| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he made a mistake at the time because he was young and did not understand the rules and laws of military life. He goes on to state that at the time, he had gotten married after completing high school with hopes to be a family man with purpose. He completed his training and was transferred to Germany. He loved his assignment and his job and wanted his wife to join him; however, she would not join him and he did not understand why. He continues by stating that he began to get involved with alcohol and drugs because he could not understand why his wife would not join him. His problems really bothered him and his chain of command would not allow him to go home. His parents advised him to finish his time and not worry about what was going on at home, but it really bothered him. When he completed his tour in Germany he was sent to Fort Benning, Georgia, and his problems with his wife continued. He began to go home to Alabama and somehow get side-tracked and overstay his leave. He further states that he is sorry for what he did and he would like the Board to know that he currently suffers from Diabetes and really needs the benefits of medical care that an upgrade of his discharge would provide.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 2 May 1957 and enlisted in Montgomery, Alabama, on 8 March 1976, for a period of 4 years, training as an infantryman, assignment to Europe and a cash enlistment bonus. At the time of his enlistment, he indicated that he completed high school in June 1975 and was single. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Germany on 24 July 1976, for duty as an indirect fire infantryman.
On 3 July 1977, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for stealing a stereo system from another soldier. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
On 29 June 1978, NJP was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty. His punishment consisted of restriction for 7 days.
On 18 July 1978, NJP was imposed against him for using obscene language towards a civilian woman. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a forfeiture of pay.
He departed Germany on 21 July 1978, en route to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with a report date of 24 August 1978. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as AWOL from 24 August 1978, until he was returned to military control on 7 September and charges were preferred against him for the absent without leave (AWOL) offense.
He was convicted by a summary court-martial at Fort Campbell on 5 October 1978, of being AWOL from 24 August through 6 September 1978. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days, reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a forfeiture of pay. He was transferred to the Army Retraining Brigade at Fort Riley, Kansas, to serve his confinement.
On 21 November 1978, while still in the Retraining Brigade, NJP was imposed against him for missing bed check. His punishment consisted of extra duty and restriction (suspended for 60 days).
He departed Fort Riley on 21 January 1979 for an assignment to Fort Benning, with a report date of 13 February 1979. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as AWOL, effective 13 February 1979. He remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Benning on 20 March 1979. He again departed AWOL from 13 April to 4 May 1979, 18 June to 26 June 1979, 2 July to 23 July 1979, 4 September to 7 September 1979 and 10 September to 11 September 1979.
He was convicted by a special court-martial of the AWOL offenses on 15 October 1979 and was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 3 months, a forfeiture of pay and a bad conduct discharge. He was transferred to the Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas to serve his confinement.
On 31 January 1980, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence as approved by the special court-martial convening authority.
Accordingly, he was discharged on 19 May 1980, under other than honorable conditions, pursuant to a duly reviewed and affirmed special court-martial conviction. He had served 3 years, 7 months and 28 days of total active service and had 209 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 25 August 1981. He asserted at that time that he had served his 3 months in prison and deserved to have his discharge upgraded because he had paid for his mistake. The ADRB determined that he had been properly discharged pursuant to a duly constituted court-martial and voted unanimously to deny his application on 2 February 1983.
Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Board is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
2. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore appear to be appropriate considering the available facts of the case.
3. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to the seriousness of his offense and his overall undistinguished record of service.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___mvt __ ___le ___ ___rjw __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002071577 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/08/08 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1980/05/19 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | BCD |
| DISCHARGE REASON | SPCM |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 685 | 144.6800/A68.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072759C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to either an honorable or medical discharge. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he should have been discharged by reason of medical disability because he was addicted to drugs and alcohol and was never offered any help for his illness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080134C070215
The record contains no evidence that he was ever punished for this offense. On 28 January 1987, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for clemency The available records contains no medical evidence and the applicant has provided no evidence that demonstrates he suffers from an illness or an injury that was either incurred in, or aggravated as a result of his military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024766
He departed Germany on 30 November 1978 to serve his sentence to confinement in the States. His unit commander initiated action to discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-33b(1), for misconduct, due to frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008367
On 8 December 1978, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Chapter 10 (Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial), Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), and understood that he could request discharge for the good of the service because charges had been preferred against him under the UCMJ which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. The applicant also understood that if his request for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026353
The applicant requests that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The applicant provides no additional evidence with his application. He completed basic training at Fort Bliss, Texas, and remained at Fort Bliss for advanced individual training (AIT).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066379C070402
On 6 November 1978, the separation authority approved the board of officers recommendation and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service for misconduct due to frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with a general discharge. In accordance with a recommendation from a board of officers, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct. The Board reviewed the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016896
On 25 February 1980, the applicant's commander informed him he was initiating separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-31 (Expeditious Discharge Program). The applicant requests to be paid for about 80 days of leave, which he asserts he accrued while on active duty and should have been paid on separation. Regarding the accrued leave for which the applicant could be paid, neither the applicant's record nor...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002830
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. On 19 October 1979, the appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request for discharge and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. At the time of his application to the Board, the applicant was incarcerated by the Maryland Department of Corrections.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064332C070421
On the same date, the Cadre Review Board determined that the applicant should be separated under the On 6 October 1983, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. Army policy states that a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a GD under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020255
The applicant requests his 1984 discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable. The applicant provides the following documents, some of which are also included in his available Official Military Personnel File (OMPF): * October 1978 Noncommissioned Officers Academy Completion Certificate * Enlisted Evaluation Report for the period ending in February 1979 * March 1979 Certificate of Achievement * 10 January 1980 Honorable Discharge Certificate * Undated Disposition...