Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00838
Original file (PD-2014-00838.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2014-00838
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140709
SEPARATION DATE: 20080813


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E5 (11B/Infantry) medically separated for a right knee condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee condition, characterized as “right knee degeneration and right knee pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “painful limitation of motion of the right knee following ACL reconstruction” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was separated.


CI CONTENTION: “The reason I believe my rating should be changed is because the only test that was ever issued was a range of motion. I believe if I would have been tested on my lateral movements to the left and right being my biggest issue for me since being separated, they would have seen it was more severe than the percentage I was granted. It is hard to play any sports with family & friends due to this issue. Also there was never a weight bearing exam done and this is also a big issue for me when walking upstairs or standing long periods of time and knee giving out during these activities.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – dated 20080221
 VA – 2 mos. Pre-Separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Knee Pain 5260 10% Right Knee Condition 5260-5024 10% 20080626
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
Other x 6 20080626
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
      Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20080827 ( most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee: In 2003, this CI injured his right knee while playing football. He underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and medial meniscus repair. After surgery, he did well and was able to continue with his duties. In May 2007, while in Iraq, he suffered another right knee injury. Arthroscopy was done, which showed re-injury of the right medial meniscus. In spite of all treatment efforts, the CI’s knee problems persisted, and an MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary was dictated on 17 January 2008. The CI complained of right knee pain, but denied any instability or locking. Physical exam (PE) of the right knee revealed no erythema (redness) and no effusion (increased fluid in the joint). There was some medial joint line tenderness noted. The knee was stable to varus/valgus stress. The Lachman’s test was stable and posterior drawer sign was negative. The right leg was intact neurovascularly, with normal motor strength. Range-of-motion (ROM) was 0-135 degrees. Two months before separation, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension exam. PE of the right knee revealed no ligamentous instability. McMurray’s test was negative. ROM was measured and is shown in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 30 weeks Pre-Sep
(20080117)		 VA C&P ~ 7 weeks Pre-Sep
(20080626)
Flexion (140 Normal) 135 140
Extension (0 Normal) 0 0
Comment no mention of pain with motion p ainful motion
§4.71a Rating 0 % 10 % *
  *10% based on VASRD §4.40 (Functional loss), §4.45 (The joints), and §4.59 (Painful motion) invalid font number 31502

The Board carefully examined all available evidence and directs attention to its rating recommendation. The Army PEB and the VA chose similar coding options for the right knee condition and both assigned a rating of 10%. The Board considered the results of the two ROM examinations shown above. At both exams, the CI had 135 (or greater) degrees of right knee flexion, with no significant evidence of ligamentous instability. After a thorough review of the record, the Board determined that the right knee condition was essentially non-compensable based solely on the VASRD §4.71a codes for limitation of knee motion (5260 and 5261). However; IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, a part of the musculoskeletal system which becomes painful on use must be regarded as seriously disabled. A rating of 10% is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint. After reviewing the evidence, all Board members agreed that a rating of 10% was appropriate for the right knee condition. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating, using other codes which could be applied to the knee condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating, since the record did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling knee condition which would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the right knee condition. IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, the right knee meets criteria for a 10% rating due to painful motion of a major joint.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140219, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record



                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX AR20150006627 (PD201400838)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00507

    Original file (PD-2012-00507.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ is Normal) Extension (0⁰ is Normal) MEB – 5½ mos. The Army PEB combined the two painful joint conditions into a single unfitting condition: “Right shoulder and right knee pain.” The condition was coded 5099‐5003 and rated at 0%. Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate disability rating for each joint.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01678

    Original file (PD-2012-01678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right knee condition, characterized as right knee chondromalacia patella, anterior knee pain syndrome, and nonunion of patellar fracture, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Right Knee ROM MEB – 4 mos. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic, Painful Right Knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01745

    Original file (PD-2014-01745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hyperlipidemia was submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable.The Informal PEBadjudicated “right knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, and “left knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). On PE of the knees, the left knee was normal in appearance. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02990

    Original file (PD-2014-02990.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Bilateral Knee Pain5299-5262NSC**20030529Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 10 Rating: 0%Combined: 30% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20030820(most proximate to date of separation)**Subsequent VARD dated 20060428 rated left and right knees (5099-5014) at 10% each, effective 20050927 The Army PEB combined the CI’s knee pain into a single unfitting condition: “Bilateral knee pain, without any...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00781

    Original file (PD2011-00781.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review, as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. Right Knee Condition . At that exam, the right knee ROM failed to reach compensable levels for the VASRD codes specific to leg flexion and extension (5260 and 5261).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00803

    Original file (PD2012-00803.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Knee Pain . The knee pain condition was coded 5099-5003 and rated at 0%. Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate disability rating for each knee.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00930

    Original file (PD-2012-00930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200930 SEPARATION DATE: 20030801 BOARD DATE: 20130328 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty CPL/E-4 (71L/Postal Operator) medically separated for chronic bilateral knee pain. The PEB combined the two chronic knee pain problems into a single unfitting condition: “Chronic bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01635

    Original file (PD-2013-01635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Physical examination of the left knee revealed full range-of-motion (ROM), with marked patellar compression pain and the knee was ligamentous stablewith no meniscal pathology.The CI was separated from service on 8 April 2004 and his VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed 6 months later in October 2004. There was no path to a higher rating for the left knee since there was no evidence of joint instability, subluxation, or other significant knee abnormality.After due...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01327

    Original file (PD2012-01327.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY SEPARATION DATE: 20030527 NAME: XX CASE NUMBER: PD1201327 BOARD DATE: 20130206 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PO2/E-5 (PH2/Photographer's Mate) medically separated for chondromalacia, right medial femoral condyle and trochlea. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02387

    Original file (PD-2013-02387.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Right Knee Strain525710%20060603Left Knee Strain525710%20060603Other x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 620060603 Combined: 0%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060718 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Knee pain . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the...