Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056780C070420
Original file (2001056780C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 31 July 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001056780

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. John T. Meixell Member
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and his reentry (RE) code be changed to a code that will allow him to reenter military service.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he desires restoration to active duty or an opportunity to again enlist and serve on active duty. He goes on to state that he made a grave mistake during his first enlistment by getting into a fight and injuring another soldier and realizes that there was no excuse for his misconduct. However, he has matured since that occurred and has married a soldier on active duty who is currently stationed in Germany. He further states that he desires an opportunity to show that he can be a squared away soldier and that he has a lot to offer. He asks the Board for an opportunity to overcome his past so that he can start a family. In support of his application he submits a statement in his own behalf, the results of his appellate review, a favorable counseling statement rendered while on active duty, and four third party character references.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted at Fort Meade, Maryland on 26 August 1998 for a period of 3 years and training as a quartermaster/chemical equipment repairer. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Germany on or about 26 February 1999.

On 4 August 1999 he was convicted by a special court-martial of committing an assault upon another soldier on 15 May 1999 by punching and kicking him with a means likely to produce death or grievous bodily harm, to wit: repeatedly in the head and face with a booted foot. He plead guilty to the charges and was sentenced to confinement for 2 months, reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a bad conduct discharge (BCD).

On 12 October 2000, the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority.

The applicant was discharged on 18 June 2001, pursuant to the sentence of a court-martial, with a BCD. He had served 2 years, 8 months and 2 days of total active service and had approximately 50 days of lost time due to confinement.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant was properly discharged pursuant to a sentence by a special court-martial with no indication of any violations of any of his rights.

3. The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to the seriousness of the charges for which he was convicted and his overall undistinguished record of service.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____wtm_ __jm____ ___ao___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001056780
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2001/07/31
TYPE OF DISCHARGE BCD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 2001/06/18
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY BCD
DISCHARGE REASON A68.00/BCD
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 675 144.6800/A68.00/BCD
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090122C070212

    Original file (2003090122C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: He was sentenced to confinement for a period of 1 year, reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a BCD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081090C070215

    Original file (2002081090C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board noted the applicant's military awards, but did not find them sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade in his discharge. The Board congratulates the applicant on his conduct since he has been separated, however, this does not provide the Board a basis upon which to grant clemency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073803C070403

    Original file (2002073803C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The general court-martial convening authority disapproved his request on 19 December 1991. The Board finds no basis in the evidence of record that is sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to the seriousness of his offenses and his overall record of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070479C070402

    Original file (2002070479C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He further states that there were mistakes made in the conduct of his urinalysis that should have been questioned and contends that he should have been afforded treatment for his chemical dependency problem. The Board opined at that time that he had been properly discharged pursuant to a general court-martial conviction; however, the Board determined that his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072224C070403

    Original file (2002072224C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and any issues submitted, the Board found no cause for clemency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057205C070420

    Original file (2001057205C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067733C070402

    Original file (2002067733C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The specifics are not present in the available records; however, his records do show that he was reduced to the pay grade of E-4 on that date. On 28 June 1985, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence as approved by the court-martial convening authority.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088587C070403

    Original file (2003088587C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057278C070420

    Original file (2001057278C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071577C070402

    Original file (2002071577C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He departed Germany on 21 July 1978, en route to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with a report date of 24 August 1978. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as AWOL from 24 August 1978, until he was returned to military control on 7 September and charges were preferred against him for the absent without leave (AWOL) offense.