| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that he was awarded the Purple Heart while he was stationed in Vietnam in 1967. He states that he was in the field when he was presented with the Purple Heart; however, it was omitted from his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army in Chicago, Illinois, on 19 September 1966 and he successfully completed his training as a cannoneer. On 28 January 1967, he was transferred to Vietnam and was assigned to Company C, 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment. He was subsequently assigned to Battery B, 1st Battalion, 84th Artillery.
5. His awards include the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Expert Badge (Rifle M-14).
6. A review of the medical documentation contained in the applicant’s records show that on 6 June 1967, while he was in Vietnam, he was treated by medical personnel for a shrapnel wound to his right leg.
7. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 January 1968. He departed Vietnam on 22 February 1968 and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 18 September 1968, due to the expiration of his term of service. He had served 2 years of total active service and had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. His records contain no evidence of any disciplinary action being taken against him during his service.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
9. That regulation also prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.
10. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.
11. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) for service in Vietnam, during the period in which the applicant served in the unit.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows that he was wounded and treated by a medical physician for a shrapnel wound he received in his right leg while serving in Vietnam. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that he was awarded the Purple Heart as he claims and that an administrative error was made which resulted in the omission of the Purple Heart. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct that error at this time.
2. Although awarded subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, the applicant was entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/Palm and RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citations as well as the VUA. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award them to him at this time and to correct his records accordingly.
3. Inasmuch as the applicant was in Vietnam performing the duties as a cannoneer when he was wounded, it is reasonable to presume that the wound was a result of hostile action by enemy forces and that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
4. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 19 September 1966 through 18 September 1968. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds that he received in his right leg on 6 June 1967.
b. by awarding him the AGCM for the period of 19 September 1966 through 18 September 1968, while serving in the pay grade of E-4; and
c. by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and the VUA.
BOARD VOTE:
___fe ___ __pm ___ __ra ____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Fred N. Eichorn_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002066313 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/05/16 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 46 | 107.0000 |
| 2. 61 | 107.0015 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074809C070403
However, his records do contain orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) on 13 June 1968, which was not recorded on his DD Form 214 at the time of his REFRAD. While the applicant’s records do not contain a copy of the orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his records clearly contain information showing that he was wounded in combat on 14 May 1967 and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088374C070403
The Board is convinced by the evidence submitted with his application that he was in fact wounded in action with the enemy on Vietnam on 1 March 1965, while serving in the rank of private first class (PFC) and that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 8 October 1963 through 25 September 1966. c. by awarding him the AGCM for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091574C070212
The applicant states that he received three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam; however, none of them are entered on his DD Form 214. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076701C070215
He had served 1 year, 11 months and 11 days of total active service and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. A review of his records, to include his separation medical examination, fails to show that he was ever treated for any wounds or injuries incurred as a result of enemy action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015603
His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Purple Heart, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and three Overseas Service Bars. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058534C070421
The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries received in Vietnam. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 8 May 1967 for duty as an infantryman. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided the criteria for award or disqualification of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083341C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for wounds/injuries received in Vietnam on 9 January 1968. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000402C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000402 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...