Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009163
Original file (20090009163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied



		BOARD DATE:	  27 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009163 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), on
6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records’ (ABCMR’s) decision to deny his request leads him to believe the United States Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) erred on two separate occasions to his detriment.  He states that paragraph 3 of the ABCMR’s decision states that his records contain ARPERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, that erroneously show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 January 2002 and that it appears that ARPERSCOM was not aware that Headquarters, United States Army 94th Regional Support Command had discharged him in October 2001.  He states that paragraph 4 of the ABCMR’s decision states that he provided an ARPERSCOM letter dated February 2002, welcoming him into the IRR; however, unless he can provide evidence to show he reenlisted or otherwise extended his 17 March 1995 enlistment, it appears this letter was also prepared in error.

3.  The applicant states the above two notifications deny him benefits to which he would otherwise be entitled.  He states that he lost the opportunity to elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in 2002 because he was informed by ARPERSCOM that he was in the IRR.  He states that prior to April 2000, he was in the IRR and he went on active duty; that he asked to be transferred to the IRR upon his release from active duty on 6 May 2000; and that it is not difficult to conclude that he would have returned to the IRR upon completion of his service. 4.  However, the ABCMR has concluded that he was not transferred to the IRR.  He states that he believed that he was in the IRR, as a result of the ARPERSCOM letter, dated 25 February 2002.  Therefore, he was not afforded the opportunity to exercise his right to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.  He states the ABCMR concluded that he was honorably discharged from his 17 March 1995 enlistment in October 2001 and that he timely requested transfer to the IRR subsequent to his October 2001 discharge.  

5.  He states that there is no basis for the ABCMR to conclude that he must show he reenlisted or otherwise extended his 17 March 1995 enlistment.  He states that the 25 February 2002 letter was not sent to him in error and that he is being denied the benefit of being a member of the IRR from 2002 to the present based on an unsupportable argument that the 25 February 2002 letter was sent in error.  The applicant states that there is ample evidence to support the proposition that he served his country with distinction and that he should not be denied the benefits that he is seeking.  He concludes that the remedy for this injustice would be to amend his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve as of February 2002 or that he was in the IRR as he was informed by ARPERSCOM.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080003647, on 22 May 2008.

2.  The applicant provides a new argument that was not previously considered that requires consideration.

3.  After completing 17 years, 3 months, and 6 days prior service as a member of the Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 13 May 1987.  On 15 September 1990, he was furnished a notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (20-year letter).  The applicant will reach age 60 on 26 January 2010.

4.  The applicant reenlisted in the USAR for 3 years on 2 May 1992 and then again for 6 years on 17 March 1995.

5.  On 26 September 1995, Orders 95-269-049 (involuntarily) transferred the applicant to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due to maximum years of service.

6.  ARPERSCOM Orders C-02-004190 were published on 15 February 2000 reassigning the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to a troop program unit (TPU).  On 12 April 2000, Orders Number 006368 was published ordering the applicant to annual training for 14 days, effective 6 May 2000.

7.  On 31 October 2001, 94th Regional Support Command Orders 01-304-004 were published honorably discharging the applicant from the USAR at the expiration of his term of service (ETS), effective 31 October 2001.  These orders show he was held beyond his service obligation date through no fault of his own.

8.  On 19 December 2001, the applicant received a letter from ARPERSCOM notifying him that as a member of a USAR TPU requests for corrections of points or other correspondence must go through his chain of command and to resubmit his documentation or correspondence to his unit of assignment.

9.  In a letter dated 26 December 2001, the applicant informed an ARPERSCOM official he had received her letter dated 19 December 2001 and that he was returning his request pertaining to military records for processing, along with a copy of Orders 01-304-004, dated 31 October 2001.  In the letter the applicant stated that his ETS date was to be January 2001 and that in September 2000, he requested through his commander to be transferred to the IRR.  He stated that he contacted his unit on 10 September 2001 to inform them that he had heard nothing in regard to his request of September 2000.  In the letter, the applicant stated that he contacted his unit again on 12 September 2001 to volunteer his services as a military policeman due to the 11 September 2001 attacks.  He stated that he was told that nothing could be done until his 201 file was located; and that on 1 October 2001, he was advised to contact ARPERSCOM to request a records search and at that time he was told he would be honorably discharged as of 31 October 2001.  In the letter, the applicant stated that in early November 2001, he contacted a recruiter and as of 26 December 2001, his records had not been located.

10.  On 8 January 2002, Orders D-01200737 were published by ARPERSCOM honorably discharging the applicant from the USAR effective 8 January 2002.

11.  On 25 February 2002, ARPERSCOM forwarded a letter to the applicant welcoming him to the IRR and explaining his available options.

12.  The Soldier Management System, Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, Missouri (formerly ARPERSCOM), shows the applicant inquired about being transferred to the Retired Reserve on 17 January 2008.  It states, "Soldier was discharged from the IRR in 2002.  He wants to be transferred to the Retired Reserves instead.  I told him this command will not change/revoke the order and place him in the Retired Reserves because the order was cut in 2002.  I told him he would have to go through ARBA and file a claim with them.  I then proceeded to explain the difference to him between the Retired Reserves and being discharged.  I also explained how this affects his retirement at age 60.  Call not forwarded."

13.  Army Regulation 140-1 (Army Reserve Mission, Organization, and Training) provides policy guidance on the mission, organization, and training of the USAR.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the USAR is a Federal force which is comprised of the Ready Reserve, the Standby Reserve, and the Retired Reserve.

14.  The Retired Reserve consists of Soldiers who retain their status as Reserves of the Army and who are or have been removed from an active status, or have been assigned at their requests and are otherwise qualified.

15.  The Reserve Control Group (Standby) consists of Standby Reserve Soldiers on the inactive list who qualify for assignment.  These Soldiers are not authorized Reserve duty training, retirement point credit, or promotion consideration.

16.  The Ready Reserve Control Group consists of non-unit Ready Reserve Soldiers with a training obligation and must take part in annual training when so directed.  The Ready Reserve Control Group is comprised of Annual Training, Individual Mobilization Augmentees, Reinforcement, Active Guard Reserve, Reserve Officers' Training Corps, and other various groups.

17.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Army Reserve Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR Soldiers.  Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of Soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

18.  Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations), in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted Soldiers from the Reserve Components.  Paragraph 1-30 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a Soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud.  After the effective date of discharge, orders could be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.
19.  Army Regulation 135-178 also states that upon expiration of term of service (ETS), the Soldier will be discharged by the separation authority.  It also states that when through administrative error a Soldier is not discharged on the actual date of his or her ETS, he or she will be considered to have been retained beyond normal discharge date for the convenience of the Government.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show that was transferred to the IRR on 6 January 2003 and subsequently transferred to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged.

2.  He also contends that the erroneous notifications that were forwarded to him by ARPERSCOM showing that he was discharged from the USAR on 8 January 2002 and welcoming him to the IRR on 25 February 2002 denied him the opportunity to elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in the year 2002.

3.  He further contends that since he had previously been in the IRR, it is not unreasonable to conclude that he would have, and did, timely request to be returned to the IRR upon completion of his “active duty” on 6 May 2000.  

4.  The applicant’s contentions have been considered; however, the available evidence shows his contentions are without merit.  There is no evidence of record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to show that he requested to be transferred to the IRR or the Retired Reserve prior to his discharge from the USAR on 31 October 2001.

5.  The applicant admits that he was informed on 1 October 2001 he was being discharged effective 31 October 2001.  His ETS would have been 16 March 2001 had he not been held beyond his service obligation date through no fault of his own.  He did not inquire about being transferred to the Retired Reserve until 17 January 2008.  It appears he did not inquire about reenlisting.  Additionally, he provides no explanation as to why he believed that he could be discharged on 31 October 2001 and then discharged again on 8 January 2002.  

6.  The applicant had from the time that he received his 20-year letter on 15 September 1990 until his discharge on 31 October 2001 to submit his request to be transferred to the Retired Reserve and he failed to do so.  His records are void of any evidence that shows he made an effort to request transfer to the Retired Reserve once he was informed that he was being discharged from the USAR on 31 October 2001.  By the time he received the ARPERSCOM letter dated 25 February 2002, he was already ineligible to request transfer to the Retired Reserve.
7.  The applicant was a member of the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) at the time that he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 31 October 2001, after being held beyond his ETS.  Although it appears that he was erroneously notified that he was being discharged from the USAR effective 8 January 2002 and that he was a member of the IRR, the erroneous notification does not negate the fact that Orders 01-304-004 were published honorably discharging him from the USAR, effective 31 October 2001 as a result of his ETS. 

8.  In accordance with the applicable regulation, orders discharging a Soldier will not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there is a manifest error or fraud.  There does not appear to be any error or fraud in the orders that discharged him from the USAR and the applicant has provided no evidence to show that he made a timely request to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

9.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  __x______  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080003647, dated 22 May 2008.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009163



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009163



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003647

    Original file (20080003647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. AR-PERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, show that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective that date. In pertinent part, it stated that promotion vacancies were not required for IRR promotions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081391C070215

    Original file (2002081391C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 29 May 2001 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided; that he be given adequate time to reenlist in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) or to be transferred to the Standby Reserve for medical reasons; and that his 1995 reenlistment date be corrected to read 14 July 1995 vice 31 January 1995. It contains a recommendation that the applicant’s request be denied because he failed to take a medical examination within the required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068192C070402

    Original file (2002068192C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The official further stated that by regulation, eligible soldiers must request transfer to the Retired Reserve, and those who do not elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve within 30 days of the date they are notified that they are being removed from an active status will be discharged. Since no request for transfer to the Retired Reserve was received from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068816C070402

    Original file (2002068816C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders Number 018-010, dated 18 January 2001, issued by the Military Department of Indiana, directs that the applicant be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve member of the Army, effective 18 December 2000. Further, the Board finds an unintentional injustice was served upon the applicant as a result of her never being properly counseled on the service remaining requirement for her to be transferred to the USAR, and because she was never afforded the opportunity to take the necessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075415C070403

    Original file (2002075415C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It indicated that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two option notification letters after failing to maintain an active status by earning the required 50 points in the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) on 11 July 1997. The evidence of record confirms that on 18 February 2000, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two notification and option letters after failing to maintain active status by earning 50...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091194C070212

    Original file (2003091194C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records were not available to the Board. The ARPERSCOM advisory opinion points out that the applicant requested retirement point credit service performed between the effective date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve, 9 October 1996, and the date when his official orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve were actually published, 29 August 1997. At this time, the applicant was given the option of accepting separation pay or changing the effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079279C070215

    Original file (2002079279C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If a VSI recipient becomes ineligible to continue to serve in the Ready Reserve, through no fault of his or her own, the soldier will be transferred to the Retired Reserve and continue to receive annual VSI payments for the remaining period authorized for VSI. The Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074446C070403

    Original file (2002074446C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. A review of the applicant’s records shows that he was an exceptional soldier in all aspects of his military career. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 29 January 1999 discharge from the USAR pertaining to the individual concerned and by transferring him to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072547C070403

    Original file (2002072547C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities governing the granting of retired pay to soldiers and former Reserve component soldiers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056796C070420

    Original file (2001056796C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She further states that had she known this she would not have reenlisted for another 3 years. On 4 May 2000, the ARPERSCOM published orders discharging her from the USAR effective 10 May 2000. Therefore, the Board finds that her discharged orders should be revoked and that she be reinstated to her previous status in the USAR with credit for all drills (points only) that she earned during the appropriate retirement years.