Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02990
Original file (PD-2014-02990.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2014-02990
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141105
SEPARATION DATE: 20030703


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (12B/Combat Engineer) medically separated for bilateral knee pain. This knee condition did not improve adequately to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral knee condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the knee condition as unfitting, rated at 0% citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting bilateral knee condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20030417
 VA* – (~1 mo. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Bilateral Knee Pain 5299-5262 NSC** 20030529
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 10
Rating: 0%
 Combined: 30%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 30820 (most proximate to date of separation )
**Subsequent VARD dated 20060428 rated left and right knees (5099-5014) at 10% each, effective 20050927


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Knee Pain. In July 2003, this CI was separated from service due to bilateral knee pain. It started around September 1997 and worsened over time. There was no specific injury or trauma associated with the onset of pain. His MEB physical exam (PE) was in February 2003. At that visit, the CI reported pain in the retropatellar and lateral aspects of both knees. He was unable to run, ruck or road-march. PE of the knees revealed normal knee alignment and normal range-of-motion (ROM). Tests for ligamentous laxity were negative. The diagnosis was: “Chronic bilateral knee pain.” A month prior to separation, on 29 May 2003, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension exam. He reported occasional bilateral knee pain. Gait and station were normal. PE of the knees revealed no swelling or deformity. ROM was normal and tests for ligamentous laxity were negative. The examiner wrote: “Basically normal evaluation of the knees. Cannot ascribe any physical diagnosis, nor attribute any physical impairment to this complaint.” The ROM evaluations which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation are summarized in the chart below.

Knee ROM
 (Degrees)
 MEB ~3 ½ mos . Pre-Sep
(20030319)
 VA C&P ~ 1 m o. P re -Sep
(200 30529 )
Left Right Left Right
Flexion (140 Normal)
 140 140 140 140
Extension (0 Normal)
 0 0 0 0

The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available and directs attention to its rating recommendation. The Army PEB combined the CI’s knee pain into a single unfitting condition: “Bilateral knee pain, without any specific history of trauma or injury.” The knee pain was coded 5099-5003 and rated at 0%. The Board evaluated whether or not it was appropriate for the two knees to be “bundled” together. The Board must determine if the PEB’s approach of combining the conditions under a single rating was justified in lieu of separate ratings. The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW the VASRD §4.71a. If the Board judges that two or more separate ratings are warranted, however, it must satisfy the requirement that each ‘unbundled’ condition was separately unfitting. After due deliberation, the Board determined by majority decision (2:1 vote) that each knee is reasonability justified as separately unfitting. Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate disability rating for each knee.

The painful knee condition was essentially non-compensable based on the VASRD §4.71a diagnostic codes 5260 and 5261 (loss of knee motion). However; IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, when part of the musculoskeletal system becomes painful on use, it must be regarded as seriously disabled. A 10% rating is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint. There was no path to a rating higher than 10% for either knee since there was no evidence of ligamentous instability, subluxation, locking, or other significantly disabling joint abnormality. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for chronic unfitting right knee pain. In like manner, the Board recommends a rating of 10% for chronic unfitting left knee pain.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the chronic right knee pain, the Board recommends by majority decision, a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5257 IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45 and §4.59. In the matter of the chronic left knee pain, the Board recommends by majority decision, a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5257 IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45 and §4.59. The single voter for dissent did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Right Knee Pain 5299-5257 10%
Chronic Left Knee Pain 5299-5257 10%
COMBINED (w/ BLF)
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140623, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record











                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150006236 (PD201402990)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02387

    Original file (PD-2013-02387.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Right Knee Strain525710%20060603Left Knee Strain525710%20060603Other x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 620060603 Combined: 0%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060718 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Knee pain . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02422

    Original file (PD-2013-02422.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She reported “some ‘give way’ symptoms approximately five to six times per week” and “some catching but no true locking.” The MEB physical exam (DD Form 2808 dated 18 November 2005; 7 months prior to separation) documented left knee mild diffuse swelling with multiple scars. The NARSUM dated 25 April 2006 (2 months prior to separation) referenced the orthopedic consult exam findings above and documented active ROM that was -3 to 122 degrees symmetrically on both knees (normal 0-140 degrees)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02311

    Original file (PD-2013-02311.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BLEconditions, characterized as “quadriceps tendinopathy” and “stress reaction tibia” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral knee pain with right greater than left chronic quadriceps tendon insertional pain,” and “bilateral leg pain consistent with posteromedial tibial stress reaction,”as unfitting, rated at 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00507

    Original file (PD-2012-00507.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ is Normal) Extension (0⁰ is Normal) MEB – 5½ mos. The Army PEB combined the two painful joint conditions into a single unfitting condition: “Right shoulder and right knee pain.” The condition was coded 5099‐5003 and rated at 0%. Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate disability rating for each joint.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00803

    Original file (PD2012-00803.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Knee Pain . The knee pain condition was coded 5099-5003 and rated at 0%. Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate disability rating for each knee.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01752

    Original file (PD 2012 01752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), §4.59 (painful motion), and §4.40 (functional loss), the Board recommends that the bilateral knee condition be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: right knee pain coded 5299-5260 rated 10% and left knee pain coded 5299-5260 rated 10%. In the matter of the bilateral knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends that each joint be separately adjudicated as follows:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00969

    Original file (PD 2012 00969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic bilateral knee pain due to RPS condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01745

    Original file (PD-2014-01745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hyperlipidemia was submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable.The Informal PEBadjudicated “right knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, and “left knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). On PE of the knees, the left knee was normal in appearance. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00481

    Original file (PD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board then considered whether there was sufficient evidence to support a 10% rating for functional loss (§4.40, §4.45).The MEB examination in January 2006 recorded a history of left knee pain “sometimes,” and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00930

    Original file (PD-2012-00930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200930 SEPARATION DATE: 20030801 BOARD DATE: 20130328 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty CPL/E-4 (71L/Postal Operator) medically separated for chronic bilateral knee pain. The PEB combined the two chronic knee pain problems into a single unfitting condition: “Chronic bilateral...