| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart as well as any other awards he is entitled to receive.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam; however, it was never entered on his report of separation (DD Form 214).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in Providence, Rhode Island on 5 January 1967. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 6 February 1968. He was assigned to Troop B, 3d Squadron, 4th Cavalry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division for duty as an armor intelligence specialist.
5. On 14 March 1968, he received fragmentation wounds to the body and was evacuated to a hospital in the theater. He was subsequently transferred to Valley Forge General Hospital (VFGH) in Phoenixville, Pennsylvania on 22 April 1968. He remained at VFGH until 27 June 1968, when he was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky. He remained at Fort Knox until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-4 on 18 December 1968. He had served 1 year, 11 months and 14 days of total active service and was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the National Defense Service Medal. His records show that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no derogatory information contained in his records.
6. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, prescribed Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year, qualifies for award of the AGCM.
7. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.
8. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded while in Vietnam and that he was evacuated to a hospital for treatment. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that he was in fact awarded the Purple Heart as he claims. Therefore, since it appears that an administrative oversight resulted in the omission of that award, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to add it at this time.
2. Although awarded subsequent to the applicant’s REFRAD, the applicant was entitled to be awarded the RVMGC w/Palm and RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citations. Accordingly, it should be done so at this time.
3. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 5 January 1967 to 18 December 1968. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
4. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart.
b. by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm and RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citations; and
c. by awarding him the AGCM for the period of 5 January 1967 to 18 December 1968.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Karol A. Kennedy____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065469 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/23 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PLUS |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 2. 102 | 107.0056/AGCM |
| 3. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 4. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018837
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding his award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's official records shows that he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his entire service and his records are void of any derogatory information that could serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076701C070215
He had served 1 year, 11 months and 11 days of total active service and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. A review of his records, to include his separation medical examination, fails to show that he was ever treated for any wounds or injuries incurred as a result of enemy action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080013C070215
However, the evidence of record does establish that he is entitled to be awarded the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the MUC and four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 14 November 1967 through 12 July 1969. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068947C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Although his records contain no evidence that he was awarded the Purple Heart for his wound, the certificate provided by the applicant shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart by the hospital commander on 23 January 1969, for wounds received in action on 13 December 1968. After carefully examining the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001388
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action on 19 September 1967 in Vietnam and that he was medically evacuated for treatment and he was subsequently retired as a result of permanent physical disability. After carefully examining the applicants record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 4 April 1966 through 22 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090245C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Although there are no orders present in the applicant's records to verify his claim that he was awarded the Purple Heart in Vietnam, there is sufficient evidence available...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082331C070215
He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066313C070402
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Although awarded subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, the applicant was entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/Palm and RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citations as well as the VUA. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 19 September 1966 through 18 September 1968.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065585C070421
Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, prescribed Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). At the time of the applicant’s REFRAD, his records should have reflected his awards of the Purple Heart and the Air Medal. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 1 August 1966 to 17 May 1968.