Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072547C070403
Original file (2002072547C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 15 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072547

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Member
Mr. Jose A. Martinez Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he completed 20 years of service in June 1998 and decided that because of his involvement in community service and a new job, and the fact that he was moving, it was time to allow someone else the opportunity to be the first sergeant of a unit that had such a geographical displacement, management of it’s soldiers was a time consuming endeavor. Therefore, he requested transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). He goes on to state that his unit administrator informed him that if he selected transfer to the Retired Reserve, he would not be allowed to reenter at a later date. He continues by stating that this information turns out to be incorrect and as a result, he made his decision based on incorrect information, a decision that may affect his retirement plans and bring hardship on his family.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records, though somewhat incomplete, show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 June 1978 for a period of 3 years. He served until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 5 June 1981. He was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and subsequently was transferred to a troop program unit, where he remained through a series of continuous reenlistments. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-8 on 3 October 1994.

The last evaluation report contained in his Official Military Personnel File has an ending date of June 1998 and indicates that the applicant was leaving the unit.

On 12 January 2000, the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM published order discharging the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).

Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR soldiers. Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the Reserve Components. Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. After the effective date of discharge, orders could not be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.

Due to recent Departmental changes (enclosed), certain benefits, such as commissary and post exchange privileges, accrue to Reservists with more than 20 years of qualifying service for retirement at age 60 and who have terminated their Reserve status.

Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities governing the granting of retired pay to soldiers and former Reserve component soldiers. It provides, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of application, but must have attained age 60, completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service and served the last 8 years of his or her qualifying service as a Reserve component soldier. Soldiers who have received a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter) may make application for Retired pay 6 months prior to reaching age 60.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant’s honorable discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

2. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board; however, they are not supported by the evidence submitted with his application,or the evidence of record. The applicant’s discharge orders were published in January 2000 and there is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant took steps to either extend his enlistment or to reenlist prior to his ETS.

3. The Board also notes that during the period he was assigned to the Control Group, he had the option of requesting transfer to the Active or Retired Control Group, there is no evidence that he made any such attempt. Inasmuch as he no longer had a contract and did not make his desires to remain affiliated with the USAR known, the ARPERSCOM had no option but to discharge him.

4. The applicant’s contention that he received incorrect information also appears to be without merit. A discharge from the USAR does not necessarily preclude subsequent enlistment in a Reserve Component if the individual is otherwise qualified and the needs of the service dictate.



5. Although his discharge will have no effect on his right to apply for Retired Pay at age 60 or his entitlement to benefits, his failure to elect transfer to the Retired Reserve vice discharge has allowed him to not be subject to recall since his discharge.

6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___inw___ __jm ___ __js ____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071547
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/08/15
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 2000/01/12
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR135-178
DISCHARGE REASON ETS
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 333 135.0100/TRAN RET USAR
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072783C070403

    Original file (2002072783C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be granted Reserve Retired Pay at age 60 or provided an official reason why he is not eligible to receive it. On 11 June 1999, in response to the applicant’s application for Retired Pay at age 60, the ARPERSCOM informed the applicant that in order to be eligible for USAR Retired Pay, he must have completed a minimum of 20 qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009163

    Original file (20090009163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. He states that paragraph 3 of the ABCMR’s decision states that his records contain ARPERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, that erroneously show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 January 2002 and that it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065711C070421

    Original file (2001065711C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 14 October 1998, the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) notified the applicant (20-year letter) that he had completed the required years of service to be eligible for Retired pay at age 60 (8 April 2015).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069831C070402

    Original file (2002069831C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that while he was never counseled on the differences between discharge and transfer to the Retired Reserve, he elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 30 September 1988 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075114C070403

    Original file (2002075114C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be granted service points for the time he spent in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)) and that he be placed in the Retired Reserve effective 6 December 1994, when he left the active Reserve. The applicant submitted his request for Retired Pay at age 60 on 1 May 2002. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board; however, they are not supported by the evidence submitted with his application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085778C070212

    Original file (2003085778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was not given the proper number of points for his service and has been unjustly denied his Retired Pay. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was established as an independent agency by act of June 28, 1937 (50 Statute 319).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074446C070403

    Original file (2002074446C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. A review of the applicant’s records shows that he was an exceptional soldier in all aspects of his military career. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 29 January 1999 discharge from the USAR pertaining to the individual concerned and by transferring him to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059443C070421

    Original file (2001059443C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be granted retirement benefits in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) at age 60. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he should have been granted retirement benefits at age 60; however, when he applied, he was informed that he had only served 19 Years, 4 months and 17 days of qualifying service and therefore was ineligible for Retired Pay and benefits. The requirement for a 20-year USAR retirement is to have served 20 years of qualifying service for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070079C070402

    Original file (2002070079C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 17 March 1992 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 4 January 1992, the date his Retired Identification Card was issued. RECOMMENDATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080022C070215

    Original file (2002080022C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from his United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit on 10 June 2001, approximately 8 months after he received his 20 -year letter. While the Board cannot ascertain why the applicant was not advised or why he was discharged after his ETS, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that given his qualifying years of creditable service for retired pay purposes, had he been afforded the opportunity prior to discharge, he would have elected to be...