Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009210
Original file (20090009210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  3 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009210 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he has provided military medical records that show he was wounded as a result of enemy action.  The medical records verify that he received an eye injury from a fragment.

3.  The applicant submitted a copy of a Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) and a SF 93 (Record of Medical History).  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080014779, dated 18 November 2008.

2.  The applicant provided a copy of his SF 600 and SF 93 which are considered new evidence and merit consideration by the Board.

3.  After having had 6 days service as an inductee, the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 March 1969 and he was honorably released from active duty on 13 December 1971.


4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 31 August 1970 to 13 June 1971.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded while he was assigned to the RVN.

5.  The applicant’s SF 600, dated 7 June 1971, shows he received “metal penetration in cornea MEDAVAC to 91st.”

6.  The applicant submitted a copy of an SF Form 93, dated 1 December 1971, which shows on 7 June 1971 the applicant was treated at the 91st Evacuation Hospital in the RVN for a small piece of metal that was in his left eye.  The SF 93 also shows he received an “eye injury in the RVN 7 Jun 71 fragment wound” and “head injury – young childhood-fx skull.” 

7.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.  There are also no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

8.  The Vietnam casualty roster does not list the applicant as wounded by hostile forces.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered.

2.  The SF 93 and the SF 600 that the applicant provided are not sufficient to award the applicant the Purple Heart.  Although the SF 600 shows he received medical treatment for metal in his left eye, it does not state the injury was the result of hostile action.  There is also no corroborating evidence in his service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds.  Additionally, the applicant is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  In the absence of such evidence that clearly states he was injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080014779, dated 18 November 2008.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009210



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014356

    Original file (20110014356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete service medical record is not available to the Board for review. the SF 88 shows the entry "Fragment in eye, mortar explosion, S. Vietnam, 1968." The available documentation shows the applicant had a fragment in his eye.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070472C070402

    Original file (2002070472C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although there is no direct medical evidence to show that the applicant received medical treatment for the claimed wounds, the physician from his October 1991 flight physical indicated that the applicant had a history of corneal abrasion. This would not be inconsistent with Warrant Officer D___’s description of the applicant’s wounds.The Board concludes that any reasonable doubt concerning the applicant’s eligibility for award of the Purple Heart should be resolved in his favor. That all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004967

    Original file (20140004967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his helicopter was shot down three times in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). g. On 9 October 1972, he was released from active duty. The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show he was, on 3 separate occasions, awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001087

    Original file (20120001087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 29 January 1967, 9 January 1971, and 19 November 1975 * VA application for compensation or pension * VA medical records * VA rating decision * Standard Form (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 24 July 1975 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012281

    Original file (20110012281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service): Vietnam from 2 August 1966 through 5 August 1967; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments): Company A, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Air Cavalry Division (Airmobile), from 20 August 1966 through 2 August 1967; c. item 40 (Wounds): contains no entries; and d. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no listing of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016766

    Original file (20090016766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 shows: * Item 40 (Wounds) he received a fragment wound to the posterior aspect of the right shoulder on 9 February 1971 * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the Purple Heart 7. He is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for injuries received on 9 February 1971, b. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005948

    Original file (20080005948.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It further determined there was no evidence of record that indicated the applicant had ever been awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. The Board finally concluded that absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat related wound by military medical personnel, there was insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the PH.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019041

    Original file (20110019041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show the second award of the Purple Heart for wounds he received on 10 May 1968 in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 9 September 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005760

    Original file (20140005760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His official military personnel file (OMPF) contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) covering the period 24 January 1969 to 1 December 1974 that shows in: * item 38 (Record of Assignments) – he was assigned to the 21st Aviation Company in the Republic of Vietnam from 28 January 1971 to 3 November 1971 * item 40 (Wounds) – no entries describing wounds or injuries received as a result of enemy action that required medical treatment * item 41 (awards and Decorations) – no entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019288

    Original file (20090019288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Evidence shows the applicant suffered a mortar wound to the left knee on 17 April 1967 as a result of hostile action that was treated by the appropriate medical personnel. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service...