| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast | Member | ||
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his discharge should be upgraded so that he can qualify to receive medical benefits. He also states that he entered into a pre-trial agreement with the understanding that the knife would not be brought into evidence because it came from one of the victims. One of his lawyers started to inquire about the knife but another lawyer stopped him.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Little Rock, Arkansas, on 12 October 1982, for a period of 3 years, training as an engineer track vehicle crewman and assignment to Europe. He subsequently waived that portion of his contract regarding assignment to Europe. He completed his training and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas, where he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 September 1984.
On 11 July 1985, he reenlisted for a period of 5 years, assignment to Europe and a Selective Reenlistment Bonus. He was transferred to Germany on 7 January 1986 and was assigned to an engineer company.
On 26 November 1986, he was convicted, pursuant to his pleas of guilty, by a general court-martial, of the wrongful possession of a switchblade knife with a blade in excess of three inches long, committing assault by cutting another soldier in the stomach and forearm, and for assault on another individual by inflicting grievous bodily harm in the form of a knife wound to the stomach. He was sentenced to confinement for a period of 1 year, reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a BCD.
He was transferred to the Correctional Activity at Fort Riley, Kansas, to serve his confinement, where he remained until he was placed on involuntary excess leave while awaiting his appellate review. At the time he was granted excess leave, he was informed of his rights and of the procedures to petition the United States Court of Military Appeals within 60 days after receipt of the Army Court of Military Review (ACMR) decision.
Meanwhile, on 24 March 1987, the ACMR affirmed the findings and sentence approved by the convening authority.
On 21 October 1987, he was discharged with a BCD, pursuant to a duly reviewed and affirmed court-martial conviction. He had served 4 years, 1 month and 21 days of total active service and had 288 days of lost time due to imprisonment.
Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Board is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
2. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore appear to be appropriate considering the available facts of the case.
3. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to the seriousness of his offenses.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__reb ___ ___ecp__ __ao____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003090122 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/11/13 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1987/10/21 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200/ch3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | BCD |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 675 | 144.6800/a68.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014386
The applicant requests clemency in changing his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an honorable discharge (HD). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He was not given his BCD until after his conviction and sentence had been reviewed and affirmed by the ACMR.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021297
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021297 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his case was an isolated incident and that there were no alcohol/drug treatment services available at the time of his service. Special Court-Martial Order Number 106, dated 3 August 1983, shows the convening authority approved the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008775
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060008775 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 9 November 1987, the applicant was separated from the Army with a Bad Conduct Discharge. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014659
He was convicted of the wrong crime as it relates to the assault, although he admits to being guilty of conspiracy to assault. Personnel acting as Military Police are one of these special categories by virtue of the fact that it is their job to enforce the law. The applicant contends that drugs and or alcohol were factors in the offenses; however, the record contains no documentation to support that the applicant was under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time he committed the acts.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017438C070206
The applicant requests to present his case before a formal panel of the Board. The applicant states his command did not take into consideration his nearly eight years of honorable service. Pursuant to Article 66(b), UCMJ, the record of trial was referred to the United States Army Court of Military Review (ACMR).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006025
While he was there, he received his second Army Good Conduct Medal. He was there alone with his 6-year old son. His conviction, confinement, and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007850
The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded. The case was remanded back to the ACMR, and on 31 July 1987 the ACMR set aside the finding of guilty and the sentence on the remaining court-marital charge of stealing the submachine gun and authorized a rehearing on the larceny and wrongful disposition charges. Notwithstanding counsel's contention that there were no court-martial charges pending against the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021416
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge (GD). The applicant was discharged with a BCD on 12 July 1988.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025470
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 3 February 1988, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, as a result of court-martial, with issuance of a BCD. His record shows he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002730
On 15 May 1987, the LAARNG discharged the applicant with a bad conduct discharge. Chapter 3, section IV, established policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge and provided that a Soldier would be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. However, many Soldiers enlisted at a young age,...