Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069801C070402
Original file (2002069801C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 17 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002069801

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his 11 January 2002 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve, however, he did not do so within the established suspense date he was given and thus was discharged. He goes on to state that he did not do so because at the time he was experiencing a lot stress in regards to the possibility of losing his job and had to be prescribed medicine (anti-depressants) to cope with the situation. He goes on to state that the situation was eventually resolved and he submitted his election of options statement on 22 January 2002; however, he had already been discharged on 11 January 2002. After contacting officials at the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM), he was advised to apply to the Board. He further states that he understands the importance of meeting suspense dates but also realizes the importance of having experienced Reserve personnel to draw on when needed. He also states that his request is a reasonable one and one that is beneficial to all concerned. In support of his application he submits a copy of his option election form and a letter from his doctor indicating that he had been prescribed medication.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

After serving 6 years, 7 months and 5 days of active service in the Air Force, he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-5 on 25 June 1974. He enlisted in the USAR on 3 January 1976 and served in the USAR and the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) during intermittent enlistments until he was commissioned as a USAR and FLARNG second lieutenant on 23 February 1989. He was promoted to the rank of captain on 1 January 1995.

On 21 March 2001, the ARPERSCOM notified the applicant (20-year letter) that he had completed the required years of service to be eligible for Retired pay at age 60 (5 June 2008).

On 25 September 2001, the ARPERSCOM dispatched a memorandum to the applicant informing him that he had not earned the required number of retirement points during the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) date and as such was required to be discharged unless he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve or requested a one-time waiver. The applicant was provided an election statement and was given until 30 October 2001, in which to select an option.

The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 11 January 2002. He completed the option election statement requesting transfer to the Retired Reserve on 22 January 2002.

The supporting statement from the applicant’s physician indicates that he prescribed an anti-depressant for the applicant on 27 December 2001 and that the applicant voluntarily terminated its use on 18 February 2002.

Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR soldiers. Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the Reserve Components. Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. After the effective date of discharge, orders could not be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s honorable discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions regarding the stressful situation he was under at the time and notes that not only did the ARPERSCOM give him 30 days to make an election option, they delayed the discharge action an additional 2 ½ months after the established suspense date. This was more than sufficient time for him to make a simple election. Accordingly, the Board finds no basis to void a duly constituted discharge order that was properly executed.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___mvt__ ___jhl___ ___rtd___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002069801
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/10/17
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 335 135.0300/CHG STATUS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069110C070402

    Original file (2002069110C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. Because entitlement laws have changed, the applicant is now eligible for “Gray Area” benefits from a discharged status and his retired pay will not be jeopardized by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069831C070402

    Original file (2002069831C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that while he was never counseled on the differences between discharge and transfer to the Retired Reserve, he elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 30 September 1988 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009163

    Original file (20090009163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. He states that paragraph 3 of the ABCMR’s decision states that his records contain ARPERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, that erroneously show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 January 2002 and that it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074446C070403

    Original file (2002074446C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. A review of the applicant’s records shows that he was an exceptional soldier in all aspects of his military career. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 29 January 1999 discharge from the USAR pertaining to the individual concerned and by transferring him to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082034C070215

    Original file (2002082034C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the USAR Retired Reserve. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge from the USAR was unjust for the following reasons: he responded to the option letter provided him prior to the effective date of his discharge; his intent to enter the Retired Reserve was clearly established in his response to this option letter; he was not given...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078691C070215

    Original file (2002078691C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be placed in the Retired Reserve to allow for continued payment of his earned Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) benefits. The form he received contained no explanation that he would forfeit VSI benefits as a result of being discharged or that he had the option to transfer to the Retired Reserve and continue to receive annual VSI payments. That all of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072547C070403

    Original file (2002072547C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities governing the granting of retired pay to soldiers and former Reserve component soldiers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012558

    Original file (20070012558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of Defense Instruction (DoDi) Number 1200.15 (Assignment to and Transfer Between Reserve Categories, Discharge from Reserve Status, Transfer to the Retired Reserve, and Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay), paragraph 5.3.3. stipulates, in pertinent part, that Reservists who have qualified for retirement under Chapter 1223 of Title 10 U.S. Code, except for having reached 60 years of age, are required to attain 50 points annually during their anniversary year to be retained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080022C070215

    Original file (2002080022C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from his United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit on 10 June 2001, approximately 8 months after he received his 20 -year letter. While the Board cannot ascertain why the applicant was not advised or why he was discharged after his ETS, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that given his qualifying years of creditable service for retired pay purposes, had he been afforded the opportunity prior to discharge, he would have elected to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077049C070215

    Original file (2002077049C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 6 June 2002 and assigning him to the Retired...