| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Linda D. Simmons | Member | ||
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and any other awards he is authorized.
3. The applicant states that he was wounded in the right arm in November 1968 while serving in Vietnam. He further states that he was awarded the Purple Heart; however, his report of separation (DD Form 214) does not reflect that award. He goes on to state that he desires to be awarded any other awards to which he is entitled.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Puerto Rico on 14 November 1967 for a period of 2 years. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 13 July 1968. He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, for duty as a radio teletype operator. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 17 July 1968.
5. He departed Vietnam on 12 July 1969 and was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) prior to the expiration of his term of service (ETYS) to attend school. He had served 1 year, 7 months and 29 days of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
6. A review of the applicant's records shows that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no evidence of any derogatory information. Additionally, there is no indication in the available records to show that he was wounded, that he received treatment for wounds or injuries or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
8. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation. The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) during the period he was assigned to the unit. In addition, the applicant participated in four campaigns and is entitled to the award of four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM.
9. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was wounded in action against the enemy, that his wound was treated and made a matter of record, or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, absent evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no basis to correct his records to reflect the award of the Purple Heart or to award him one at this time.
2. However, the evidence of record does establish that he is entitled to be awarded the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the MUC and four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM.
3. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 14 November 1967 through 12 July 1969. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
4. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the AGCM for the period of 14 November 1967 through 12 July 1969, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the MUC and four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__jm____ ___lds __ __tbr ___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Thomas B. Redfern____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002080013 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/05/01 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PARTIAL |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 2. 80 | 107.0034/MUC |
| 3. 102 | 107.0056/AGCM |
| 4. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 5. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001479
Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicants unit was subsequently awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090245C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Although there are no orders present in the applicant's records to verify his claim that he was awarded the Purple Heart in Vietnam, there is sufficient evidence available...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011742
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to add all decorations and awards to which he is entitled. Additionally, after carefully examining the applicants record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 19 April 1966 through 18 April 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM for the period of 19 April 1966 through 18...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077114C070215
The Soldier’s Medal is awarded to any person of the Armed Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who, while serving in any capacity with the Army of the United states, distinguished himself or herself by heroism not involving actual conflict with the enemy. The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. Additionally, there is no evidence that the applicant was recommended for an award of the Soldier’s Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080933C070215
He further states that his commander recommended him for the Silver Star and he should have also received the Purple Heart for his wounds. Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines that the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to them. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001388
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action on 19 September 1967 in Vietnam and that he was medically evacuated for treatment and he was subsequently retired as a result of permanent physical disability. After carefully examining the applicants record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 4 April 1966 through 22 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000307C070205
John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant sustained shrapnel wounds in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time; however, it appears that an administrative oversight resulted in his not being awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083054C070215
He had served 1 year, 11 months and 22 days of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Good Conduct Medal. The Board has noted the applicant's contentions; however, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his applicant or the evidence of record that he was wounded/injured as result of enemy action and that he was treated for the wound/injury at the time. In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...