Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03671
Original file (PD-2014-03671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-03671
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150206
SEPARATION DATE: 20080822


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Infantryman) medically separated for a right thigh muscle injury. The muscle injury could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The muscle condition, characterized as “chronic right thigh pain with a history of recurrent right quad strain,” was forwarded as the sole condition to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “muscle group injury, Group XIV” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080625
 VA (9 Mo. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Muscle Injury, Group XIV 5314 10% Right Leg Condition 5314 NSC 20090514
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 13
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 50%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090820 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]).





ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Muscle Condition. The earliest entry in the available service treatment record (STR) is from January 2005, reflecting a suspected right quadriceps strain injury following a road march. There are STR entries over ensuing months documenting pain, limited range-of-motion (ROM), and antalgic gait; which improved over time. Magnetic resonance imaging performed in April 2005 noted significant strain injury to quadriceps muscles, but no indication of a muscle tear. An orthopedic consultant the following month recommended continuing physical therapy (PT) and activity restriction. There are no entries in the available STR referable to right thigh complaints for the ensuing 3 years. There is a PT entry from November 2007 (9 months prior to separation) which documents a re-injury of the right quadriceps. It records 4/5 quadriceps strength, notes that the CI was able to perform 20 straight leg raises, and contains the entry “tenderness to palpation mid-quad muscle belly; area of hardness – probable scar tissue.” There are follow-up PT notes repeating these findings, with an entry from February 2008 stating, “Believes thigh pain is worsening. Unit is pressuring him to resolve issue.” There are no other probative STR entries preceding the narrative summary (NARSUM) by orthopedics.

The NARSUM was conducted on 7 June 2008 and notes baseline right thigh pain rated 4/10; with exacerbations to 8-9/10 by “running, jumping, marching, walking up stairs” and load bearing. The NARSUM physical exam recorded a “non-antalgic [normal] gait ... 5/5 muscle strength ... no swelling ... mild tenderness ... no area of hardness or indurations.”

A VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination was conducted on 11 May 2009, 9 months after separation, and conveyed an impression that the muscle condition was fully resolved. The VA examiner stated, “The patient states that he is currently doing fine. The patient complains of no pain or function deficits due to this traumatic event. No effect on daily activities or occupation. The average pain is 0/10.” The VA physical exam documented normal gait, 5/5 strength at the thigh and knee, no muscle atrophy or defects, full painless ROM, and no “pain, weakness, incoordination, fatigability, lack of endurance” with repetitive motion.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. All members agreed that the PEB assigned 5314 (Group XIV) is the appropriate (anatomically accurate) muscle code for rating the disability in this case. The PEB’s 10% rating was for “moderate” muscle disability under that code, which also confers a 30% rating for “moderately severe” and 40% for “severe” muscle impairment. The VA’s rationale for denial of the condition was premised on the normal C&P findings, stating “no permanent residual or chronic disability ... demonstrated by evidence following service.” Members turned to deliberation of whether a higher rating under 5314 could be reasonably recommended. VASRD §4.56 (evaluation of muscle disabilities) defines the cardinal signs and symptoms of muscle disability as “loss of power, weakness, lowered threshold of fatigue, fatigue-pain, impairment of coordination and uncertainty of movement.” A moderate rating (PEB determination) is for “record of consistent complaint of one or more of the cardinal signs and symptoms of muscle disability ... particularly lowered threshold of fatigue after average use.” The rating for moderately severe disability requires “record of consistent complaint of cardinal signs and symptoms of muscle disability ... and, if present, evidence of inability to keep up with work requirements.” All members agreed that the criteria for a severe rating under §4.56 were not reasonably satisfied in this case. With regard to the cardinal signs, the NARSUM and STR evidence provides support for fatigue-pain, but no others. The 30% language for cardinal signs (plural) is thus not satisfied; and, the 30% requirement for “inability to keep up with work requirements” appeared to be applicable to more rigorous soldiering requirements, but not for routine occupational demands (as strongly supported by the VA evidence). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board therefore concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the right quadriceps muscle condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right gastrocnemius muscle condition and IAW VASRD §4.46, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140731, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150011219 (PD201403671)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00552

    Original file (PD 2012 00552.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Pain Residuals, Fascial Release, Right Lower Leg 5099- 5003 0% S/P Fasciotomy, Right Lower Extremity 5314 10% 20061120 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries S/P Fasciotomy, Left Lower Extremity 5314 10% 20061120 Combined: 0% Combined: 20% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070116(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). In the matter of the right leg condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00502

    Original file (PD2011-00502.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the GSW to the right thigh condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The VA rated this exam as 5314 at 30%. The crucial difference in rating was the selection of disability codes; the military coded the CI’s thigh GSW based on a knee ROM disability code of 5261 for non-compensable decreased knee extension; however, the VA rated the CI under disability code 5314 for muscle injury.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01204

    Original file (PD-2013-01204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record contains well documented evidence of significant left thigh muscle injury with an open, comminuted femur fracture that required ORIF and subsequent bone grafting. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01359

    Original file (PD2012 01359.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The condition, characterized as “bilateral exertional compartment syndrome”, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Furthermore, VASRD §4.55 (principles of combined ratings for muscle injuries)stipulates that “each muscle group injury shall be separately rated.” Therefore, a combined bilateral rating is not countenanced by the VASRD in this case, regardless of any speculative argument that neither extremity was separately unfitting. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00149

    Original file (PD2009-00149.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Using an evaluation done three months after separation from the Marines, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability at a combined 30% with 5308 Left hand repair at 20% and 5024-5215 left wrist volar and dorsal blast defects at 10%. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board used the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD) as the most favorable basis for rating. The Group VII injury is characterized as moderately severe IAW with VASRD paragraph 4.56 because...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02563

    Original file (PD-2013-02563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Foot/Lower ExtremityCondition (Heel Spur, Plantar Fasciitis, Hammer Toe,Achilles and Gastroc-Soleus Tendinitis) .The service treatment record (STR) contains a routine exam entry from 1997 (same year as enlistment) documenting hallux valgus (bunion deformity of the big toe); and, a clinic note from the same year noting a 4-month history of bilateral foot pain. The PEB rated the right foot condition analogously under 5279 (metatarsalgia) which provides for a maximum rating of 10%, under...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00735

    Original file (PD2010-00735.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA exam, one month prior to separation noted residual scar symptoms of the left hand to include itching and burning. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01887

    Original file (PD-2013-01887.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The thigh condition, characterized as “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound,” were the only two conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound to left thigh” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, respectively,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01057

    Original file (PD2012 01057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service PEB – Dated 20010926VA (<1 MonthPost-Separation) – All Effective Date 20011116ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Pathologic T2ANXMO G-3, Stage II, Liposarcoma (Myxoid) of the Medial Thigh with Residual Weakness of Thigh Muscles5012-8526-531410%Right Leg Liposarcoma7899-781810%20011019↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓Residuals, Right Knee Strain5299-526210%20011019Not Service-Connected x 2 Combined: 10%Combined: 20% ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board’s authority, as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01798

    Original file (PD-2013-01798.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The General Surgeon noted the shrapnel wounds were healing well and a Physical Medicine Specialist documented right anterolateral thigh numbness, sharp pain, and weakness. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...