| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member | ||
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect two awards of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded two Purple Hearts; however, only one is reflected on his DD Form 214, which has an effect on veterans benefits.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Los Angeles, California, for a period of 3 years and training in the armor career group. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 21 August 1967. He was initially assigned to Company H, 2nd Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment and was transferred to D Troop, 17th Cavalry Regiment on 6 November 1967, for duty as an armor intelligence specialist.
5. On 6 December 1967, he sustained fragmentation wounds to both shoulders and the right thigh. He also received burns to his face and was hospitalized first at the 24th Evacuation Hospital, where he was awarded the Purple Heart on 7 December 1967. He was subsequently evacuated to the 106th General Hospital, where he remained until he was returned to his unit on 2 January 1968.
6. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 21 March 1968 and departed Vietnam on 20 August 1968, for assignment to Fort Hood, Texas. He remained at Fort Hood until he was again transferred to Vietnam on 25 March 1969 and was assigned to B Troop, 2nd Battalion, 17th Cavalry Regiment.
7. On 2 June 1969, he sustained a gun shot wound to the right leg and was awarded a Purple Heart on 17 June 1969.
8. He was promoted to the rank of sergeant (E-5) on 16 October 1969 and departed Vietnam on 8 January 1970. He was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington, where he was honorably released from active duty early to attend school. He had served 2 years, 9 months and 21 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Air Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) and the Purple Heart. His records also indicate that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service
9. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, prescribed Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year, qualifies for award of the AGCM. Disqualification for award of the AGCM requires specific action by the commander in writing, to disqualify a member and it must be referred to the individual for comment.
10. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation and the VUA for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned. He also participated in seven campaigns during his assignment to Vietnam which entitles him to one silver and two bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214.
2. Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records at this time to show that he was awarded two Purple Hearts (PH w/1OLC).
3. The Board also notes that he was entitled to be awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and one silver and two bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM. Accordingly, it should be done at this time.
4. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
5. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart (PH 1 OLC) and by awarding him the AGCM for the period of 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, and one silver and two bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM.
BOARD VOTE:
___ao___ ___ym___ __jpi____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Arthur A. Omartian___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003087226 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/07/24 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000/CORR 214 |
| 2. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 3. 102 | 107.0056/AGCM |
| 4. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 5. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078323C070215
In support of his application he submits statements from the company executive officer (a Retired colonel) and two former members of his unit who were present when he was wounded and a copy of the orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Accordingly, the Board must presume that given the circumstances surrounding the attack, the large number of soldiers killed and wounded and the confusion that followed thereafter, that because the applicant was returned to duty after medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015603
His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Purple Heart, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and three Overseas Service Bars. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091574C070212
The applicant states that he received three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam; however, none of them are entered on his DD Form 214. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212
A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068780C070402
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Although the applicant’s separation medical examination indicates that the applicant sustained injuries in Vietnam, there is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was wounded or injured in Vietnam during an action by enemy forces. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001479
Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicants unit was subsequently awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083341C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for wounds/injuries received in Vietnam on 9 January 1968. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074809C070403
However, his records do contain orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) on 13 June 1968, which was not recorded on his DD Form 214 at the time of his REFRAD. While the applicant’s records do not contain a copy of the orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his records clearly contain information showing that he was wounded in combat on 14 May 1967 and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080933C070215
He further states that his commander recommended him for the Silver Star and he should have also received the Purple Heart for his wounds. Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines that the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to them. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received...