Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02806
Original file (PD-2013-02806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-02806
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army          BOARD DATE: 20150602
SEPARATION DATE: 20060719


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Abrams Tank Systems Maintainer) medically separated for a right (dominant) shoulder condition which could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition “recurrent right shoulder instability with ... pain” was forwarded as the sole submission to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic right shoulder pain [elaborating surgical history]” as unfitting, rated 10%, referencing application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency ( USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: “Instability/dislocation of dominate shoulder. Due to this I was restricted by my surgeon from wearing combat gear and was not permitted to qualify with my assigned weapon which was an M-16. Due to Army regulations all Service Members were required to be able to be combat effective. Upon release from Service I was not evaluated for PTSD either, which I am now diagnosed with having from my service.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20060517
 VA* (4 Mo. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Shoulder Pain 5099-5003 10% Surgical Residuals, Right Shoulder 5203 10% 20061117
Other x 0
 Other x 3
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 30%
* Derived from Decision Review Officer (DRO) Decision dated 200 71113 .

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Shoulder. An early entry in the available service treatment record (STR) documents a history of right shoulder instability and dislocations dating to 1989, overlapping with a period of prior service. The CI experienced several dislocations soon after reenlisting in 1997, and multiple STR entries indicate significant joint instability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed tears of the labrum (rim of the shoulder socket) and of a rotator cuff tendon (infraspinatus) and the CI underwent arthroscopic surgical interventions in May 2002 and October 2003. These procedures failed to fully stabilize the shoulder and open surgery with tendon grafting was performed in December 2005 (7 months prior to separation). Post-operative STR evidence indicates that this intervention was successful with no recurrent dislocations; and, multiple entries documented grossly normal and painless range-of-motion (ROM) with a stable joint. A subsequent arthrogram (MRI dye study) and X-ray series with stress views were normal (intact ligaments, tendons, and joint capsule without laxity to stress). There is no STR evidence (proximate to separation) for significant ROM limitation, joint deformity, instability, joint impingement, or periods of incapacitation after surgical recovery.

The narrative summary (NARSUM) was conducted 29 March 2006 (4 months prior to separation), and documented the favorable post-operative course reflected above, with pain “down to 1 out of 10 at its worse and ... resolution of his instability.” The examiner made note, however, of an injury a month earlier resulting in a clinical setback, stating “his pain has improved somewhat and he is feeling that he is getting back to the point where he was in Rehab just prior to this re-injury.” The pain was characterized as “frequent” and “moderate,” specifying profile limitations and lifting restriction to 5 pounds. The NARSUM physical examination recorded the absence of tenderness or significant instability (negative apprehension sign) and some residual weakness (4/5) with internal rotation. The NARSUM measured ROM was forward flexion to 170 degrees (normal 180, minimum compensable 90) and abduction to 120 degrees (same parameters), annotating painful motion.

A VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination was conducted 17 November 2006 (4 months after separation), and documented a complaint of “residual history of instability with certain range of motions ... approximately 2-3 times per week ....” Pain severity and specific limitations were not elaborated. The VA physical examination recorded “well-healed scars” but no other joint findings; and, provided ROM measurements of forward flexion and abduction to 170 degrees each, annotating painful motion.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB’s 10% rating analogous to 5003 (degenerative arthritis) cited the “slight ... frequent” criterion of the USAPDA pain policy, but was consistent with VASRD §4.71a criteria for the service ROM and ratable findings (conceding painful motion). The VA decision (DRO revised from original 0%) conferred the minimum 10% rating under code 5203 (clavicle or scapula, impairment of), citing painful motion. With the lack of any ratable ROM limitation, ankylosis, or bone injury, there is no §4.71a route to a rating higher than 10%. Consideration was given to an analogous rating under 5299-5202 (humerus, other impairment of) which would confer ratings for instability and recurrent dislocations. The residual subjective instability documented by the VA examiner could arguably result in functional impairment fairly captured under 5299-5202; but, members agreed that there was scant evidence to corroborate any functional consequences of instability at separation, especially considering the ample evidence that there was no significant objective instability. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the right shoulder condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating was operant in this case and it was adjudicated independently of that policy by this Board. In the matter of the right shoulder condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131219, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review









 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150012808 (PD201302806)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01626

    Original file (PD 2012 01626.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board considered the two conditions for separate disability ratings. The CI had painful limited ROM of the right shoulder, without evidence of instability following surgery. In the matter of the bilateral shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability ratings as follow: an unfitting right shoulder condition rated 10%, coded 5201 and an unfitting left shoulder condition, rated 0%, coded 5202, both IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00532

    Original file (PD2012-00532.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW The Board further notes the significant interval (>3 years) between the date of separation and the DVA evaluation. The initial PEB rating and the VA rating were under the code 5201 (limitation of motion).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01922

    Original file (PD-2014-01922.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Shoulder Multi-Directional Instability5299-500310%Tendinitis/MultidirectionalInstability, Right Shoulder5201-502410%20050922Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00500

    Original file (PD2013 00500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CASE: PD1300500 BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 20130827 No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “left shoulder bidirectional instability due to left anterior labral tear and type II SLAP tear”as unfitting, rated 20%,with cited application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. Although there was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01628

    Original file (PD2012 01628.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a permanent U3 profile andreferred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated the left shoulder and left cubital tunnel conditions as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a combined 20% disability rating. The ROM was noted as painful. The examiner...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01420

    Original file (PD-2013-01420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Shoulder Condition . Physical Disability Board of Review XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Disability separation with a final disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10%) effective date of discharge.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01187

    Original file (PD 2013 01187.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-50030%Left Shoulder Pain, History of Dislocation5202-502410%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x7 Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060921 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Chronic Left Shoulder Pain Condition . ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00340

    Original file (PD-2014-00340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00006

    Original file (PD-2014-00006.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Shoulder Condition. In the matter of the left shoulder pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00804

    Original file (PD-2012-00804.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. After his original injury with dislocations of both shoulders, the CI had multidirectional instability and recurrent dislocations of both his right and left shoulders. Based on the condition the CI actually had, the shoulders can be rated either using 5201 for limited ROM or...