Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01817
Original file (PD-2013-01817.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01817
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140710
SEPARATION DATE: 20040917


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (15B/Turbine Engine Repair Technician) medically separated for chronic bilateral plantar fasciitis and equinus deformity of feet. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity bilaterally conditions, characterized as “fails to meet retention” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic bilateral plantar fasciitis and equinus deformity as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in her application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity bilaterally conditions are addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040524
 VA - (1 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis, and Equinus Deformity 5399-5310 0% Pes Planus, Equinus Deformity, Achilles and Plantar Spur, S/P Plantar Fascial Release Due To Plantar Fasciitis Involving Right Foot 5299-5284 20% 20040809
Pes Planus, Equinus Deformity, Achilles and Plantar Spur, S/P Plantar Fascial Release Due To Plantar Fasciitis Involving Right Foot 5299-5284 20% 20040809
No Other Items in Scope
 Other x 1 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50110 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY invalid font number 31502 : invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
Chronic Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis and Equinus Deformity . The PEB combined the unfitting bilateral plantar fasciitis condition for single rating. The approach by the PEB reflected its judgment that the constellation of conditions was unfitting, and there was no need for separate fitness adjudications or implied adjudication that each condition was separately unfitting. The Board’s initial charge was to determine if the PEB’s approach of combining conditions under a single rating was justified in lieu of separate ratings. When considering a separate rating for each condition, the Board considers each bundled condition to be reasonably justified as separately unfitting unless a preponderance of evidence indicates the condition would not cause the member to be referred into the Disability Evaluation System or be found unfit because of physical disability. When the Board recommends separate fitness recommendations in this circumstance, its recommendations may not produce a lower combined rating than that of the PEB.
According to the podiatry MEB consultation , the CI experienced the onset of foot pain in June 2002, 4 months after entry into military service. A service treatment record dated 27 June 2002 documents care for left foot pain of 2 weeks duration. She passed the physical fitness test two mile run (83 points out of a maximum of 100) on 1 August 2002. A 6 September 2002 clinic entry noted left heel pain for 2 months that was improving. After arrival to her new duty station in November 2002, she sought care for bilateral foot pain diagnosed as plantar fasciitis (inflammation of thick plantar fascia on bottom of foot that connects the heel to toes and creates the arch often associated strenuous training such as running) . She underwent left foot plantar fascial release surgery in March 2003 (endoscopic; a minimally invasive surgical treatment) . She passed the alternate fitness test walk in 26 August 2003 (72 points out of a maximum of 100 points). A podiatry clinic note on 4 September 2003 recorded there was marked improvement in the left foot pain. A 16 September 2003 podiatry record entry notes following the left foot surgery there was “successful resolution of her symptoms . ” T he same procedure was performed for the right foot 16 September 2003. Post-operative notes on 19   September and 2 October indicated satisfactory healing. The 1 December 2003 aviation clinic encounter recorded complaint of persisting left greater than right foot pain. The CI reported that walking was slow but tolerable for short distances . Her right foot was still in a “cam walker” post-operative. The physician initiated an MEB due to the fact that duty limitations had been in place for more than one year. The 10 December 2003 c ommander’s s tatemen t indicated that in her degraded physical condition, the CI was unable to perform the duties of her MOS and should be evaluated for reclassification or separation. At the 18   February 2004 MEB consultation by podiatry, the CI complained of persistent painful heels, in spite of conservative n onsurgical measures and bilateral plantar fascial releases. The CI complained of a continued burning and throbbing sensation to the plantar heels and bottom s of her feet. The pain occurred with pr olonged standing and at night. On examination t here was t enderness to palpation along the bilateral plantar fascia . The feet and ankles showed no edema, ecchymosis or open lesions. Ankle dorsiflexion was 0 degrees bilaterally due to tight Achilles tendons (heel cord s ). The diagnoses were listed as chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity ( lack of dorsiflexion at the ankle due to tightness of the Achilles tendon ) bilaterally. Podiatry concluded that the CI’s podiatric condition failed to meet retention criteria and recommended that she should be referred to the PEB for further disposition.

In the 11 Ma rch 2004 MEB narrative summary examination t he CI complained of continued pain in the plantar aspects of both feet . She denied significant relief from surgical procedures and conservative management . The CI reported modest pain relief with rest, elevation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( NSAIDs ) and an anti-convulsant drug used for neuropathic pain . She complained of constant, sharp, throbbing , burning, 4-5/10 pain with exacerbations to 8-9/10 with activity (running, jumping, marching, prolonged standing, weight bearing). Physical examination findings were documented from the 18 February 2004 MEB consultation by podiatry. On 29 April 2004 , the CI was placed on an L3 permanent profile. The 4   May 2004 MEB referred chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis and equinus deformity bilaterally as not meeting retention standards.

At the 9 August 2004 VA C ompensation and P ension (C&P) examination , a month prior to separation, the CI reported the onset of plantar fascia di scomfort in June 2002 that persisted despite treatment. The CI indicated that she was able to stand for 4-6 hours using over the counter orthopedic shoe/appliance ( Z-coil pain relief footwear ) . The CI reported she was only able to stand for about an hour without Z-coil shoes and was no longer able to run or participate in sports. She indicated that the pain was controlled with NSAIDs and an anti-convulsant drug used for neuropathic pain. Physical examination showed a slow, cautious, abnormal, g ait reflecting significant discomfort. There was evidence of pes planus with no arch present when the patient stood . There was no foot edema or instability of the ankles. Ankle range - of - motion (ROM) was normal bilaterally with dorsiflexion of 20 degrees and plantar flexion of 45 degrees. ROM was not limited by pain, fatigue, weakness or lack of endurance. There were well-healed 1 cm scars in the medial arches at the base of the heels. There was diffuse tenderness to palpation in the medial plantar fascia and over the heels. The V A C&P examination listed the diagnoses of b ilateral plantar fasciitis, bilateral equinus deformity and bilateral calcaneal spur docu m ented by X -rays.

The Board first considered whether each the right and left foot condition were separately unfitting when considered alone. Following initiation of the MEB process, the bilateral foot complaints were treated equally and concurrently. Little distinction was documented between the bilateral feet by the CI or examiners. Both feet were treated with surgical plantar fascial releases and the CI reported equal limitations preventing performance of prolonged walking, standing and running. The Board majority concluded that the constellation of findings from the service medical records, radiographic reports and commander’s statement found the CI’s right and left foot co nditions separately unfitting.

The Board direct s attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated chronic bilateral plantar fasciitis and equinus deformity of feet 0% (coded 5399-5310 ; analogously to muscle G roup X, foot muscles ). The VA rated the pes planus, equinus deformity, A chilles and plantar spur, status post plantar fascial release due to plantar fasciitis involving left foot 20% and right foot 20% , moderately severe (coded 5299-5284 ; analogously to foot injuries, other) based on the C&P examination. The proximate examinations (MEB and C&P) documented chronic bilateral foot pain, exacerbated by prolonged weight bearing and activity. The CI reported bilateral foot pain impacted her ability to exercise or participating in sports and recreation. The C&P examination documented an abnormal gait, pes planus and tenderness to palpation of the plantar fascia. There was no foot edema or instability of the ankles. Bilateral ankle ROM was normal and not limited by pain, fatigue, weakness, or lack of endurance. There is no specific diagnostic code for plantar fasciitis. The VASRD diagnostic codes used by the PEB and the VA rate similarly based on an assessment of impairment as slight (0%), moderate (10%), moderately severe (20%) and severe (30%). All Board members agreed the limitations described and examination findings did not exceed a moderate level and discussed whether the condition more nearly approximated the slight or moderate. Members concluded the abnormal gait on the C&P examination favored the moderate over the slight impairment. Members noted the VA rating for moderately severe, but agreed the condition did not more nearly approach this level than the moderate. The Board also considered VA diagnostic code 5276 for acquired flatfoot. All members agreed the condition did not exceed the moderate level (10%, unilateral or bilateral). Under this code, mild (0%) indicates symptoms are relieved with orthotics. The Board noted the CI’s symptoms were improved with orthotics but the impairment was better described by the moderate level under this code. The 20% rating under 5276 would require severe unilateral disability with evidence of marked deformity, accentuated pain on manipulation and use, swelling on use, or characteristic callosities. The Board then discussed whether a single 10% rating for the bilateral foot condition under 5276 was more appropriate than a 10% rating for each foot under 5284 (foot injuries other) or 5310 (muscle group 10). The Board concluded the overall disability picture supported a separate 10% rating for each foot. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two ratings), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic plantar fasciitis and equinus deformity involving left foot condition and 10% for the chronic plantar fasciitis and equinus deformity involving right foot condition (VA code 5299-5284).


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the chronic bilateral plantar fasciitis and equinus deformity condition, the Board , by a vote of 2:1, recommends separately unfitting disability rating s of 10 % for the right foot and 10% for the left foot coded 5 2 99-5 284 IAW VASRD §4.71a. The single voter for dissent did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Left Plantar Fasciitis, and Equinus Deformity 5299-5284 10%
Chronic Right Plantar Fasciitis, and Equinus Deformity 5299-5284 10%
COMBINED (w/ BLF) 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131009, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150002630 (PD201301817)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02563

    Original file (PD-2013-02563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Foot/Lower ExtremityCondition (Heel Spur, Plantar Fasciitis, Hammer Toe,Achilles and Gastroc-Soleus Tendinitis) .The service treatment record (STR) contains a routine exam entry from 1997 (same year as enlistment) documenting hallux valgus (bunion deformity of the big toe); and, a clinic note from the same year noting a 4-month history of bilateral foot pain. The PEB rated the right foot condition analogously under 5279 (metatarsalgia) which provides for a maximum rating of 10%, under...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00900

    Original file (PD-2012-00900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic bilateral plantar fasciitis as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The ankle condition will be considered by the Board as it relates to the unfitting bilateral plantar fasciitis condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00045

    Original file (PD2010-00045.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered rating the left ankle degeneration separately, but determined the rear-foot pain was best considered as degenerative changes of the left rear foot which also contributed to the limitation of ankle motion from the plantar fasciitis. The Board recommends no additional separately unfitting foot or ankle condition, or change in the PEB adjudications other than PF, and all symptoms were considered under the separate 5399-5310 coding ratings above. Exhibit C. Department of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00537

    Original file (PD 2012 00537.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEBadjudicated “chronic pain, both heels, due to bone spurs and Achilles tendonitis”as unfitting, rated at 10%,citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The PEB rated the bilateral Achilles tendonitis, heel spurs, and chronic heel painat 10% (Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities [VASRD] code 5003; degenerative arthritis) citing slight/frequent pain IAW USAPDA pain policy. The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00031

    Original file (PD2012-00031.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Bilateral Foot/Ankle Condition . The MEB physical exam demonstrated; a slow gait, bilateral tenderness of the ankles, increased pain along the posterior region of the left ankle, negative medial and lateral pain of the right ankle, bilateral tenderness over the plantar fascia and also on the area of the medial heads of the calcaneus (heel bone), bilateral pes planus (flat foot), a scar on the left big toe, without erythema, edema or instability of the ankles. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02782

    Original file (PD-2013-02782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis, Left Greater Than Right5399-531010%Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis5299-527610%200708175399-53100%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01598

    Original file (PD2012 01598.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lumbago and positive TB skin test conditions, identified in the rating chart below, were also identified and forwarded by the MEB as meeting retention standards.The PEB adjudicated the bilateral plantar fasciitis condition as unfitting, rated 10% for the right foot and 10% for the left foot for a combined rating of 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals, and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00599

    Original file (PD2011-00599.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. The PEB adjudicated the foot condition as chronic foot pain secondary to stress fractures and plantar fasciitis under code 5279 metatarsalgia at 10 % disability rating, the only rating under this code.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00694

    Original file (PD2013 00694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI had a long history of bilateral foot pain finally diagnosed as chronic bilateral fasciitis in 2001. The NARSUM and the C&P exam contain language that the CI was functional but had pain in both feet only with prolonged activity. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01101

    Original file (PD2011-01101.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An additional combined condition, “secondary low back and bilateral knee pain” was forwarded as “not boardable.” The PEB (via an Informal Reconsideration following an appeal) conceded aggravation of the congenital podiatric conditions; and, consolidated three of the MEB submitted conditions (as specified in the PEB’s DA Form 199 language quoted below) as a single unfitting condition characterized as “Painful feet on [sic] ankles due to plantar fasciitis and posterior tibial tendonitis with...