Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01796
Original file (PD-2014-01796.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX        CASE: PD -20 1 4 - 0 1796
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0130
Separation Date: 20050802


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (AEGIS Console Operator) medically separated for left ankle complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) status post (s/p) left ankle sprain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The left ankle CRPS s/p left ankle sprain condition(s), characterized as “pain in joint, ankle and foot” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “left ankle CRPS s/p left ankle sprain” as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :
Service IPEB – Dated 20050510
 VA - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Ankle CRPS s/p Left Ankle Sprain 8799-8720 10% Left Ankle Strain with Complex Pain Syndrome 5271 20% 20050610
Other x0
 Other x1 20050610
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20051212 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])




ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Left Ankle CRPS S/P Left Ankle Sprain Condition . The CI was a passenger on a bus that was involved in a motor vehicle crash and she sustained multiple contusions which included a left ankle injury. The CI was evaluated by Orthopedics for leg contusions. The examiner documented a normal ankle X -ray series ; and physical exam findings of left ankle edema, ten derness to palpation (TTP) and decreased sensation to light touch. The examiner diagnosed left ankle sprain and prescribed a left ankle splint. A week later, the O rthopedist noted left ankle diffuse bruising and ordered a walking boot for 4 weeks, p hysical t herapy (PT) and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug . The Orthopedist noted throbbing left ankle pain , worse at night ; and pain with walking . There were physical findings of mild left ankle edema, hypersensitivity of the lateral left ankle, mild redness of the dorsal foot a nd peroneal muscle weakness of 4/5. The examiner ordered supervised PT, a lace up ankle brace and LIMDU. The PT noted nightly sharp throbbing foot pain rated 8/10, with poor balance on the left foot limited from 5 to 10 seconds. The examiner diagnosed left ankle sprain with mild, early reflex sympathetic dystrophy ( now known as CRPS). There were physical exam findings of TTP of the anterior and lateral areas, mild edema and dyse s t h esia with light touch. A Pain Management Specialist documented non - radiating left ankle pain at 7/10 , with a sharp hyperesthestic quality , which also caused disturbed sleep, and was dependent on positioning and standing. The physical findings were TTP, and hyper esthesia to lateral ankle . The examiner did not order nerve blocks. The physical therapist noted that the CI had pain throughout the day and that prolonged standing for more than 10 minutes , running and squatting aggravated the left ankle pain. There were physical exam findings of mildly unstable left foot proprioception and that light touch and palpation caused increased sensitivity and pain. The Orthopedic exam , approximately 6 months prior to separation , showed no improvement in left ankle symptoms. The Orthopedic physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 4 months prior to separation documented persistent left ankle pain which failed to improve with PT, an inability to run, climb ladders without significant difficulty or stand for prolonged periods of time. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam , approximately a month prior to separation , documented that the CI continued to have left ankle pain on an intermittent basis with weakness, stiffness and swelling, redness and instability. She would have weekly left ankle flares which would last for 1 -to- 2 days and were precipitated by prolonged standing. During these flares, the CI would have decreased range-of-motion ( ROM ) and decreased function. She would wear a brace when in pain. The VA C&P physical exam findings are also summarized below .
There were three ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
Left Ankle ROM (Degrees)
 Ortho ~ 7 Mos. Pre-Sep MEB ~4 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~2 Mos. Pre-Sep
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal)
 15 15 10
Plantar Flexion (45)
 45 45 45
Comment
 No skin changes; Pos. h yperesthesia; poor balance; No atrophy Pos. h yperesthe sia; Normal pulses; Decreased strength calf muscle, otherwise normal; No skin changes Normal gait; Pos. Laxity; No swelling or tenderness
§4.124a/ §4.71a Rating
 20% 20% (PEB10%) 20% (VA 20%)
invalid font number 31502
The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the left ankle CRPS s / p left ankle sprain condition as 8799 analogous to 8720 ( Neuralgia ) , and rated at 10% consistent with mild. The VA coded the left ankle strain with complex pain syndrome condition as 5271 ( limitation of a nkle motion ) and rated at 20% , consistent with m arked. The Board reviewed the VA’s 20% rating based on limitation of ankle ROM and members agreed that based on the CI’s normal gait, full plantar flexion and 50% loss of ankle dorsiflexion, the 5271 based rating is more consistent with the moderate, 10% rating. All evidence is consistent with the diagnosis of CRPS which is appropriately rated under the peripheral nerve VASRD codes based on the nerve involved. The area of the lateral left foot and ankle was primarily involved with the main disability being abnormal sensation, with minimal to no decrease in strength, which is best attributed to the e xternal popliteal nerve (common peroneal) nerve. The Board reviewed the tenants of VASRD §4124a ( Neuralgia, cranial or peripheral, characterized usually by a dull and intermittent pain, of typical distribution so as to identify the nerve, is to be rated on the same scale, with a maximum equal to moderate incomplete paralysis ) . The Board members agree that the degree of hyperesthesia , pain, and poor balance was most consistent with the moderate 20% rating, the maximum available under VASRD rating guidelines. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD§4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two evaluations) , the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the left ankle CRPS s / p left ankle sprain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left ankle CRPS s / p left ankle sprain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20 %, coded 5271 -8721 IAW VASRD §4.71a and §4.124a, respectively. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Left Ankle CRPS s / p Left Ankle Sprain 5271- 872 1 2 0%
COMBINED
 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 140421 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record









                           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD P hysical Disability Board of Review


MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoD I 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr dtd 1 Jun 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(c) PDBR ltr dtd 1 Jun 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(d) PDBR ltr dtd 8 Jun 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(e) PDBR ltr dtd 19 May 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a} I approve the recommendations of the Physical
Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (d).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to
reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX former USN: Entitlement to disability
severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent (increased from 0 (zero)
percent) effective date of discharge.

b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Entitlement to disability
severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10
percent) effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Entitlement to disability
severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 0 (zero)
percent) effective date of discharge.

d. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Placement on the Permanent
Disability Retired List with a 50 percent disability rating (increased from
20 percent) effective date of discharge.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these
decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if
warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are
completed.



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01985

    Original file (PD-2014-01985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the VASRD rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation thoracic and lumbar spine conditions coded IAW §4.71a are provided a single disability rating and thus the thoracic DDD and the lumbago (listed by the PEB as separate conditions) are subsumed in the §4.71a rating that follows. Since the disability due only to the left foot cannot be isolated by the clinical evidence or from the fitness implications of the bilateral condition, the Board consensus was that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00637

    Original file (PD2012 00637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded “Ganglion Cyst, Right Foot and Ankle,Status Post(S/P) Excision” and “Painful Keloid, Right Foot and Ankle” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The PEBadjudicated “Right Ankle Pain Secondary to a Hypertrophic Keloid Scar (10X 1 cm), S/PGanglion Excision” as unfitting, rated 10%with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The commander’s statement indicated that the CI had made limited progress and the persistent pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00025

    Original file (PD-2012-00025.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Wrist Condition . The CI was evaluated by multiple orthopedic specialists and after the MEB examination underwent repeat surgery for the OCD on 3 February 2005.A PT note on 15 August 2005 noted the CI reported doing “pretty well,” with improved ability to walk and decreased pain.At the MEB examinationthe CI reported right ankle pain. At a VA outpatient physical medicine evaluation on 9 November 2005, 2 months after separation, the CI reported right ankle pain despite two surgeries...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00294

    Original file (PD2012-00294.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB adjudicated complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), left foot and ankle as unfitting, rated 20% and symptomatic posterior tibial tendinitis, left as a Category II condition with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), respectively. The symptomatic posterior tibial tendinitis, left foot condition requested for consideration and the unfitting CRPS, left foot and ankle conditions meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview, and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00095

    Original file (PD2010-00095.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a review of all evidence, the Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending the left superficial peroneal nerve injury as a separate unfitting condition for separation rating. The Board determined therefore that this condition was not subject to service disability rating. Other Conditions.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00201

    Original file (PD2009-00201.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued military service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The VA considered both RSD and Mood Disorder to be associated with the service-connected condition of Residual, Right Ankle Sprain and therefore applied disability ratings to both conditions. The other diagnoses rated by the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01227

    Original file (PD2012-01227.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. Pre-Sep Right Left -10* 25 2 35 Comment *“Lacks 10⁰ to 0/Neutral DF” Left 10 25 Right 12 35 L ankle w/ mild generalized tenderness; Drawer sign (-); mild valgus-varus laxity; strength 3-4/5; Neurovascular intact; 1+ foot & ankle edema; TTP Left 0-20 0-45 Right NE Normal gait; no painful motion, edema, instability or weakness; no flat feet; no limited function of standing or walking; has left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00275

    Original file (PD2013 00275.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Plain film X-rays did not demonstrate any fractures; however, multiple boney fragments were seen that represented either old injury or a normal variant finding. At the MEB NARSUM exam, approximately 6months prior to separation, the CI reported significant pain and recurrent episodes of instability of the right ankle. The VA applied VASRD code 5010-5271, limited motion of the ankle, and rated it 10% disabling consistent with a “moderate” limitation of motion.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00629

    Original file (PD2011-00629.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI underwent three complex surgeries to correct the bilateral ankle pathology, however, he continued with pain stiffness and limited motion in both ankles and feet. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00617

    Original file (PD2011-00617.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was addressed by the MEB, and forwarded on the DA Form 3947 as “not ratable.” The PEB adjudicated both orthopedic conditions as unfitting; rating the left hand/wrist CRPS condition 20%, citing criteria of the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); and, rating the right ankle condition 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical...