Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069110C070402
Original file (2002069110C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 13 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002069110

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal       hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge orders be voided and that he be reinstated to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve).

APPLICANT STATES: That he received his 20-year letter in 1994 and started submitting the paperwork; however, before he could finish, he had already been separated. He goes on to state that this did not present a problem until 11 September 2001, when he contacted officials at the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) to have his name put on the volunteer list and was informed that he was fully retired. He further states that this was never his intent from the onset and that he would like to be able to assist wherever his nation needs him.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant served in the United States Marine Corps for a period of 9 years, 7 months and 21 days. He was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-6 on 7 September 1977.

On 19 January 1980, he was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant and remained in the USAR. He was promoted to the rank of major on 14 March 1992. His Retirement Year Ending (RYE) month was January of every year.

In October 1994, the ARPERSCOM sent the applicant a notification letter informing him that he had not earned enough points to be credited for a creditable year of service for retirement in RYE January 1995. He was informed that he was required to be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve, if he so requested. He was given a 30-day suspense in which to make an election on the option form provided and he failed to do so.

On 29 August 1995, orders were published by the ARPERSCOM discharging him from the USAR effective the same date.

Army Regulation 135-175 provides the criteria for removing USAR members from an active status. It provides, in pertinent part, that an officer who is removed from active status will be discharged from the USAR unless he or she applies for transfer to the Retired Reserve or Inactive Reserve within 30 days of notification advising them that they are required to be removed from an active USAR Status.

Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR soldiers. Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the Reserve Components. Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. After the effective date of discharge, orders could not be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.

Due to recent Departmental changes, certain benefits, such as commissary and post exchange privileges, accrue to Reservists with more than 20 years of qualifying service for retirement at age 60 and who have terminated their Reserve status. Such personnel are required to present their 20-year letter at the nearest military identification (ID) card issuing facility to obtain their “Gray Area” benefits.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. While the Board commends the applicant for his desire to continue to contribute to the defense of the nation, that in itself is not a basis to void a properly effected discharge. The applicant was given more than sufficient time to respond to the notification informing him of his options and failed to do so. Accordingly, he was properly discharged from the USAR.

3. Because entitlement laws have changed, the applicant is now eligible for “Gray Area” benefits from a discharged status and his retired pay will not be jeopardized by his status, there is no basis to void a duly constituted discharge order.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___dh___ ___cla___ __be____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002069110
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/06/13
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1995/08/29
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR135-175
DISCHARGE REASON UNSAT PART
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 335 135.0300/CHG STATUS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068192C070402

    Original file (2002068192C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The official further stated that by regulation, eligible soldiers must request transfer to the Retired Reserve, and those who do not elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve within 30 days of the date they are notified that they are being removed from an active status will be discharged. Since no request for transfer to the Retired Reserve was received from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082034C070215

    Original file (2002082034C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the USAR Retired Reserve. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge from the USAR was unjust for the following reasons: he responded to the option letter provided him prior to the effective date of his discharge; his intent to enter the Retired Reserve was clearly established in his response to this option letter; he was not given...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100025C070208

    Original file (2004100025C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his 20 December 1999 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from the USAR in 1999 because he had only 49 points, which was a mistake because he had 51 points, and he had already received his 20-year letter and should have been transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged. Officials at the HRC-SL opined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069801C070402

    Original file (2002069801C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his 11 January 2002 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve, however, he did not do so within the established suspense date he was given and thus was discharged.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075415C070403

    Original file (2002075415C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It indicated that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two option notification letters after failing to maintain an active status by earning the required 50 points in the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) on 11 July 1997. The evidence of record confirms that on 18 February 2000, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two notification and option letters after failing to maintain active status by earning 50...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087273C070212

    Original file (2003087273C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he completed the 20 years of qualifying service necessary to receive Reserve non-regular retired pay at age 60. This official further stated that at the time the applicant had 19 years of qualifying service for retirement, he was given the authority to stay in the active Reserve until he attained 20 qualifying years of service or reached age sixty, whichever came first, and the applicant had attained age...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009163

    Original file (20090009163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. He states that paragraph 3 of the ABCMR’s decision states that his records contain ARPERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, that erroneously show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 January 2002 and that it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074446C070403

    Original file (2002074446C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. A review of the applicant’s records shows that he was an exceptional soldier in all aspects of his military career. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 29 January 1999 discharge from the USAR pertaining to the individual concerned and by transferring him to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001419

    Original file (20090001419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests credit of 50 retirement points per year from the date of discharge from the USAR Control Group on 20 April 1998 to the date of transfer to Retired Reserve status. The applicant contends that his discharge orders should be revoked and he should be transferred to the Retired Reserve and that he should be granted 50 retirement points for each year from the date he was discharged from the USAR until the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. With respect to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080022C070215

    Original file (2002080022C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from his United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit on 10 June 2001, approximately 8 months after he received his 20 -year letter. While the Board cannot ascertain why the applicant was not advised or why he was discharged after his ETS, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that given his qualifying years of creditable service for retired pay purposes, had he been afforded the opportunity prior to discharge, he would have elected to be...