Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01703
Original file (PD-2014-01703.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01703
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150512
SEPARATION DATE: 20040522


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-1 (Cannon Crewmember) medically separated for diabetes. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). A profile allowed for an alternate aerobic event to satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for an Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Diabetes mellitus Type I was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated diabetes mellitus Type I as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The applicant makes no specific contention in his application. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any condition outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :
Service IPEB – Dated 20040317
 VA* - (~5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Diabetes Mellitus Type I 7913 20% Diabetes Mellitus Type I 7913 20% 20041018
Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 0
RATING: 20%
 RATING: 20%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 50107 (most proxima te to date of separation (DOS))



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Diabetes Mellitus Type I. In November 2003, the CI presented for evaluation of vomiting, blurred vision, thirst, increased urination, weight loss and weakness. A diagnosis of new onset Type I diabetes mellitus was made. Due to the presence of ketoacidosis, a short initial hospitalization was required. The narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation on 8 December 2003, approximately 5 months before separation, reported the CI was on an insulin regimen and regaining lost weight. One episode of low blood sugar after skipping a meal was reported, but specific hypoglycemic symptoms were not described. At a follow-up with nutritional medicine the following day, the CI reported that he “does a lot of exercise, eats balanced meals.” Further dietary instruction was provided. The permanent physical profile on 24 February 2004 allowed for walking, cycling, swimming and running at own pace and distance. A NARSUM update on 3 March 2004 (3 months prior to separation) reported that the CI’s command had impacted negatively on his ability to maintain control of his diabetes by impeding access to food and medications. Extreme high and low blood sugar levels were associated with mood swings and loss of military bearing that resulted in two Article 15s and reduction in rank. The provider recommended close physician follow-up “for now at least two times per month.”

Laboratory evaluation by a civilian provider 3 months after separation showed that the CI’s diabetes was not well-controlled. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 18 October 2004 (5 months after separation) the CI reported no hypoglycemic episodes. He was using insulin every day and reported a 2-month history of a slowly healing left leg ulcer. The examiner stated there were no episodes of ketoacidosis and no functional impairment due to diabetes. The condition did not cause restriction of any activities. Based on laboratory results, the examiner concluded that the CI’s diabetes was uncontrolled. At a follow-up with a civilian physician on 17 November 2004, the CI reported no complaints. Home blood sugars were not in the hypoglycemic range. The CI was advised to restart weight lifting. On 22 April 2005 (11 months after separation) a hospital admission note recorded that the CI had now been hospitalized for the third time in recent months for diabetic ketoacidosis due to noncompliance with insulin administration.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and the VA each assigned a 20% rating under the 7913 code (diabetes mellitus). The Board agreed that the requirement for insulin and restricted diet justified the 20% rating. Board members concluded however that the “regulation of activities” stipulation was not met in this case, and therefore no rating higher than 20% was justified. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the diabetes mellitus Type I condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the diabetes mellitus Type I condition and IAW VASRD §4.119, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140420, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review




 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150013456 (PD201401703)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02326

    Original file (PD-2013-02326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He denied hospitalization for diabetes or diabetic complications and had a full-time job.At a C&P exam on 13 June 2007(14 months after TDRL placement) the CI reported that if “he runs or does any type of activities he will have hypoglycemia.” He therefore restricted his activities. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Both at the time of placement on the TDRL and at the time of permanent disability disposition and removal from the TDRL, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00783

    Original file (PD2011-00783.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA both rated the diabetes condition under VASRD code 7913, diabetes mellitus, but at different ratings. There was no evidence in the service treatment records that indicated medical restriction of normal activities including athletic was required. The PEB and VA both rated the condition 0% code 6200, chronic right mastoiditis.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01445

    Original file (PD2012-01445.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating. CI CONTENTION: “The 20% rating does not fit the disability, Type I Diabetes with controlled diet, restricted activities, and insulin dependent starts at the 40% rating. 3 PD1201445 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01765

    Original file (PD-2012-01765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) evaluation (2 months prior to separation) documented “frequent variations in his blood sugar ... though ... no major reactions for hypoglycemic or ketoacidosis type;” specifying dietary limitations, but stating “not restricted in his activities as a result of the diabetes;” and, noted that “He sees the diabetic care provider every six weeks to two months.” if separately evaluated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01648

    Original file (PD-2013-01648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXCASE:PD-2013-01648BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 20140716 Separation Date: 20040608 I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01132

    Original file (PD-2013-01132.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. It is appropriately coded 7913, and IAW VASRD §4.119, meets criteria for the 60% rating level due to requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities; with an episode of ketoacidosis, which required hospitalization, plus complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated. In the CI’s treatment record, there was not sufficient...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02244

    Original file (PD-2013-02244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20091009VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%**STROther x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 0STR Combined: 20%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100226 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01897

    Original file (PD-2014-01897.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01861

    Original file (PD-2013-01861.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) did not consider the CI’s referred bilateral knee condition (as the original MEB did not forward this condition for PEB adjudication) and only adjudicated the referred diabetes mellitus condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00376

    Original file (PD2009-00376.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    With initiation of insulin treatment, the CI's blood sugar levels were 90's to 160's with no episodes of hypoglycemia, as per medical record documentation immediately prior to placement on TDRL. The Board also considered the condition of Bilateral Lower Extremity Peripheral Neuropathy at the CI’s request. When determining the final and permanent disability rating, the Board must evaluate the CI’s condition at the time of separation from the TDRL in 2008.