Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080022C070215
Original file (2002080022C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 22 April 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002080022


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from his United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit on 10 June 2001, approximately 8 months after he received his 20 -year letter. He further states that when he went to his unit he was informed that his records had been sent to the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) in St. Louis, Missouri. He continues by stating that he desires to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in order that he may receive his identification (ID) card.

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 1 July 1992, he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-5, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, under the Fiscal Year 1992 Voluntary Early Transition Program with the Special Separation Bonus (SSB) entitlement. He had served 13 years of active service and received $34, 592.84 in a single SSB payment.

5. He enlisted in the USAR for a period of 3 years, was assigned to a troop program unit in Georgia and was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 November 1993. He reenlisted on 11 June 1995 for a period of 6 years. His expiration of term of service was 10 June 2001.

6. On 21 September 2000, the ARPERSCOM notified the applicant (20-year letter) that he had completed the required years of service to be eligible for Retired Pay at age 60 (24 January 2019).

7. On 7 February 2002, the 81st Regional Support Command in Birmingham, Alabama, published orders discharging the applicant from the USAR effective the same date.

8. A review of the applicant's records fails to show any indication that the applicant was notified that he was being separated or that he was advised of his options prior to discharge.

9. Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR soldiers. Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

10. Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the Reserve Components. Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. After the effective date of discharge, orders could not be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s discharge was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

2. However, it appears that he was not afforded the opportunity to be transferred to the Retired Reserve before he was discharged, which was approximately 9 months after his ETS. While the Board cannot ascertain why the applicant was not advised or why he was discharged after his ETS, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that given his qualifying years of creditable service for retired pay purposes, had he been afforded the opportunity prior to discharge, he would have elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 7 February 2002 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 7 February 2002 discharge from the USAR of the individual concerned; and by showing that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 7 February 2002.

BOARD VOTE:

__mm___ __mb___ __clg____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION


                  ____Melvin H. Meyer_____
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002080022
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/04/22
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HDDD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 189 110.0000/VOID DISCH
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069831C070402

    Original file (2002069831C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that while he was never counseled on the differences between discharge and transfer to the Retired Reserve, he elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 30 September 1988 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070079C070402

    Original file (2002070079C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 17 March 1992 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 4 January 1992, the date his Retired Identification Card was issued. RECOMMENDATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063504C070421

    Original file (2001063504C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that she instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s discharge was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct her military records by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077049C070215

    Original file (2002077049C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 6 June 2002 and assigning him to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009163

    Original file (20090009163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. He states that paragraph 3 of the ABCMR’s decision states that his records contain ARPERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, that erroneously show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 January 2002 and that it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074446C070403

    Original file (2002074446C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. A review of the applicant’s records shows that he was an exceptional soldier in all aspects of his military career. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 29 January 1999 discharge from the USAR pertaining to the individual concerned and by transferring him to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079726C070215

    Original file (2002079726C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, it appears that he was not afforded the opportunity to be transferred to the Retired Reserve because an administrative error resulted in an old address being used on his discharge orders. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 26 July 1999 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072547C070403

    Original file (2002072547C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities governing the granting of retired pay to soldiers and former Reserve component soldiers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056796C070420

    Original file (2001056796C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She further states that had she known this she would not have reenlisted for another 3 years. On 4 May 2000, the ARPERSCOM published orders discharging her from the USAR effective 10 May 2000. Therefore, the Board finds that her discharged orders should be revoked and that she be reinstated to her previous status in the USAR with credit for all drills (points only) that she earned during the appropriate retirement years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074577C070403

    Original file (2002074577C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that on 7 December 1982, she was commissioned a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) of the United States Army Reserve (USAR), and that she is currently assigned to the Retired Reserve and is receiving retired pay. By regulation, Retired Reserve members who were removed from active status are ineligible for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was selected for...