| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Frank C. Jones, II | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to that of an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he made a bad decision that has caused him disgrace and cost him his military career and, as a result, he is being punished everyday. He states that conviction for a sexual offense prohibits him from taking advantage of many employment opportunities and denies him choices when he searches for places to live. He says that he has learned a valuable lesson that you cannot take things into your own hands. He wants his discharge upgraded so that he can have his life back, and regain his honor and self-esteem. He requests the Board take into consideration the numerous awards, badges, medals and ribbons he earned while he was on active duty.
In support of his request, the applicant submits letters from the Mayor of Fitzgerald, Georgia, an officer in the United States Navy; and a member of the Georgia Army National Guard. He also submits character reference letters from the Ben Hill County (Georgia) Sheriff, a Magistrate Judge in the Ben Hill County Office of the Magistrate, and the Vice Chairman, Ben Hill County Board of County Commissioners. All letters that the applicant provided are from individuals that have known him either for several years or for most of his life. The applicant is described as a selfless person, eager to succeed. He has strong leadership qualities and he is a diligent and dedicated worker. He supports his community by becoming involved in community projects.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
That prior to the period of enlistment under review, he served honorably in the Regular Army (RA) from 27 October 1995 - 4 April 1999.
On 5 April 1999, he reenlisted in the RA for 3 years in military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Motor Transport Operator) and in pay grade E-4.
On 4 April 2000, at Fort Stewart, Georgia, the applicant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, by a general court-martial of: failure to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed; unlawfully striking a female soldier on the head, legs and shoulder with his hand; and wrongfully communicating to a female soldier a threat that, if she screamed, he would beat her down; and willfully and wrongfully confining and carrying away a female soldier (a person not a minor) against her will; committing an indecent assault upon a person not his wife on 18 June 1999. He was sentenced to reduction from pay grade E-4 to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, to be confined for 125 days, and to be separated with a BCD.
The applicant remained in military confinement from 4 April 2000 to 16 July 2000. On 17 July 2000, he was placed on excess leave pending completion of the appellate review process.
On 5 October 2000, the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and approved the sentence. On 9 January 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied the applicant's petition for grant of review. On 16 February 2001, the appropriate authority ordered the BCD to be duly executed.
On 11 May 2001, the applicant was discharged in absentia under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, with a BCD as a result of his conviction by a general court-martial. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that he completed 5 years, 3 months, and 11 days of active military service and he had 104 days of lost time due to being in military confinement.
The applicant's DD Form 214 also shows that he was awarded the Joint Service Achievement Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Multinational Force and Observers Medal (2nd award), Sharpshooter Qualification Badge (M-16 Rifle), and the Driver and Mechanic Badge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11, provides that a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section
1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. The Board noted the applicant's military awards, but did not find them sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade in his discharge. Likewise, the Board noted the applicant's letters of support from prominent members of his local community. The Board congratulates the applicant on his conduct since he has been separated, however, this does not provide the Board a basis upon which to grant clemency.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant has established no basis for the Board to grant clemency.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rvo___ __bje___ __fcj___ DENY APPLICATION
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002081090 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (BCD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 20010511 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, Chap 3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A68.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.6800 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500454
MD05-00454 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050112. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017111
The applicant requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 28 June 2002. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020294
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 03 June 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090020294 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088587C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004359
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060004359 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) states, in pertinent part, that in any case of pretrial confinement, the commander of the person confined will provide a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013080C071029
The evidence of record confirms that after the applicant successfully completed training, he failed to show up for overseas movement to the RVN. After a thorough and comprehensive review of the applicant’s military service record, it is concluded that given his short and undistinguished record of military service, coupled with the seriousness of the offense for which he was convicted, clemency would be inappropriate in this case. In order to justify correction of a military record, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013438
The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. Further, he hopes that the life of his past will not dictate the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) and states that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge so that he can get proper medical care. After a thorough review of the available records, there was no cause for clemency and an insufficient basis upon which to base an upgrade of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010550
Applicant Name: ????? He was sentenced to be discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge, confinement for 60 days, forfeiture of $737.00 pay per month for two months, and reduction to the grade of E1. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010044
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 4 December 1998, he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. The applicants contentions have been noted; however, he has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, sufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003895
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides that the Board is not empowered to set aside a conviction. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by changing his BCD to uncharacterized and changing the reason for his separation because his crime was an isolated incident and he has an otherwise clean record.