Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01514
Original file (PD-2013-01514.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-01514    
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS          BOARD DATE: 20150429
SEPARATION DATE: 20041215

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Combat Engineer) medically separated for status post (s/p) removal of shrapnel from left hip and shrapnel to both elbows. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty [LIMDU] and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The s/p removal of shrapnel from left hip and shrapnel to both elbows conditions, characterized as “s/p removal of shrapnel from left hip” and “shrapnel to both elbows,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition. The informal PEB adjudicated “s/p removal of shrapnel from left hip” as unfitting and rated 10%, citing criteria of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining condition was determined to be CAT III. The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB), which made the following changes “s/p removal of shrapnel form left hip and shrapnel to both elbows” as unfitting, rated 10% and 10% for a combined rating of 20%. The remaining conditions were determined to be CAT III, status post colostomy with reversal, CAT IV, adjustment disorder, resolved.


CI CONTENTION: “Multiple gunshot wounds and shrapnel wounds, my original IPEB board miss rated my wounds. Both elbows were rated together.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.







RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20041008 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
S/P Removal of Shrapnel from Left Hip 5299-5003 10% S/P Shrapnel Wound, Left Hip, with Retained Foreign Bodies 5316 10% 20041028
Shrapnel from Both Elbows 5299-5003 10% S/P Shrapnel Wound, Left Elbow, with Retained Foreign Bodies 5305 10% 20041028
S/P Shrapnel Wound, Right Elbow, with Retained Foreign Bodies 5305 10% 20041028
Other x 2 (Not in Scope) Other X 15
Combined: 20% Combined: 80%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41221 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges that the original VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination was referenced, but not available in the evidence before it. The missing evidence will be referenced below in relevant context; and, it is not suspected that the missing evidence would significantly alter the Board’s recommendations.

Left Hip Condition. While deployed on 26 March 2003, the CI received a high velocity gunshot wound (GSW) to the gluteal and abdominal regions with associated shrapnel injuries to the left hip. X-rays revealed a large shrapnel fragment lodged within the femoral neck as well as a small fracture of the superior greater trochanter (a small portion of the top of the femur bone). He was evacuated from theater and underwent several surgeries for other life-threatening conditions in the immediate post-incident timeframe. On 28 January 2004, the CI underwent surgery to remove shrapnel from his left hip as well as excision of a greater trochanteric “non-union” fracture. Post-operatively, he did very well whereby within 6 weeks the CI self-reported being “tremendously better than [he] was preoperatively.” Repeat X-rays were free of shrapnel fragments. Orthopedic follow-up on 16 June 2004 (6 months post-operatively and 6 months pre-Service separation), revealed a normal gait and mildly decreased ROM of the left hip. A Trendelenburg sign was present (indicating weak hip abductors to include the buttock muscles). His diagnosis remained left hip shrapnel; s/p removal with mild weakness. The commander’s letter implicated a direct relationship of the CI’s multiple medical conditions to his inability to perform his military duties

At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) (22 April 2004; 8 months pre-separation) the CI reported having the ability to ride the exercise bicycle, jog on the elliptical trainer, and perform swimming. The physical examination (PE) revealed “good” ROM without pain or crepitus. Motor and sensation was intact and he ambulated with a non-antalgic gait. His diagnosis remained unchanged. Although absent the original pre-discharge VA C&P examination of 28 October 2004 (6 weeks pre-separation), a subsequent VARD indicated 10% impairment rating was adjudicated for “moderate muscle disability” in reference to the left hip condition. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.









“

Left Hip (Thigh) ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 8 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20040422)
Ortho ~ 6 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20040616)
VA C&P ~6 weeks Pre-Sep
(20041028)
Flexion (125 Normal)Good” ROM” 100 “There was no painful or limited motion of your left hip.”
Extension (20) -
External Rotation (45) 45
Abduction (0-45) 30
Adduction (45) -
Comment no Trendelenburg sign weakness
(tredelenburg sign +)
-
§4.71a Rating NR 10%-20% 0%

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Board members first reviewed the PEB’s coding/rating determination in this case. While the analogous diagnostic code of 5003 (degenerative arthritis) is medically reasonable, the Board considered other physical-based residuals that may be of greater significance near the time of service separation. The VA rated 10% under the physically-based muscle code of 5316 ( Group XVI; flexion of the hip) at “ moderate ” impairment. Board m embers also considered examination probative value (PV) between the three charted encounters listed above and determined that both the MEB and the transcribed VA exam findings were not to the level of detail as compared to the Ortho pedic follow-up at 6 months pre-separation and therefore, a greater degree of PV was assigned to that exam ination .

The action officer explained that the Trendelenburg sign (associated with the probative exam), strictly tests for weakness in the abductor muscles of the hip, pelvis, and thigh, and a positive test with noted weakness was adequately described by orthopedics. Given such pathology coupled with positive physical findings, Board members agreed that the VA’s approach in rating under a VASRD muscle code was appropriate. The Board agreed that the level of musculoskeletal impairment in this case was below “moderately severe” and more appropriately described as “moderate” at 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB’s rating level adjudication for the left hip condition, but did recommend a coding change to 5216 (VA’s code).

Bilateral Elbow Condition. Pursuant to the same firefight incident while deployed, the CI also received a GSW to the right elbow and shrapnel injury in the left elbow. There was no comment regarding separate exit wounds. X-rays revealed approximately 50% of the olecranon process (tip of the ulna bone forming the “point” of the elbow) was absent. He underwent initial surgical debridement of the right elbow and a second procedure one year later to remove small bone fragments. A post-separation VA encounter dated 11 April 2005 indicated a shrapnel wound over the lateral aspect of the left arm; X-rays revealed metal near the distal left humerus. There was full ROM of the elbow.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a single 10% rating under 5003 code (degenerative arthritis), whereas the VA separately rated the left and right elbows under VASRD muscle code 5305 (Group V; elbow supination) at 10% each citing retention of small metallic fragments. The Board first considered whether each elbow condition remained separately unfitting, having decoupled them from the combined PEB adjudication. Board members considered the objective and abnormal finding of retained metal near the left elbow and raised the question of whether the left elbow was reasonably justified as separately unfitting near the time of Service separation. The well-established principle for fitness determinations is that they are performance-based. Although the recorded evidence overwhelmingly reflected that the right elbow was associated with more symptomatology, pathology and impairment than the left elbow, Board members considered and agreed that the resultant persistent pain from either elbow would have logically been associated with significant disability and therefore, recommends separate impairment ratings. After due deliberation, Board members agreed that the VA’s choice of muscle code 5305 was appropriate and recommends a 10% impairment rating for each elbow for a combined 20%.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD and or DoDI 1332.39 were exercised. In the matter of the left hip condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB rating adjudication, but does recommend a change in VASRD coding from 5299-5003 to 5316. In the matter of the bilateral elbow condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right elbow and 10% for the left elbow coded 5305 IAW VASRD §4.73. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left Hip Condition 5316 10%
Shrapnel; Right Elbow Condition 5305 10%
Shrapnel; Left Elbow Condition 5305 10%
COMBINED
(w/ BLF)		 30%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130915, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record







                           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review








MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

 DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref:     (a) DoDI 6040.44
 (b) PDBR ltr dtd 1 Jul 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(c) PDBR ltr dtd 15 Jun 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(d) PDBR ltr dtd 12 Jun 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (e).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a.       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 30 percent disability rating (increased from 20 percent) effective date of discharge.
b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 70 percent disability rating (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a 20 percent disability rating (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.


3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are complete.



 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00036

    Original file (PD2009-00036.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Shoulder Condition . The treatment of this muscle wound, including immobilization, was adjudged to have led to the CI’s primary unfitting conditions of “Right Shoulder Flexion Contracture and Adhesive Capsulitis.” The treatment record and NARSUM detail there was generalized disability to the right upper extremity beyond the shoulder joint and “right shoulder flexion contracture.” The Commander’s statement specifically mentions the right elbow: “physically incapable of reasonably...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01480

    Original file (PD-2012-01480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The contended condition adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB was the fracture of the left humerus. In the matter of the right elbow condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5207 IAW VASRD §4.71a, and a separate 10% rating for weakness due to muscle injury coded 5305 IAW VASRD §4.73. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00755

    Original file (PD2012-00755.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Pain Left Hip Condition. 3 PD1200755 RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE RATING 5003 COMBINED 10% 10% Chronic Pain Left Hip UNFITTING CONDITION The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120605, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00544

    Original file (PD-2014-00544.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Groin and Hip Pain50030%Degenerative Joint Disease of the Left Hip(Claimed as Left Hip Injury)500310%20050628Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 17 RATING: 0%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050713(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Left Hip (Thigh) ROM (Degrees)MEB 4 Mo. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00721

    Original file (PD-2014-00721.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner’s diagnoses were due to shrapnel blast injuries: permanent sciatic nerve damage left leg (peroneal and tibial nerves) with right foot and ankle complete weakness; shrapnel injuries to bilateral knees; right ankle anterior tibialis tendon subluxation and ankle instability; and, shrapnel wounds to both lower extremities. The VA rated the left sciatic neuropathy together with “ left knee pain from shrapnel” and “left ankle pain from shrapnel/tendon sublux” with code 8520 at 60%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01204

    Original file (PD-2013-01204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record contains well documented evidence of significant left thigh muscle injury with an open, comminuted femur fracture that required ORIF and subsequent bone grafting. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01887

    Original file (PD-2013-01887.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The thigh condition, characterized as “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound,” were the only two conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound to left thigh” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, respectively,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00172

    Original file (PD2012-00172.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic low back pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. 5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar: The Board considered the PEB’s rating under the 5295 code of the 2003 VASRD.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00145

    Original file (PD2012-00145.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Marked lack of endurance and mild lack of coordination with marked restriction of repetitive use of the left elbow and hand.” 10% (VA rated 20%) 10% (VA rated 20%) 10% (VA rated 20%) 10% (VA rated 30%) The PEB applied a 20% for left elbow pain coded as 5099-5003-8616. The PEB combined elbow pain, ulnar radiculopathy, and traumatic arthritis as a single unfitting condition, coded analogously to 5003 and 8616 and rated 20%. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02717

    Original file (PD-2013-02717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DATE OF PLACEMENT ONTO TDRL: 20030523DATE OF REMOVAL FROM TDRL: 20070301 The “avascular necrosis of the bilateral femur heads, left greater than right” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated his bilateral hip conditions as unfitting, rated 20% left and 10% right, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). It then considered the right hip and left hip...