APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the honorable discharge he received due to his Department of the Army bar to reenlistment, reduction in force, be corrected to a medical retirement.
APPLICANT STATES: That he injured his left elbow in an accident in a printing plant. After receiving surgery on his elbow, he was told that he was to be medically boarded. Instead of being medically retired, he was administratively discharged without benefits for his injury.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military personnel and medical records show:
That he enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 December 1984 with prior active and reserve service. He was awarded the military occupational specialty of unit supply specialist and was promoted to pay grade E-5.
On 21 December 1992 the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, for his failure to go to his appointed place of duty, for two counts of being disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer, and for disobeying a lawful order. The punishment imposed consisted of a reduction to pay grade E-4.
On 10 July 1993 the applicant was notified that he had been barred from reenlistment by the Department of the Army due to three substandard noncommissioned officer evaluation reports.
Accordingly, on 9 March 1994 he was honorably discharged with $9,408.24 in separation pay.
Army Regulation 635-40 provides that the medical treatment facility commander with the primary care responsibility will evaluate those referred to him and will, if it appears as though the member is not medically qualified to perform duty or fails to meet retention criteria, refer the member to a medical evaluation board. Those members who do not meet medical retention standards will be referred to a physical evaluation board for a determination of the percentage of disability to be awarded. This regulation also provided in pertinent part that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation.
Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.
Records obtained from the VA show that the applicant has been awarded a 10 percent disability rating for cervical and lumbar paravertebral muscles strain and myositis (inflammation of a voluntary muscle).
In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Medical Advisor who stated that although the applicant had a veritable plethora of physical complaints while on active duty, each complaint was thoroughly checked out and either no problem was found or the condition was determined minor enough not to be medically disqualifying. The ARBA Medical Advisor also notes that the VA has not found the applicant to suffer from any disabilities after his discharge. The ARBA Medical Advisor concludes that the applicant has provided no proof of any medical reason for a disability retirement.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:
1. The applicant was never determined to be medically unfit and, therefore, was not referred to a medical evaluation board. Absent this referral, the applicant was not eligible for separation by reason of physical unfitness.
2. Contrary to the applicants contentions, there is no indication that he had any medical condition which rendered him unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062151C070421
When provided the same evidence submitted to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for the same time period, the VA in July 2000 determined that he receive a 40 percent rating for his left arm with an overall rating of 50 percent. It is a fact finding board to investigate the nature, cause, degree of severity, and probable permanency of the disability of soldiers who are referred to the board; to evaluate the physical condition of the soldier against the physical requirements of the soldier’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022076
The applicant requests correction of her medical evaluation board (MEB) and physical evaluation board (PEB) proceedings to show additional unfitting medical conditions and her discharge with severance pay changed to physical disability retirement. The applicant contends her MEB and PEB proceedings should be corrected to show additional unfitting medical conditions and her discharge with severance pay changed to physical disability retirement. The VA is not required to find unfitness for duty.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01955
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PEB assigned a 20% rating using code 5201 (Arm limitation of motion) for limitation and weakness of the right upper extremity s/p IED blast fracturing the humerus with an active ROM recorded at 90 degrees in its...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511257C070209
APPLICANT STATES: He was rated for classic migraine headaches. If an EPTS condition is not aggravated by military service, the finding will be not in line of duty, EPTS. If the PEB determines that an individual is physically unfit, it recommends the percentage of disability to be awarded which, in turn, determines whether an individual will be discharged with severance pay or retired.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00442
All documented modest to moderate ROM reductions, but all were in the noncompensable or minimum compensable (10%) ranges; except for a significantly disparate PT exam 6 months prior to separation noting 90 degree flexion (ratable at 20% via code 5206) and 38 degree pronation (ratable at 30% via 5213). Before addressing its rating recommendation for the biceps tendon injury at the elbow, the Board must acknowledge that there is clear evidence that the CI suffered a right shoulder injury...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00036
Right Shoulder Condition . The treatment of this muscle wound, including immobilization, was adjudged to have led to the CI’s primary unfitting conditions of “Right Shoulder Flexion Contracture and Adhesive Capsulitis.” The treatment record and NARSUM detail there was generalized disability to the right upper extremity beyond the shoulder joint and “right shoulder flexion contracture.” The Commander’s statement specifically mentions the right elbow: “physically incapable of reasonably...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00492
The pain rating was mild with occasional moderate pain.At the MEB examination dated 12 April 2004, the CI reported numbness of the left hand and elbow with pins and a staple in the left wrist, while the MEB medical exam (DD Form 2808) on 20 April 2004 noted a scar on the left elbow.A permanent U3 profile was issued on 15 April 2004 for the ulnar nerve transposition with limitations of no push-ups, carrying more than 30 pounds, or constructing an individual fighting position.At the VA...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01514
The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition.The informal PEB adjudicated “s/p removal of shrapnel from left hip” as unfitting and rated 10%, citing criteria of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 andVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining condition was determined to be CAT III.The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB), which made the following changes “s/p removal of shrapnel form left hip and shrapnel to both elbows” as...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00154
Unfitting ConditionsCodeRatingDateConditionCodeRatingExamEffectiveResiduals of a Left Elbow Injury500310%Residual, Left Elbow Comminuted Avulsion Fracture of the Olecranon with Degenerative Arthritis (Claimed as Left Elbow and Left Arm Conditions)5003-520550%2007040320070124Left elbow degenerative joint disease (PEB)FIT---Ulnar Nerve Neuropathy With Chronic Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy, Left Elbow (Claimed as Left Hand Condition, 4th and 5th Digits) Associated with Residual, Left Elbow...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01480
The contended condition adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB was the fracture of the left humerus. In the matter of the right elbow condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5207 IAW VASRD §4.71a, and a separate 10% rating for weakness due to muscle injury coded 5305 IAW VASRD §4.73. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING...