Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075415C070403
Original file (2002075415C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 7 November 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002075415


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be allowed to transfer to the Retired Reserve or to be reinstated into the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that the Orders Number D-03-13342, dated
1 March 2000, published by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) should be revoked, and that he should be transferred to the Retired Reserve or the IRR. In support of his application, he submits a copy of Orders D-03-13342, and a Chronological Statement of Retirement Points
(ARPC Form 249-E), dated 13 July 2001.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he is was serving in the rank and pay grade of major/04 (MAJ/04) when Orders Number D-03-13342, dated 1 March 2000, was published by the ARPERSCOM, directing that he be honorably discharged him from the USAR on 18 February 2000.

5. During the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from a personnel official of the ARPERSCOM Transition and Separation Branch. It indicated that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two option notification letters after failing to maintain an active status by earning the required 50 points in the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) on
11 July 1997. As a result of the applicant’s failure to respond, discharge orders were published in accordance with the applicable regulations. However, this ARPERSCOM personnel official also confirms that a subsequent review determined that the applicant had in fact earned the 50 points necessary to maintain his active status in the RYE on 11 July 1997. Therefore, it was recommended that the applicant’s discharge orders be voided and that he be allowed to transfer to the Retired Reserve as requested or to be reinstated into the IRR. On 29 August 2002, a copy of this advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant in order to provide him an opportunity to respond. To date, he has failed to reply.

6. The ARPC Form 249-E dated 13 July 2001, submitted by the applicant shows he earned 50 retirements in the RYE on 11 July 1997.

7. Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1215.00 contains guidance on Removal from USAR Active Status and it mandates that Reservists who have qualified for retirement except for having reach 60 years of age are required to attain 50 points annually during their anniversary year to be retained in the IRR. Waiver of that requirement on a one-time basis may be made under exceptional circumstances by the Secretary of the Military Department concerned.


CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the Orders D-03-13342, dated 1 March 2000, published by ARPERSCOM, which directed his discharge from the USAR should be voided and it finds this claim has merit.

2. The evidence of record confirms that on 18 February 2000, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two notification and option letters after failing to maintain active status by earning 50 retirements in the RYE on 11 July 1997, and as a result was discharged from the USAR in accordance with applicable regulations.

3. However, the evidence of records also confirms that ARPERSCOM personnel officials verified that the applicant did earn the necessary 50 points for the RYE on 11 July 1997, as evidenced by the enclosed ARPC Form 249-E, dated 13 July 2001. In view of this fact, the Board concurs with the recommendation contained in the APERSCOM advisory opinion that applicant’s discharge from the USAR be voided, and that he be reinstated in the IRR.

4. In addition, the Board concludes that upon his reinstatement in the IRR the applicant’s participation requirements for the years 2000, 2001, and 2002 should be waived. It finds this waiver is appropriate based on the applicant’s erroneous discharge and in order to allow him the choice to continue his service in the IRR or to transfer to the Retired Reserve.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the USAR discharge of the individual concerned directed in Orders Number D-03-13342, dated 1 March 2000, published by ARPERSCOM; showing that he was assigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), IRR, continuously from 18 February 2000, and that his participation requirements for the RYE in 2000, 2001, and 2002 are waived; and providing him the option to remain in the IRR or transfer to the Retired Reserve subsequent to making the corrections outlined above.

BOARD VOTE:

__RVO__ __TBR _ __DPH __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. _
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002075415
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/11/07
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.0200
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068192C070402

    Original file (2002068192C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The official further stated that by regulation, eligible soldiers must request transfer to the Retired Reserve, and those who do not elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve within 30 days of the date they are notified that they are being removed from an active status will be discharged. Since no request for transfer to the Retired Reserve was received from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016026C070206

    Original file (20050016026C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of AHRC Form 249-2 (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 9 June 2005, which shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant had completed 17 qualifying years, at the time the form was produced. Paragraph 2-8 defines qualifying service and states, in pertinent part, that a Reserve Component Soldier must earn a minimum of 50 retirement points each retirement year to have that year credited as qualifying service. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087273C070212

    Original file (2003087273C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he completed the 20 years of qualifying service necessary to receive Reserve non-regular retired pay at age 60. This official further stated that at the time the applicant had 19 years of qualifying service for retirement, he was given the authority to stay in the active Reserve until he attained 20 qualifying years of service or reached age sixty, whichever came first, and the applicant had attained age...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056796C070420

    Original file (2001056796C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She further states that had she known this she would not have reenlisted for another 3 years. On 4 May 2000, the ARPERSCOM published orders discharging her from the USAR effective 10 May 2000. Therefore, the Board finds that her discharged orders should be revoked and that she be reinstated to her previous status in the USAR with credit for all drills (points only) that she earned during the appropriate retirement years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063847C070421

    Original file (2001063847C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that as a member of the IRR, who had completed 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay, he was required to earn a minimum of 50 points in each subsequent RYE; however, he failed to earn 50 retirement points, was declared an unsatisfactory participant, and was discharged. The Board notes that the applicant’s ARPC Form 249-2-E, dated 23 February 2001, shows that he completed 20 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes and that he meets...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066598C070402

    Original file (2002066598C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation, 140-185, Training and Retirement Point Credits and unit level Strength Accounting Records, provides guidance for awarding the retirement points and establishing RYE dates. By regulation, if a service member is separated or removed from an active status during a retirement year, the member is credited with a proportion maximum number of points for that year and that retirement points may not be transferred from one retirement year to another. The evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015298

    Original file (20090015298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be retained in the USAR. The applicant's ARPC Form 249-E shows he did not attain 50 retirement points for 2 years after his transfer to the USAR. There is no evidence the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082034C070215

    Original file (2002082034C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the USAR Retired Reserve. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge from the USAR was unjust for the following reasons: he responded to the option letter provided him prior to the effective date of his discharge; his intent to enter the Retired Reserve was clearly established in his response to this option letter; he was not given...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074840C070403

    Original file (2002074840C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The evidence of record fails to show that ARPERSCOM personnel officials properly notified the applicant of his option to transfer to the Retired Reserve in connection with his mandated separation from the USAR. Given the facts and circumstances of this case, the Board finds sufficient reason to believe the applicant was never...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003972

    Original file (20110003972.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by the September 2005 Special Selection Board (SSB) with back pay and allowances and placement on the Retired List in the grade of LTC. However, despite being in the Retired Reserve, in 1993 he was considered for promotion to MAJ, but he was not selected. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Voiding Orders 08-036-00050, issued by Headquarters,...