and that the investigating authority properly declared the cause of the crash as "unknown" and without evidence of hostile fire postulated pilot error as a likely cause since mechanical malfunctions and radio problems could be reasonably eliminated and evidence of hostile fire existed. The applicant provides a letter, dated 10 April 2003, from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021543
At the time, the company commander handed him a Purple Heart medal, but told him the paperwork would have to catch up with him because it would have to come through the medical facilities at Cu Chi. There is no evidence in his service personnel record showing he was wounded during his period of service in Vietnam. c. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007658
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states he should be awarded the PH, because near Qui Nhon he drove over a mine and injured his left eye and left knee, but he was not awarded the PH. In the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis upon which to base award of the PH in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004386
The human remains recovered from the crash site were so limited they precluded any determination of the cause of death and the 10 April 2009 Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command J-2 Report does not address the cause of the crash. The only evidence to document the cause of the crash is the statement from Mr. Vek that he shot down the aircraft. His statement is supported by his military award for shooting down a helicopter in the location of and at the time the FSM's aircraft went missing.