Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01648
Original file (PD-2013-01648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE : PD -20 13 - 01648
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 201 4 0716
Separation Date: 20040608


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty A1C/E-3 (2W051/Munitions Specialist) medically separated for Diabetes Mellitus, Type II. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty (AFS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a P4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The informal PEB adjudicated the Diabetes Mellitus, Type II requiring insulin, condition as unfitting and rated it at 20% citing the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB adjudicated obesity as a Category III condition, not separately unfitting and not compensable. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting Diabetes Mellitus, Type II condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040408
 VA - (Exam ~ 1 Mo. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Diabetes Mellitus, Type II … 7913 20% Type II Diabetes with Diabetic Retinopathy 7913 20% 20040510
Obesity
 Category III Other x2 20040510
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040820 (most proxi mate to date of separation )

ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Diabetes Mellitus, Type II Condition . The CI had a long history of Diabetes Type II as evidenced by the numerous notes in the service treatment record . He was first diagnosed with diabetes in 2001 and was initially controlled by diet and exercise. He was seen by e ndocrinology because he had his first failure on the weight management program . He s t a r t ed on a modified Atkins diet in June and was seen in follow up by e ndocrinology in July 2002 who noted that the blood sugars were less than 100 in the morning and less than 110 in the evening. The e ndocrinologist docu mented that the CI had lost 5 pounds , from 210 pound to 205 pounds , with the glycosylated hemoglobin (HgbA1C) at 6.3 and blood glucose 103 (normal 75-110 ) and he was advised to continue the Atkins diet and check his finger sticks after each meal. The CI had an 8   pound weight gain because he stopped the Atkins diet 2 w eeks prior to this ap pointment . The e ndocrinologist sta r ted him on an oral hypoglycemic (Metformin). The finger sticks before dinner were 70 to 80. The CI’s diabetes was poorly controlled in August 2003 with fasting glucose 160 and ranges from 160 to 180 in the evening. A diabetic group checklist documented a n HgbA1C on 25 July 2002 at 6.3 (normal 4-6%) and on 6 August 2003 at 8.8. The internal m edicine provider documented that the diabetes was poorly controlled and changed the oral hypoglycemic to Glipizide as the CI could not tolerate the Metformin or the Avandia. The HgbA1C was 10.0 on 18 November 2003 and the provider started insulin therapy. The CI continued to have a poor response to insulin with finger sticks in the 200’s and required additional insuli n titration. He was seen by a n utritionist and attended , which noted that although the CI was a highly competent person and a valuable asset to the flight, his diabetes interfered with him fulfilling his wartime and peacetime requirements as he could not deploy. The CI was given a temporary P4 Profile. The MEB narrative summary exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented that the CI had an HgbA1C of 10.0 and b ecause the diabetes was poorly controlled, the CI would require larger doses of insulin to control his diabetes resulting in even more weight gain. The VA Compensation and Pension exam approximately a month prior to separation documented that the CI’s diabetes required an oral hypoglycemic twice a day , insulin daily and a novo pen 3 times a day . The examiner opined that the CI had no restriction of activity f r om the diabetes and there was no functional impairment from the condition. The CI had no episodes of ketoacidosis and no complications of diabetes such as problems with vision, kidneys, skin, neuropathy, impotence or arterial disease.

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the Diabetes Mellitus, Type II condition as 7913 and rated at 20%. The VA coded the Type II Diabetes with Diabetic Retinopathy as 7913 and rated at 20%. The CI had poorly controlled diabetes and required combination therapy of oral hypoglycemic, insulin and a novo pen. The CI had no episodes of ketoacidosis. The VA examiner documented there was no restriction of activity from the diabetes. The Board considered the 20% rating criteria ( r equiring insulin and restricted diet, or; oral hypoglycemic agent and restricted diet ) versus 40% criteria ( r equiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities ) . While the CI required insulin and a restricted diet, there was no regulation of activities . After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the Diabetes Mellitus, Type II condition .


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the Diabetes Mellitus, Type II condition and IAW VASRD §4. 121 , the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

invalid font number 31502
RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI's disability and separation determination.




The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130927 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB


Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01648

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,








                                                              
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency

Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00642

    Original file (PD2012-00642.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW SEPARATION DATE: 20020731 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200642 BOARD DATE: 20121025 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4, (31U, Communications Specialist) medically separated for Type II diabetes mellitus (DM). Pre-Separation) – Effective Date 20020801 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Condition Diabetes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02242

    Original file (PD-2013-02242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20050831 The MEB examiner documented that the CI could not do unlimited running, walking, biking or swimming and further opined that she should not be allowed to operate heavy equipment.The Board considered the 20% rating versus a 40% rating (requiring insulin, restricted diet and regulation of activities).After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the DM Type I...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01031

    Original file (PD2011-01031.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the 40% rating was not supported by the evidence of the service treatment record, the PEB placed the CI on the TDRL with a rating of 40%. The PEB concluded the diabetes unfitting for continued military service and adjudicated a permanent 20% rating. Both at the time of placement on the TDRL and at the time of permanent disability disposition and removal from the TDRL, the CI’s diabetes was treated with diet and medication (an oral medication and insulin) meeting the VASRD criteria...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01132

    Original file (PD-2013-01132.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. It is appropriately coded 7913, and IAW VASRD §4.119, meets criteria for the 60% rating level due to requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities; with an episode of ketoacidosis, which required hospitalization, plus complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated. In the CI’s treatment record, there was not sufficient...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00912

    Original file (PD 2013 00912.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “diabetes mellitus”as unfitting and rated it20%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board evaluates VA evidence in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation. As noted above, the CI was separated in November 2001 with a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01946

    Original file (PD-2014-01946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus, Type II791320%Diabetes Mellitus791320%20050228Other x0 (Not in Scope)Other x720050228 Combined: 20%Combined: 50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050728(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. In this case, the CI required oral medication and insulin use along with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00676

    Original file (PD2009-00676.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Independently rating the CI’s DM at separation, considering the evidence in the military and pre-separation VA records, absent any non-compliance deduction, and considering “complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated” (by the military) the CI would best fit the 60% 7913 criteria of “Requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities with episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring one or two hospitalizations per year or twice a month...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00376

    Original file (PD2009-00376.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    With initiation of insulin treatment, the CI's blood sugar levels were 90's to 160's with no episodes of hypoglycemia, as per medical record documentation immediately prior to placement on TDRL. The Board also considered the condition of Bilateral Lower Extremity Peripheral Neuropathy at the CI’s request. When determining the final and permanent disability rating, the Board must evaluate the CI’s condition at the time of separation from the TDRL in 2008.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01207

    Original file (PD2012 01207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “diabetes mellitus type 1”as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI did not agree with the PEB findings but did request a formal hearing or submit an appeal, so his case was sent to the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA). This condition was indeed “not unfitting” at the time of separation.The Board therefore concluded that this condition...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00736

    Original file (PD2012-00736.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have to take shots 4 times a day, strenuous activities cause me to have periods of hypoglycemia at work and during various activities outside of work. The PEB rated the CI’s Type 1 DM, requiring Insulin and restricted diet coded 7913 DM at 20%. The CI contended that he requires regulation of activity in order to control his DM.